Quantcast


Blizzard: Battle.net will always be free photo

Every time any major news comes out about a Blizzard game, rumors always start to swirl around that Blizzard is going to start charging for Battle.net. Since I had never heard any official statement, I decided to find out for myself what the deal was.

I spoke to Chris Sigaty, the Lead Producer of StarCraft II, and asked him if Blizzard is, was, or will ever plan on charging for Battle.net. His answer?

"Battle.net will not be a pay service. By buying the game, you will be able to match and play with other people."

There you go. Free Battle.net for everyone! (Who buys a Blizzard game.)








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jonathan Ross is an Associate Editor in Los Angeles who is obsessed with capybaras. Like, seriously, obsessed. If he's not playing Team Fortress 2 or getting into arguments about why PC gaming is superior, he's either off having a fancy dinner with lots of expensive wine, or sitting on the Destructoid IRC complaining that's he's not off having a fancy dinner. Likes: Chrono Trigger, Street Fighter, Steam, everything Blizzard and Valve have ever made, playing Angry Birds on the toilet. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

15 comments | showing # 1 to 15
prev next

eternalplayer2345's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 18:35
eternalplayer2345
I am buying diablo 3 again hooray!
TehBuLL's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 18:38
TehBuLL
Of course,if you want BNet Gold Service with Ladders and Tournaments...ugh.
Yehat's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 19:08
Yehat
The debuting feature of Battlenet that came with Diablo 1 was that "hey it's free unlike Tennet and Dwango!". Since then it has always been free for any non-MMO online PC game service. In this day and age it's financial suicide to charge any sort of subscription for a PC gaming service unless it's an MMO.

Amusingly since then the last two recent attempts to actually charge for 'premium' online PC gaming service were both done by Microsoft and both flew like lead tractors: Allegiance Net and Games for Windows Live GOLD.
Catmurderer's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 19:19
Catmurderer
Subscription fee for LAN?


lololol
Dan CiTi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 19:26
Dan CiTi
Now as long as the games are good, I'll buy them.
ShadowKirby's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 19:59
ShadowKirby
Pirate: Bastards want me to BUY the game to play online for free !
yutt's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 20:10
yutt
Phew. I am a WoW subscriber since release, but I was very worried that WoW + Activision was leaning Blizzard toward trying to double their infinite money with Battle.net subscriptions.

@ShadowKirby
Yeah, no one said that but strawmen are fun to beat up!
realyst's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 21:49
realyst
Free, but no doubt still with ads. To play your LAN games.

Sorry, still not buying Blizzard's still alive somewhere in the Activision monster.
Arttemis's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 22:41
Arttemis
Absolutely great news! I was genuinely expecting Blizzard to start charging for at least part of BNet's service.

I'm still upset about StarCraft II's lack of LAN, but now I can forgo all suspicion and feel completely excited about [/i]Diablo III[i], which I'll be playing it as it was intended: online over BNet with thousands of other people.
SmashDash's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 23:48
SmashDash
I'm counting the seconds until Activision steps in.
yeti5d's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/17/2009 23:58
yeti5d
@TehBuLL
hehe yeah, I could see that coming.
Knivy's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2009 00:08
Knivy
Wait, people want to play online? then why the hell is everyone complaining about the LAN thing? :P
KrazyKraut's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2009 06:36
KrazyKraut
@Knives
because it is one of games that is played on the most lans out there...it is like valve would deactivate lan support for their next Counter-Strike...
Mr Kite's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2009 19:51
Mr Kite
Yay! Mr Kite approves.
Nintendragon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/22/2009 01:57
Nintendragon
I'd hope Activision has no desire to step in -- Blizzard does alright doing their own thing, and I think they will leave well enough alone...at least that'd be my philosophy on the matter! :D
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!