Bioshock should stay in the consoles capable of it, the Wii is a big fail

Well, using your wiimote motion control to use plasmids or something will allow to free up one button for some other commands like jump, shoot, use, etc.

If motion controls were done subtly, it would be impossible to get the movements exactly right. When they aren't subtle, you look like someone looks while playing a wii fighting game, with that expression of frustrated hopefull confusion on your face. The sad fact is, if developers mimick gamer's movements too precisely, we'll all discover how shit we are at everything. Devs - there is nothing wrong with controllers for games like this. My nan has no desire to play bioshock. Word.

@Jim

fair enough. It's true I stopped reading kotaku because I'm not interested in the novelization of news stories

Hahaha, this is like when they announced bioshock for the mac at the original $50 price tag.

Lakai: Check back in twelve minutes!

I like buttons but it might be fun to put my hand up and shock a splicer or something.

I loved the interface for Metroid Prime 3, playing Bioshock with a similar interface would be heavenly.

I don't think Bioshock would do very well on a Wii. The beauty and detail of Rapture is half the draw of the game. If you ran it on a wii it would probably just look blocky, dark, and extremely dull.

I don't think a BioShock Wii is necessary, but I can't stand playing the PS360 versions due to my dislike of dual-analogue (I like my keyboard and mouse very much thank you).

However, I don't know why 'subtlety' even needs to be mentioned. Obviously, any Wii FPS would best utilize a Metroid Prime 3 scheme, which isn't even CLOSE to waggle.

Why is it so ingrained in these Western developers' (and players' as well, it seems) minds that Wii = waggle, that that's the only use of motion control? It's like saying, "Oh, I dunno about making a game for traditional controllers, we'd have to keep the button mashing 'subtle'" -- why is it assumed arbitrary input for an interface is the 'standard'? It should be a given that control schemes of any type should be implemented in an elegant fashion.

Really, I think it has all to do with preconceptions and the industry's bias against the Wii and, by extension, motion control. If developers didn't take the HD consoles seriously, didn't understand "button controls", and made only button mashing games, would that take away from the potential of the interface? There are ways to take advantage of motion control beyond waggle, but it can be difficult to see that if an people refuse to look past the "Carnival Games" of the industry.

And then I don't know why this stigma is applied to the Wii Remote, but not the Arc or Natal (especially Natal...). It's going to be really difficult for HD developers to take full advantage of the two when, up to now, they have tried their best to ignore any potential gameplay opportunities.

Well...if this game WERE made for the Wii, we would find out really fast if people actually liked it for its intriguing story and unique gameplay systems, or if was mainly just the shiny pictures.