Quantcast


Blizzard full of praise for Live; WoW still not coming to consoles photo

GamesIndustry.biz has an article up with snippets from an interview they conducted with Blizzard developer Itzik Ben Bassat regarding consoles, and more specifically, Blizzard's feelings towards them. The sad part is that the article seems to be hinting at Blizzard's desire to bring WoW to consoles, but in actually reading the thing, you realize it has almost no useful content whatsoever.

Here's a quick synopsis;

Bassat thinks consoles are becoming mini-PCs.

He likes Microsoft's Live service.

Blizzard is keeping an eye on consoles with a theoretical possibilty of developing something for them, maybe, at some undefined future date. 

Of course, after all of that, and the sensationalistic headline of "WOW developer keeps close eye on Sony and Microsoft", they also manage to toss in the fact that Blizzard has no plans to bring World of Warcraft to any console.

We understand that people desperately want World of Warcraft to be released on a home console, but fueling the flames of speculation with this kind of "nudge, nudge, wink, wink" journalism just wastes people's time. At the very least they could have been kind enough to be up front with their intentions, or, failing that, just outright lie about it. If you're going to jerk people around, promise them some fellatio or something.

God, I hate the Internet.

 








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

28 comments | showing # 1 to 28
prev next

ManSpirit's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:17
ManSpirit
Where does he say he likes XBL?I read he likes XBLA.
Aaron Mxy Yost's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:19
Aaron Mxy Yost
Man, playing WoW would suck on a console.
JamesSorensen's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:21
JamesSorensen
how's starcraft ghost
deadpixel's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:22
deadpixel
Blizzards biggest beef is with the consoles lack of mouse and keyboard support, which is becoming less and less of an issue. All three major consoles have USB support, hell, you can install a new OS on the PS3 and a mouse update could possibly be done on the 360, so why not Blizzard, why not?
ManSpirit's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:25
ManSpirit
Companies like Valve and Blizzard are trying to create their own online services that work great in the democratic environment of the PC world but it would clash with what MS is trying to do with Live.
ManSpirit's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:33
ManSpirit
@Earnest
You can infer what you desire, I will go by what he actually said until I read otherwise.He might be a huge fan of small games for all we know. He also earlier said :
""Online console gaming is still in its very early stages, and it needs to be developed further to provide opportunities of a scale which will be interesting to us,"
He still thinks it has room to grow,therefor the praise is not necessarily universal and certainly not unconditional.
Maybe the full or next part of the interview will be more revealing.



deiga-the-semivaliant's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 20:54
deiga-the-semivaliant
Oh man, Ghost. What the hell happened to that game? I was looking forward to tearing shit up as a zergling.
ArrestedDeveloper's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:04
ArrestedDeveloper
I'm 95% sure they have said Ghost is no longer in development. They've been trying to make it since N64 and its just not gelling together. Kind of like how they were trying to make Kameo since the N64 and we saw how that turned out.
emoyaoigamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:18
emoyaoigamer
retards ! blizzard should bring it to the 360! i have WOW on my pc, but i want it for my 360.
stangend77's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:19
stangend77
It would be interesting to know exactly what is truly holding this back from happening (Blizzard or Msoft wanting more money???) seeing as it would definitely make bank regardless of the difficulties associated with it. I for one though still cannot figure out the draw of this game though. To each their own I guess.
emoyaoigamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:19
emoyaoigamer
of maybe the big M wants some $ profit
emoyaoigamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:19
emoyaoigamer
or maybe the big M wants $ profit from wow too :?
stangend77's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:20
stangend77
Oh and before I am mobbed I do think the social aspect of it is cool, the gameplay just doesn't "do it" for me.
BahamutZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:26
BahamutZero
I think any of their games would suck on a console. what's the point? a pc as much as a ps3 will play more games better.
dormedas's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:28
dormedas
YAYS! Even more proof that the Wii is the only next-gen console to not be called a mini-PC. I mean, the Wii does what any console should do best, and that is play games. The PS3 allows you to play movies, especially blu-ray, listen to music, look at photos, and for xbox, talk over xbox live, video chat, etc.
I admit, the Wii'd virtual console aint doing so hot here in the great states, but it still does what a console does, and Nintendo sees through all the crap nowadays.
To give a few examples, cell-phones used to just call people, now you can call people, take pictures, text message, play games, download songs, and even listen to songs. MP3 players used to play songs, now they play songs, watch movies, are capable of playing games, and more.
milly's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 21:51
milly
i believe that the ms console is not powerful enough graphically to handle the world of warcraft. i think they might eventually bring it over to the ps3. i will keep my fingers crossed. nintedo's system is for casual gamers not hardcore gamers and will be good mostly for varied games such as warioware and rayman and older programs from the nintendo archives. in the next year the motion sensory technology of the nintendo will probably be available to current systems including the ms console by third party busineses.
milly's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 22:20
milly
even if the nintendo could play world of warcraft, the graphics would not be up to the standards of even the microsoft console.

