games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Blizzard not milking StarCraft 2, money was 'never part of the conversation' photo

According to Blizzard COO Paul Sams, Blizzard isn’t trying to tickle your pocketbooks by splitting StarCraft 2 into three individual games. In a recent interview with Videogamer, Sams defended the decision by noting that money was never a “part of the conversation.” It was done to provide a “better experience” for the consumer.

From the interview:

I guarantee it. I give my word. There was never, ever a conversation where we said, ‘let’s do this because we’re going to make more money’. I guarantee it. As a matter of fact the sole reason we did it was because we thought it was going to be a better experience. Anybody that says otherwise is not correct. It is absolutely not what we did it for.
While I congratulate Sams for being so blunt, I find it particularly hard to believe that the faces around the boardroom didn’t light up when the idea of splitting the title was being thrown around. Regardless, I have high hopes and I’m starting to buy into the fact that three StarCraft 2s isn’t a bad thing. What do you guys think?

 

[via VG247]


Continue: More StarCraft stories





prev next

45 comments | showing # 1 to 45

CALkulon's Avatar
CALkulon at 11/12/2008 17:29
Right, and I'm Mary Poppins.

No, really, I am.
F Whipple's Avatar
F Whipple at 11/12/2008 17:31
My bullshit meter is off the charts
Lurkmon's Avatar
Lurkmon at 11/12/2008 17:32
Fuck post-WoW Blizzard. They're asshats now.
njsykora's Avatar
njsykora at 11/12/2008 17:33
In other news, Colette just killed a Chocobo.
Dan CiTi's Avatar
Dan CiTi at 11/12/2008 17:35
I wouldn't be so sour if they weren't making Battle.net pay to play and over simplifying SCII.
ArrestedDeveloper's Avatar
ArrestedDeveloper at 11/12/2008 17:36
I'm sure that they had a lot of trouble convincing Activision that selling the game 3 times was a good thing.
lyfeforce's Avatar
lyfeforce at 11/12/2008 17:41
Uh huh. The extra cash just happens to be an extra benefit of the bettered experience. Right.
casualweaponry's Avatar
casualweaponry at 11/12/2008 17:41
I'll just wait for the Starcraft 2 Battle Chest. Sure, it'll be a few years down the line, but I'll be able to get all three games at a discount.
World Eater's Avatar
World Eater at 11/12/2008 17:51
Bunch of whoreshit.
Transbot's Avatar
Transbot at 11/12/2008 18:06
Whatever, it'll be awesome. All the haters can just pfft.

B-Radicate's Avatar
B-Radicate at 11/12/2008 18:06
Yeah, sure, whatever. But wouldn't 3 Starcraft 2's actually make it Starcraft 2-4?
grafkhun's Avatar
grafkhun at 11/12/2008 18:09
so did you guys here that Shigeru Miyamoto and Cliff Blizenski are teaming up and making a new game? it's rumored to be like a Mario platformer except you can't jump anymore and you use mushrooms with chainsaws on them to attack.
Tekoa's Avatar
Tekoa at 11/12/2008 18:12
wait...wut? 3 Starcraft 2's? did i miss something?
nahthanks's Avatar
nahthanks at 11/12/2008 18:16
And that's why they're releasing them for $20 a piece.
mo0man's Avatar
mo0man at 11/12/2008 18:22
I thought they were just taking an "expansion" way of doing it. There's a chronological order to this right? I just don't get why everyone is all surprised about Blizzard dropping expansions when they've been doing this fucking forever. The real question is why they're doing two expansions instead of three
Tekoa's Avatar
Tekoa at 11/12/2008 18:22
oh...nevermind.
aaronf's Avatar
aaronf at 11/12/2008 18:26
I'll buy the first one and pirate the other 2.
Paroxysm's Avatar
Paroxysm at 11/12/2008 18:35
So each release to be at expansion pack prices? I mean money was never one of the motivators after all. They're just really nice and want to give us the best experience.
Holyetheline's Avatar
Holyetheline at 11/12/2008 18:39
I'm sure this game will turn out just fine. I won't be playing it.
Dudemullet's Avatar
Dudemullet at 11/12/2008 18:47
Reasons why they're asswipes now:

1.- 1 x 60 = 60, 3 x 60 = 180, theyre lying

2.- They also said they wanetd to start charging for Battle.NET WTF? battle.net sucks compared to other game matchmaking systems, anyone who's ever payed DOTA can testify to this.

3.- how bout that bit that theyre only focusing on games wich they can profit on a yearly basis ?


douchebags
TewDee's Avatar
TewDee at 11/12/2008 18:48
It prints money?

IT PRINTS MONEY!
Professor Pew's Avatar
Professor Pew at 11/12/2008 18:49
I can believe one guy saying this, as long as he doesn't work for Activision management :P
Slatox's Avatar
Slatox at 11/12/2008 19:49
I expect most people will buy the first one for multiplayer and pirate the rest.
vrplumber's Avatar
vrplumber at 11/12/2008 19:49
Yeah these business hate to even think about money.

The only reason Blizzard charges a monthly fee for WoW is so that they can collects mountains of cash and have it burned.
Cubilone's Avatar
Cubilone at 11/12/2008 20:01
I can just picture him saying this only barely keeping the laughs in.
falinter's Avatar
falinter at 11/12/2008 20:12
Since they are splitting the game into 3 for the sake of experience and not money they should donate the proceeds of two of the games to charity.
Knigge's Avatar
Knigge at 11/12/2008 20:26
Still waiting for the $30 "battle chest."
RAB's Avatar
RAB at 11/12/2008 20:59
They really should just put it into one big pack of 3 discs and charge a little more for it. I wouldn't mind THAT at all.
bluexy's Avatar
bluexy at 11/12/2008 22:00
To turn this into a positive thing they've got to do one of two things:

They have to make each game cheaper. This one's simple, and is the most likely option for them. It may be a completely redesigned system with huge amounts of story in each box... but they're still all three the same in that they all produced from one development cycle and not three separate ones.

