Quantcast


BioShock 2 gets multiplayer details and Dark Sector devs photo

2K Games has today announced that BioShock 2's "extensive" multiplayer features will be created by Dark Sector developer Digital Extremes. The studio will be working closely with 2K Marin on the game, using its multiplayer experience to compliment 2K's single-player game.

"The fans asked for a multiplayer experience and we answered," says 2K president Christoph Hartmann. "With Digital Extremes delivering a multiplayer experience for BioShock 2 that features all of the things that make BioShock unique, we’re holding ourselves to a high standard so that we can deliver the depth and variety that fans of the BioShock universe demand."

Some hot multiplayer details have also been announced. Players will gain experience, very much like promotions in Call of Duty or Killzone 2. Experience will yield new weapons and Plasmids, and there will be a lot of character customization. Apparently, this is also where the "prequel" element comes in, as it's been advertised that players will experience the "fall of Rapture" in the multiplayer. Hmm. 

Dark Sector actually had a surprisingly good multiplayer section, despite its weak campaign mode, so this could be promising news. It's also telling that 2K isn't willing to compromise the single-player aspect to stuff in multiplayer. What do you make of this fresh development? Good idea to bring in Digital Extremes, or should 2K Marin be handling the lot?

Oh, and that's the new official logo for the game in the header.

New York, NY – May 8, 2009... 2K Games, a publishing label of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTWO), announced today that it has signed a partnership with Digital Extremes to develop the multiplayer experience for BioShock® 2. Under this partnership, Digital Extremes is working closely with the creative team at 2K Marin to develop a new and substantial element that enhances the lore and fiction of the BioShock universe.

“The fans asked for a multiplayer experience and we answered,” said Christoph Hartmann, president of 2K. “With Digital Extremes delivering a multiplayer experience for BioShock 2 that features all of the things that make BioShock unique, we’re holding ourselves to a high standard so that we can deliver the depth and variety that fans of the BioShock universe demand.”

Multiplayer in BioShock 2 provides a rich prequel experience that expands the origins of the BioShock fiction. Set during the fall of Rapture, players assume the role of a Plasmid test subject for Sinclair Solutions, a premier provider of Plasmids and Tonics in the underwater city of Rapture that was first explored in the original BioShock. Players will need to use all the elements of the BioShock toolset to survive as the full depth of the BioShock experience is refined and transformed into a unique multiplayer experience that can only be found in Rapture.

Key features:

• Evolution of the genetically enhanced shooter – Earn experience points during gameplay to earn access to new Weapons, Plasmids and Tonics that can be used to create hundreds of different combinations, allowing players to develop a unique character that caters to their playing style.

• Extend the Rapture fiction – Players will step into the shoes of Rapture citizens and learn more about the fall of Rapture as they progress through the experience.

• See Rapture before the fall – Experience Rapture before it was reclaimed by the ocean and engage in combat over iconic environments in locations such as Kashmir Restaurant and Mercury Suites, all of which have been reworked from the ground up to deliver a fast-paced multiplayer experience.

• FPS veterans add their touch to the multiplayer experience – Digital Extremes brings more than 10 years of first person shooter experience including development of award-winning entries in the Unreal® and Unreal Tournament® franchise.

BioShock 2 is currently in development at 2K Marin, 2K Australia and Digital Extremes for PLAYSTATION®3 computer entertainment system, Xbox 360® video game and entertainment system from Microsoft and Windows-based PCs. This title is not yet rated by the ESRB.







More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

42 comments | showing # 1 to 42
prev next

Krusayder's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:20
Krusayder
I'm cautiously optimistic, it will be interesting to see how two different studios working on different aspects of the game will turn out. Has that ever been done before? As long as the single player experience isn't being sacrificed however I think it will turn out alright.
aaronf's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:24
aaronf
"The fans asked for a multiplayer experience and we answered,"

Why do people insist that all games must have multiplayer these days?
RAB's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:34
RAB
not a huge fan of the game logo for this one. seems lazy.
Kpax's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:34
Kpax
I don't remember ever asking for a multiplayer experience...

I wouldn't think that multiplayer would work for a game like Bioshock, but this description makes me think that, assuming that they don't fuck it up, this could be a very unique and entertaining experience.
IroN1c's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:34
IroN1c
Hmm, Digital Extremes has worked on some better multiplayer games (UT03/04) and some fucking weak ones (Warpath anyone?) so I remain highly sceptical.
kidko's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:36
kidko
@Krusayder GRAW2 multiplayer was developed by Red Storm while the campaign was internal Ubisoft, i believe Paris
Soulwax's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 10:42
Soulwax
@Krusayder The Brothers In Arms: Hell's Highway multiplayer was developed by another team and that turned out to be piss poor.
grasslunatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:15
grasslunatic
I don't really care, all I want is for the single player to be good.
Janledroxa's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:36
Janledroxa
@ Kpax: You're not all the fans.