the prices of low end hdtv's are dropping every week, already for $500 or less it is possible to buy an offbrand, and with this new affordability, standard television will no longer be the standard.

for $300 nintendo could have included higher end graphic capabilities, enough to push them over last generation graphics and people would have still purchased it. they made a major error by not looking ahead a year and making something that would meet the technical specifications of hdtvs.*

*in the novel Jennifer Government, which is a satirical look at a world in which capitalism has run rampant, children go to schools run by mcdonalds, and citizens take their surnames from the corporations they work at; the major plot thread is a couple of executives at nike bamboozling a worker into signing a contract to murder 10 kids who purchase a new kind of nike shoe, in order to build word of mouth marketing, to make their product must-own, must-have, etc. the wii is not really that different, fake (or real shortages - it doesn't really matter) and a fad contoller ... for a system that looks like vtech on an hdtv... etc.

i realize i departed from the subject of blizzard and world of warcraft. but, well.







Serpentish's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 22:54
Serpentish
You mean for a selling price of $300 right?
Cory_t_'s Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 23:33
Cory_t_
Even if I could use 2 controllers at once, no console would have enough buttons for me to play comfortably.
milly's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/06/2007 23:35
milly
don't ask loaded questions, sir. i don't know what that maeans either.
ArrestedDeveloper's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 00:24
ArrestedDeveloper
@Milly
I wouldn't worry about the 360s ability to handle Wow's graphics, I'd worry about PS3's online capabilities handling it. You would probably have to back out of the game to read your in-game mail and check your auctions.

In general though WoW is fine where it is on pc, it would be to much of an adjustment and end up being a disadvantage to players. You wouldn't be able to load on mods you liked, talking to people would be a pain, typing would be impossible and if they built in a vent like program I would blow my brains out, imagine the barrens chat when everyone has headsets. And an audio LFG channel, forget about it.
tehuberone's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 00:56
tehuberone
Starcraft 64 is what got me addicted to the PC version and PC gaming. Hopefully they show some support for consoles since that's how I got involved in PC gaming.

damn what was back in 6th grade...
zaqu's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 02:34
zaqu
i wish they brought starcraft 64 to the vc
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 04:22
Dot
PC has to have exclusive games, or it'll die as a gaming platform. WoW on the X360? No thanks.
Kif 's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 06:30
Kif
Blizzard; Diablo 3 for the 360. GOGOGO
Aaron Mxy Yost's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 07:29
Aaron Mxy Yost
Can you imagine being in a UBRS pug where your group keeps getting killed because some moron is playing with a gamepad? Arrested Developer already mentioned the slice of hell that a Barrens audio channel would be and how addons would be gimped. If they made WoW for a console, Blizzard would have to dumb it down to the lowest common denominator. FFXI was developed with both consoles and PCs in mind. WoW wasn't. It's not like Blizzard needs more money.
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/07/2007 13:18
Dot
"Computers are simply too ubiquitous (and too easy to develop for) to ever stop being a viable platform for gaming."
Depends on what you define as gaming. If you mean "casual games", then sure. But if you count in the actual "hardcore"(for the lack of a better word) games, there still have to be games exclusive to the PC to convince the average crowd that there is actually a point to buying a nice gaming rig(read: no integrated graphics) instead of/along with a console.
That said, for me, the PC will always remain my preferred gaming platform.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!