Or, they get the engine built, and then spend equal amounts of time developing content for each installment. That means if you've got three races for the first game, you've got to give us more for the next game. If that won't work with "the plan" then you've got to add new mechanics. Big mechanics.

Blizzard -must- admit to themselves that the situation they've created won't allow them to follow the simple, "It's an expansion! Charge full price!" method. They've got to eat their shit sandwich and step up on this one.
rbrooks's Avatar
rbrooks at 11/12/2008 22:12
of course it's a dumb idea.
dissectional's Avatar
dissectional at 11/12/2008 22:34
Its hilarious how dumb they are to think that people are dumb enough to swallow that bullshit hook, line and sinker.
monosylabik's Avatar
monosylabik at 11/13/2008 00:46
this is still bullshit. I'll gladly wait an extra 2 years for blizzard to finish the game so I can play all 3 campaigns from day one.

whatever happend to "when its done, it's done"?
RWarrior1CO's Avatar
RWarrior1CO at 11/13/2008 00:46
Ok, so, how does this work? If I buy the version of Starcraft 2 with the Terrans, can I still play Protoss and Zerg in multiplayer?

If so, I get the feeling that I would get more value for my dollar getting just one version of SC2 than all of them. If not, then screw you, Blizzard.

Also, I want to be able to select as many units at one time as I like. Get on that, Blizzard.
Ratcliff's Avatar
Ratcliff at 11/13/2008 01:04
You know what... I believe him.

Blizzard doesn't need the money and lets face it, the more Starcraft, the better for us.
Mohawk's Avatar
Mohawk at 11/13/2008 01:07
*ahem* Pokemans Red, Blue, Green, Yellow, Silver, Gold, Sapphire, Arse, Vommit.

Regardless, I've only played Starcraft a few times so I don't really care. But I'm sure all of you who like the game will still go out and wait in line through the harsh cold. Buy all 3 and run home so you can rub the boxes over your naked bodies and upload the videos to Pornotube so that Stephen Conroy can have an excuse to censor Australian Internet, all while you prepare to send in your recently materialised Zerg to invade Australia and force us Aussies to go to Candy Mountain while you steal our Kangaroos, Lamingtons and Kidneys.

seriously... why the hate?
rel123's Avatar
rel123 at 11/13/2008 01:10
The immense amounts of bullshit coming out of every orifice of that guy's body distracted me from whatever message he was trying to convey.
Funktastic's Avatar
Funktastic at 11/13/2008 01:38
Well considering the entire original Blizzard team that made the original Warcraft, Starcraft, and Diablo left the company, because the higher ups turned into greedy ass clowns and canned any original projects (Starcraft: Ghost, I'm looking at you) and told them to focus on World of Warcraft . . . what can you expect from the new cronies?
Drach's Avatar
Drach at 11/13/2008 02:29
They can't charge you monthly for it, so why not make you pay 3x the ammount of one game?
I honestly see this as being a horrible move on their part. You buy the first of the three, and you can't Vs Zerg or Protos? What gives, if you want the whole experience you gotta spend $150. I honestly don't see this benefiting anyone BUT the Blizzard people. Are the people on battle.net going to only be able to play as Terran until the Zerg or Protos games get released? It's like buying a copy of Diablo 2 and only being able to pick one class until you buy another copy of the game!

BULLSHIT Blizzard. Utter Bullshit.
randombullseye's Avatar
randombullseye at 11/13/2008 02:52
I don't know why, but the word BULLSHIT suddenly appeared in my mind. In giant bold lettering.
Squeewupiwupi's Avatar
Squeewupiwupi at 11/13/2008 03:53
Hardcore gamers? Hardcore Complainers is more like it.

Each of the three games has a campaign that's as long or longer than the combined 3 racial campaigns of SC1

You only have to buy the first game for full ZvTvP multiplayer gameplay.

They're not going to charge a subscription fee for Battle.net but they are going to have special features that you can pay for and/or DLC. (I asked the lead dev of Diablo III during their Blizzcon panel)
ran24's Avatar
ran24 at 11/13/2008 04:54
The only way the 3 game model is acceptable is if each game is released at $30 or less, and you know that's not happening.

And on top of that, if they are charging for Battlenet, that's just ridiculous. Getting at the minimum 2x the normal revenue from what should be one game, and then charging for online pay is the most blatant greed I have ever seen from a video game company. I really am not going to purchase this if Battlenet costs money.
Krow's Avatar
Krow at 11/13/2008 05:11
@Squeewupiwupi

So you mean, like, some people are going to have nicer things than me in SC2 and D3, breaking the perfect balance of the original RTS? WOO! THAT IS FUCKING AWESOME!
carg0's Avatar
carg0 at 11/13/2008 05:44
who does this tool think he's fooling with that line of bullshit? it's bad enough that they're selling us SC2 three times over but to stand there and tell us that it has nothing whatsoever to do with money is fuckin' insulting...
Triphoppin's Avatar
Triphoppin at 11/13/2008 12:33
I will forever be a starcraft fan, not fanboy - so it'll give me more incentive to have 2 friends buy the other campaigns so I don't have to buy 3 times the disks
Psy-Phi's Avatar
Psy-Phi at 11/14/2008 01:59
I'll believe him when they sell the games for 20 bucks a piece.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49573 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: How to respond to a videogame review





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006