-Though I must say i think I would rather my rapture experience to be solely single player, but if the MP is TEH AWESOM!!!!11!! i'll play it, this shouldn't raise any hate, since the removal of the MP option would be as simple as not pressing "A" or "X" at the MP option on the title screen.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:41
Jim Sterling
Are there seriously this few people with an opinion? BIG NEWS HERE PEOPLES!
Primo's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:41
Primo
LOL@RAB

I completely agree.
Corican's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:43
Corican
*whispers*
I still haven't played Bioshock...
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:44
Rammstein
"Why do people insist that all games must have multiplayer these days?"

Like it or not:

Multiplayer = replayability.

I never played Bioshock 1 more than enough hours to beat the game, however, if there was multiplayer(and GOOD mp at that) I would have played it longer.

If Bioshock 2 was to be SINGLEplayer only, I would have rented it oly and not bought it like I did part 1(I only bought THAT because of the gay nerd hype overwhelming my conscience).

Singleplayer = Rental = 2K gets less moneys = no more sequels = "gamers" bitch and moan about not getting more, and we have another (insert-game-that-fagboys-cry-about-needing-a-sequel-to here)
Trevkor's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:48
Trevkor
I'm not big on multiplayer shooters anymore, though if they do it well, more power to them. It seems after CoD, more devs are leaning towards the RPG-esque, experience point rank system, whatever the fuck you wanna call it. I like it, but I find it interesting that it's become so popular.
nukka jdav's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 11:53
nukka jdav
@Hoborg

.......
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:02
Rammstein
@Hoborg

rage-nerds like you make me giggle inside.

Like I said before, I beat the game. However many hours it takes to beat Bio1, however, add REPLAYABILITY and I will be on that shit longer.

What's the CHEAPEST and EASIEST way to add replayability that most developers take instead of making a compelling game?

MULTI

FUCKING

PLAYER

GTFO.
gatorsax2010's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:14
gatorsax2010
@Rammstein

"What's the CHEAPEST and EASIEST way to add replayability that most developers take instead of making a compelling game? "

Interestingly enough, 2K DID make a compelling game the first time around.

That said, I'm cautiously optimistic. Working as a "plasmid tester" is an interesting solution to the "how do we make multiplayer work in Bioshock" problem. Don't know how I feel about seeing too much of Rapture before it fell, but this could be interesting.
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:23
Rammstein
@gatorsax2010

"Don't know how I feel about seeing too much of Rapture before it fell, but this could be interesting."

-
That's where my theory comes in that this game takes place before Bioshock 1(you play as the FIRST big daddy? WTF were those huge mofos i was killing, called?), and Bioshock 3 will take place before Bioshock 2, LOST style.

Wait and see...........ive said too mu--
Timmeh's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:23
Timmeh
Multiplayer doesn't equal replayability if it sucks. Besides, I probably played Bioshock for more hours in total than Halo 3. I hate fucktards that think games are only worth purchasing if they have multiplayer.

Fuck, I better stop buying books, movies and music and stick to using the library because none of those things have multiplayer.

I like how Rammstein approves of developers taking the "cheapest and easiest" route to extending their game. Way to go.
CelicaCrazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:24
CelicaCrazed
Multiplayer Bioshock?? Just like with Uncharted I'll stay optimistic.

Also, this can so now be Heroes: The Video Game. Wait, did I really just say that?? Ugh.
Karma-Suture's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:25
Karma-Suture
Bioshock multiplayer is a waste of time and money. And it's the fault of everybody that, like Hoborg says, just can't stand the fact that they aren't allowed the option of playing a mode that they will honestly never tear themselves away from real MP experiences like CoD or Halo to play.

That, and retard game journos who feel the need to criticize single-player games for not offering some kind of multiplayer, when it would very obviously contribute nothing to the game experience, nor the genre's landscape.

Solution? Developers grow balls and say "No". Standards don't automatically set themselves, after all.
aaronf's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:39
aaronf
@Rammstein:

Tacking on a half-assed multiplayer mode that people will play for a few hours and get bored will not add any replayability.

Secondly, games like Fallout 3 have NO multiplayer whatsoever, yet there are so many paths you can take that you can't get around to the first time, you have to play it multiple times to see all the story angles. That's real replayability.
aaronf's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:41
aaronf
Also, just because a game is from the first person perspective does not automatically mean multiplayer is mandatory.
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 12:47
Rammstein
@Timmeh

Let's be honest here, Bioshock was as time consuming as well, a 5 hour game can be.

