Quantcast


Blitz working on 'true 3D games.' Yes, just like Freddy's Dead! photo

Blitz Games Studios has been showing off some in-house technology that can make stereoscopic 3D gaming a reality on the PS3 and 360. Thanks to the tech, game consoles have the ability to replicate the kind of hi-def 3D visuals found in places like the IMAX cinema or that place in the Science Museum where you have to line up for thirty minutes to get in.

"This is an incredibly exciting and huge step forward for videogames," claims Blitz's chief tech officer, Andrew Oliver. "Our BlitzTech technology will prove beyond all doubt that we are already doing what some industry experts have said is impossible on today's game consoles. Our highly tuned engine is capable of producing real-time interactive graphics that are close to offline rendered CG movie quality."

Interesting. I must say that the "immersion" Blitz promises could make for some interesting gameplay experiences, but I definitely can't see it being the industry standard. 3D "pop out" visuals have always been a gimmick, and tend to be a bit too busy to ensure a completely enjoyable experience.

That said, I'd sure as hell play a gimmicky 3D game and probably love it.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

16 comments | showing # 1 to 16
prev next

DeusPayne's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:07
DeusPayne
I make my games pseudo 3d the old fashion way. Geting blitzed before playing them.
J03yyz's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:07
J03yyz
my geforce 1 shipped with 3d goggles in '99
this is nothing new. companies every couple years try to tout this as being their own and "new and exciting" but end up disappearing less than a year later.
John B's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:10
John B
They must be talking about flipping frames where one eye sees ones frame and the other eye sees the other frame. Regular TVs can't product a polarizing effect to work with the non-electronic types of cheapy, plastic frames. Alternating frames isn't exactly "proprietary" technology.

Hell, I'd be glad just to see a game in a well-tuned red/blue 3D! We had 3D back with Magic Carpet, one of the best games ever. It had both red/blue anaglyph 3D as well as "Magic Eye" 3D.

IMAX-style, stereoscopic 3D -- that would be fantastic, assuming that the hardware didn't cost as much as the console.
John B's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:13
John B
Oh, hold on ... I read the article with a bit more detail.

"Many TV manufacturers are already selling sets capable of displaying 3D imagery and we envisage that these sets will rapidly gain popularity as content in the form of movies and games becomes available."

Okay, fuck these guys. They're waiting for the new 3D TVs to come into play. Bullshit. I just bought my HDTV last year. There's no way in hell I'm buying a new "3D" TV just to play one of their fucking games.

ALL TV'S CAN DISPLAY 3D, you stupid oiks! I have a VHS tape from over 15 years ago of "Hondo" in 3D with red/blue anaglyph glasses, and there have been IMAX-style flip-lense hardware out for over 10 years.

These guys can kiss my ass.
galagabug 's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:32
galagabug
commercial 3d displays will hit the market in 2009. apparently no additional hardware (like glasses) are required on the part of the viewer for this new tech. i think we'll see some cool ass shit at CES this year.
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:36
Qraze
john, i read no mention or insinuation that we need a new tv. its an engine by a game studio, not a electronics company.

this is very interesting though, i won't hold my breath though.
John B's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 09:54
John B
He says it right there in the article.

"Many TV manufacturers are already selling sets capable of displaying 3D imagery and we envisage that these sets will rapidly gain popularity as content in the form of movies and games becomes available. Our technology allows for our games to run in both 2D and 3D in one version - by simply flicking a 'switch' between them. It really has to be seen to be believed," he added.

