Quantcast


Blizzard donates big money to Make-A-Wish photo

Blizzard Entertainment opened up their mighty coffers this month and made a spectacular 1.1 million dollar donation to the Make-A-Wish Foundation, a charity that gives children with life-threatening problems "impactful" experiences. The developer also opened up its studio to 15 of the foundation's children, giving them a special sneak peek at how MMO World of Warcraft is made.

While we'd love to make this story all about the great work Make-A-Wish does, there's something to be said of where the Blizzard's donation came from: 50 percent of November and December's sales of the Pandaren Monk World of Warcraft pet. Think about that. Over a two-month period, a lone digital pet netted Blizzard 2.2 million dollars.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

35 comments | showing # 1 to 35
prev next

TheDirtyHeadband's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:04
TheDirtyHeadband
well aint that sweet of them.
Furyfire's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:08
Furyfire
Its great about the donation.. however... a pet... in WoW.

I will now promptly smash my head into my desk.
pedrovay2003's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:12
pedrovay2003
Wow... That pet thing is ridiculous. I'm glad they donated so much money to a good cause, but I just COMPLETELY gave up on humanity.
HEL105's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:13
HEL105
They're dear sweethearts, those Blizzard folks :-)
kefkaesque's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:19
kefkaesque
@x1251

The kids who came in were probably WoW fanboys. To a little kid who's obsessed with the game that's probably a big deal.

Then again I'm just assuming this.
ace of knaves's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:22
ace of knaves
I've never felt such a strange mix of admiration and revulsion. I suppose the ends justify the means...?
Psy-Phi's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:27
Psy-Phi
Damnit, I've been duped! I bought the Pandaren with the understanding that all 10 of those dollars were going to the MaWF :(
Airbr1dge's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:45
Airbr1dge
There so evil.. Yet good .. Yet evil.....
king kong five's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:48
king kong five
Fifty percent? Seriously? I mean it's great that they're doing this, but why limit it to 50% when they could have given all the proceeds and not have felt the difference?
Havoc Fang's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:50
Havoc Fang
"a charity that gives children life-threatening problems" is how I read it.
VGFreak1225's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 21:59
VGFreak1225
2.2 mil?!?

That's Steam Holiday Sale stupid!
Changston's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:02
Changston
Was the pet advertised as "If you buy me, 50% of your money will go to charity?" That would make more sense.
Changston's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:05
Changston
I was kind of stupid and didn't see the link. It was, so maybe that drove some people to justify buying it.
bluemeep's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:08
bluemeep
I know someone that bought two.
Andrew Cornelius's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:10
Andrew Cornelius
"Fifty percent? Seriously? I mean it's great that they're doing this, but why limit it to 50% when they could have given all the proceeds and not have felt the difference?"
Are you really knocking a 1.1 million dollar donation? They could have just as easily not given any, and have it function like their Lich pet. I think it's an admirable gesture to donate at all, especially such a large amount.
VGFreak1225's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:18
VGFreak1225
@Changston
Even then, that's still a crap-ton of sales.
Volomon's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:22
Volomon
I could be wrong but don't all the pet earnings go to charity, this might be one of many organizations.
VGFreak1225's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:37
VGFreak1225
@Volomon
Well it looks like there's only two in the Blizzard store, and the other one isn't labeled with an organization. But I don't play WoW, I'm not familiar with all the pets. Are there any other methods of getting pets?
Andrew Cornelius's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 22:59
Andrew Cornelius
@VGFreak
The game is filled with various vanity pets, some gained from vendors using in game currency, others from achievements or by raising your reputation with certain factions. The pet store is a new addition, starting with the lich and panda pets, and now they're adding the griffin and windrider.
maxman14's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 23:00
maxman14
@VGFreak1225:

tons. theres an ingame achievement for getting over 75 I believe (you dont need to buy any to get this).

http://warcraftpets.com/wow.pets/index.asp
DrRockso's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 23:10
DrRockso
@ x1251

Except, you know, its called Make a Wish foundation. And, you know, this may just be hearsay, but the child actually MAKES A WISH OF THEIR OWN, and the foundation helps make it happen.

Jesus. I don't know why you even try sometimes.
VGFreak1225's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 23:10
VGFreak1225
Okay, but do any of them involve donating money to charities? That's what I want to know.
hpv's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2010 23:53
hpv
Andrew Cornelius: They have what, 7 million subscribers at $15/month? Yeah, I'll knock them for only donating half.
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 01:21
Rammstein
I bought the pets. Cause $10 is $10. I got them both because they were cute as fuck in-game and the Panda had 50% charity proceeds. So my conscience is clean.
NuDimon's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 02:16
NuDimon
I wonder how much that other pet sold...
Pyramid Head's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 05:31
Pyramid Head
Way to blow a million.
Necron117's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 11:29
Necron117
Good on Blizzard, true champions.
Courtney Roberts's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 11:34
Courtney Roberts
@Gillium-001

You arent getting the point. its nice that they've done something charitable, but its marred by the fact that they have earned $1.1 mil over it, rather than giving it all to charity.

A significant amount of the sales would have been made just to make that charitable donation, as a statement by the consumer to say, do more things for charity, and we'll support you, and blizzard are pocketing it.

no-one is saying that the charity isnt accepted, and im sure that many people will benefit. It's all a bit underhand thats all
Shadelow's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 12:40
Shadelow
@ Courtney Roberts

How is it even slightly underhanded? It's a corporation, they are in the business of making money, that is what they DO, that is what whoever you work for does, (assuming you work). Following your "logic" if a company donates ANYTHING at all to charity and it doesn't total the amount that earned at the time of their donation then it is under-handed.... Take a look at 90% of charities, MOST only actually use 25-50% of the donations they actually receive the rest goes to covering the costs of operating. STFU
Rosseh's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 13:09
Rosseh
Charity is the new confession.
Courtney Roberts's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 13:09
Courtney Roberts
@shadelow

You missed the social implicarions. i dont care about the money. at all. they can carry on raking in the cash which is what they do best, im not a hater. Infact them doing this was a really nice thing to do.

charity doesnt come cheap. if we as consumers dont keep marks on corporations like actiblizz then what is there. how is us ignoring the fact that they didnt really do this for charity but as an afterthought, which is a lovely gesture and i support them for it, going to help anyone.

If you dont like me using the word underhand, then fine. but it's immoral to me not to raise the point that the way of charity completely undermines the act.
Courtney Roberts's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 13:14
Courtney Roberts
@shadelow

before you retort, you're offering a completely different perspective than what im arguing against. donating to charity and keeping a lot of profit = lush.

Selling a product based on its charity value and then making more money than you give to charity= morally wrong
Johnny Justice's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2010 13:23
Johnny Justice
Charity is the new sex.
Shadelow's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/19/2010 14:28
Shadelow
@ Courtney Roberts

And how did they make more money off that vanity pet then they donated?

They made 2.2 million, donated 1.1 million. That's 50%.
Courtney Roberts's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/20/2010 14:42
Courtney Roberts
@shadelow

People will buy the object past the charity window because they have been alerted to it by the charity scheme. its still on sale.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!