My issue has never really been that the Call of Duty games have been bad, I mostly just object to the fact that they're exploited with yearly releases.
How is that even be a topic of debate? Futuristic setting or otherwise, they WILL come back. I've no doubt about that.
What kind of 'gameplay' is that? Hooking a duck at a fair is more challenging.
It thoroughly entertains me that A) a lot of a popular thing, or B) a popular thing that there's a lot of, will inevitably lead to a "souring of opinions."
Fucking hipster gamers.
Right now given the situation with the remnants of IW in regards to making future CoD games in question, it brings up the spectre of MW2, where the game pretty much got abandoned during the whole mess with West and Zampella, leaving huge and massive oversights in gameplay balance online, leaving it a massive clusterfuck to this day, and that's before we factor in hackers who can leap over 200 feet in the air and one-man newb-tube you with reckless abandon, ruining an otherwise solid and fun multiplayer.
This is really the question I want to have someone with access to Treyarch to ask them. "Are you going to diligent in supporting this game's online for several YEARS after launch rather than just a few months? Are you going to be committed to balance and squashing bugs?" Hopefully since they are using the future setting to shake things up a lot of this will hopefully be addressed from the outset, but a big problem with CoD is its longevity as Activision's desire to keep churning out yearly installments is killing the prior game's online as they basically abandon it for the next game. They should take a page out of Blizzard's book and set aside a team to keep working on the older games from time to time to keep interest in those games alive. At the very least it will show good will towards your customers.
Also lol at EA. Their games these days ring about as hollow as their business practices and business culture. I think what people like about Treyarch is their humility, which is sorely lacking in gaming right now.
If it wasn't of Infinity Ward's more recent titles in the franchise, I'm absolutely sure the backlash against Call of Duty would be much smaller. But hey, capitalism isn't that kind.
EA on the other hand shipped a game where the voice chat on PS3 didn't initially work well, where grouping up and playing with friends was difficult... and then they got rid of the standard servers leaving gamers with player servers where they had to play odd modes and run the risk of getting booted.
I'll take something that "works" (or is VERY quickly fixed) rather than something that doesn't work.
Call of Duty isn't the best online game I've played... but it works. (and the campaigns are reliably fun and well done).
It may be a radical attitude to have amongst the ''hardcore'', but I sincerely wish Treyarch and Activision well with Black Ops 2 and hope they turn out another stellar product.
How many? The majority? Or is it still a small subset of official servers? I haven't been playing because the game as a whole seemed like an immediate cash-in, with no support after launch. The party system and voice chat on the PS3 made me more frustrated than I think I have ever been at a video game.
Also, if you think I'm just being bitchy about the difference in quality between CoD 4 and MW3, just play both of them back to back. It's like night and day.
And getting new Zombies maps made paying $15 seem justifiable, because those things have tons of replay value.
Give me much better graphics, real classes (kz, bf) and id give it a shot. I love trashing cod, but only because its so goddamn easy to do so.
How can any dev put that game out and be like yea we da best. When your competition is stomping you. Or switch genres. Call it an arena shooter.
If the leaked info is to be believed, there will still be customized loadouts. You'll have 10 "Allocation Points" and guns and perks cost different points, and you can use the unlocked perks/guns/etc. any way you want. So apparently you can do stuff like select nothing but perks and start with only a knife. Or have a bunch of weapons with no perks. Or anything in between. Pretty sweet (if true).
WTF o_O Are they still doing zombies crap? And they're positioning themselves as unique somehow? Look around you guys, every other game has zombies.
Doesn't matter if it does or not. You'll still give it a good score based on nothing other than it plays the way it should and then criticize other games and franchises for not changing anything.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow





























follow