By putting those sentences together like that, he is saying that the new engine is going to be dependent on the new 3D technology that has been recently announced. This new technology allows for "sweet spots" where you can see a stereoscopic 3D image on your TV without special hardware, just like you can now with lenticular 3D images that have been around for decades.
Slique's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 10:17
Slique
I was actually selected to go to an open day at Blitz's headquaters last year, and I've got to admit that I really wasn't impressed. The studio pretty much survives off children's license games, and as such doesn't seem to spend much time with original IP's. The two original games I did see I haven't heard of since (like, at all), so I imagine this latest venture will probably go the same way and never reach fruition.
Touch's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 10:57
Touch
Ah, the move towards 3-D gaming. I first heard about this near the start of the year, on the excellent (but now sadly deleted) industry blog, "Surfer girl reviews Star Wars". Whoever was respnsible for that blog (and she was definitely in the games industry, and relatively high up the chain) said that loads of devs are looking into 3-D, so get used to the idea, because it's coming!
John B's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 11:04
John B
They can bring on the 3D gaming all they want. They just need to make it compatible with existing TVs using hardware and technology that has been available for a while. Just don't force me to buy a new "3D" TV to get that!

Alternating lens hardware has been out for well over a decade and works with all conventional TV sets. There is no excuse for ignoring that and expecting people to buy new TVs.
akathatoneguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 11:07
akathatoneguy
I remember seeing Freddy's Dead in theaters! We were supposed to go see Necessary Roughness (Scott Bakula ftw!) and we convinced my mom to go see some Freddy action instead. It wasn't too bad!

I'm a Freddy fan, but I disagree with many of them on which ones were good. The first and third we all agree on, but most people don't give the sixth any credit, which I think it deserves. New Nightmare was also quite good IMO. I also liked Freddy vs. Jason, but then again I'll take whatever I can get at this point.
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 12:18
TheBigFeel
John B is smart: confirmed!

Tell me about this alternating lens hardware that wouldn't require new equipment purchase. Are you talking about a lenticular overlay? (digression: spell check thinks I misspelled 'testicular'). Those have sweet spots, and not many of them, plus they need to be very precisely calibrated to your television size, pixel density, and screenglass thickness. Then there's interlaces polarization filters combined with glasses. Those have the same calibration problems, but provided you're not too far above/below the screen, there isn't the "sweet spot" problem. I do see home tv's working with glasses very soon.. Everything would run in 1080i, where odd fields are left eye and evens are right.
Until then, it's the good ol' red and cyan approach (which lets you retain a reasonably colored image)
psycho terror2's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 12:20
psycho terror2
lol slique, i was invited to blitz a couple weeks ago and refused. you're right in saying their portfolio is somewhat pathetic. after playing reservoir dogs i don't think i could have kept a straight face.

on a lighter note though, i remember playing Painkiller with stereoscopic 3D glasses on my 6800gt. although the glasses were kind of annoying and gave you a headache, the level on the rollercoaser was truly badass.

i personally can't wait to get one of these new displays. the technology is much better than anaglyph or stereoscopic 3D, and 3D gaming really is the next logical step.

@john B

stop whining. 3D gaming will not take off unless it's done properly, and that WILL require you to buy a new TV.
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 12:27
TheBigFeel
As for 3d being a gimmick, Jim: Every new technology rides the gimmick train for a while until it realizes it's missed its stop. When motion pictures first came onto the scene, the first movies were literally of crowds of people walking around. yeah.. boooooring, and nothing but capitalization of the "ohh.. moving pictures" gimmick.

Stereo is finally being applied more subtley. We're making decisions now (in film, at least) to make it less distracting. Compare "Bolt" to "Journey to the Center of the Earth ThreeDEEEE". Soon, we'll start using it for things we literally can't do in a flat image.

3DOMG! is gonna suck for a little while in games. Once you see a 3d image on a small screen and start moving your head side to side, you'll see why: you'll get sick. But pair it with Johnny's kickass head tracking (which makes wearing glasses less of an issue), and well, I'm pretty excited about playing something like that.
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2008 12:34
TheBigFeel
Sorry for the comment flooding, hopefully at least one other person finds this as interesting as I do.

Here's a (very quick) example of the stereo + head tracking I just found. look's like it's been out a while
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Bfvu7JWAZY

I'm pretty certain that 3d gaming with require both of these effects to be more than a gimmick. This unfortunately hurts the spectator aspect of gaming. If you thought your girlfriend got bored watching you play games _before_, well, now she'll be bored and sick, too.
The Amazing Shenazin's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/05/2008 03:49
The Amazing Shenazin
lol @ The Freddy's Dead reference
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!