Why would i waste $60+ on a short period of time? It'd be like jizzing inside a chick and then having 18 years of regret/misery.

And just because YOU spent more time with Bio than Gaylo3[which I wouldn't even sully my gamertag by inserting that coaster (you can check)] doesn't mean that's the norm. Now since I dislike Gaylo, I can believe your claim. Say you were to spend more gaming hours on Bio than CoD4 I would either call you out or call you a freak however that would STILL not be the norm.

Look at an awesomely fun game like The Darkness and then look at the horribleness that is its multiplayer. At least Bio2 cant be worse than that ;)
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 13:01
Sharpless
Good games do not need multiplayer. Period.

That said, I'd try this.
VaeVictus's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 13:02
VaeVictus
That's an interesting take on it Rammstein, lol.

Having beaten Bioshock at least 4 times, I can say that I would have loved a multiplayer for the 1st one and that I am glad they are actually putting one into Bioshock 2. I hear this "done right" comment used a lot. What game won't suck if it's not "done right?"

Ultimately, if they have the branching of abilities thorough enough to differentiate upgrading your character from everyone else and retain the good single player aspects (graphics, controls, sound etc) then the multiplayer will be a blast.
Noah's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 13:31
Noah
I'm with the rest of you feeling that this is forced... but with Plasmids this might be the closest thing I'll ever get to a new Phantom Dust so I'm excited to try it anyways
pedrovay2003's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 13:57
pedrovay2003
I agree with aaronf on this one. Bioshock doesn't need multiplayer.
Wexx's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 14:22
Wexx
I haven't heard a single fan say that Bioshock should've had multiplayer.
Chronic Logic's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 14:29
Chronic Logic
I'm not really that comfortable about Bioshock 2 having multiplayer. I mean I don't know what game modes they have for multiplayer, but if you think about it, Bioshock multiplayer is just guns with magic. I remember the first Bioshock gameplay correctly, what's there to customize? They're probably going to make you carry only a two or three guns at a time, and a only a couple of plasmids right? This might seem interesting at first, but I can see this getting old.
D-Nez's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 15:09
D-Nez
If going around shooting people with bees and stabbing them with drills turns out to be fun, what's the damage? It's not out of the realm of possibilities that the game could turn out ok. Marin isn't taking away resources from the campaign development so worst case if you don't bothereoth MP. It's not costing you extra - stop yet bitching. It might not be Halo 3 or CoD but that doesn't mean developers should stop trying to make comelling multilayer experiences.I agree that not all shooters need MP or Co-op for that matter, however, if they aren't stretching resources by trying to develop single player and MP then I'm all for it
D-Nez's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 15:09
D-Nez
If going around shooting people with bees and stabbing them with drills turns out to be fun, what's the damage? It's not out of the realm of possibilities that the game could turn out ok. Marin isn't taking away resources from the campaign development so worst case if you don't bothereoth MP. It's not costing you extra - stop yet bitching. It might not be Halo 3 or CoD but that doesn't mean developers should stop trying to make comelling multilayer experiences.I agree that not all shooters need MP or Co-op for that matter, however, if they aren't stretching resources by trying to develop single player and MP then I'm all for it
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 16:14
Rammstein
What D-Nez said ^^^

What I say vvv

Multiplayer = more sales. PERIOD.

I can't understand why you fangirls keep kidding yourself that developers give a shit about you(see: ROCK-BAND).

Ken Levine wants your MONEYS, not your adoration. Adoration doesn't make the payments on his new Ferrari.

I love this industry. The consumers are such gullible fools.
MrSlippery's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 16:51
MrSlippery
Co-Op big daddy battles? I'm in.

oh wait, my friend just backstabbed me in taking him down and took the adam for himself, what a dick.
PrinnyMedic's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 17:52
PrinnyMedic
Dark Days are gonna stay for a while maybe hopefully things change by 2012
Drewcifer000's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 18:50
Drewcifer000
I hope you start out as a person and the more experience an plasmids you get you slowly turn into a splicer. That would be cool.

I guess as long as nothing in the campaign mode is sacrificed, the multiplayer will be interesting to say the least.
The Amazing Shenazin's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 18:54
The Amazing Shenazin
I was skeptical too until I actually read about it and I have to say, it sounds pretty cool

it's true though that not every game needs multiplayer
Jetsetlemming's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 19:06
Jetsetlemming
I associate Digital Extremes with some good multiplayer but I can't at all remember any title they've worked on. Something involving Wolfenstein perhaps?
Also RTCW is the game that started this trend of having multiplayer developed by a separate studio than the normal game.
Naim Master's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 21:05
Naim Master
I thought that was a terrible ideia until "...– Players will step into the shoes of Rapture citizens and learn more about the fall of Rapture as they progress through the experience."I freaking came !
wanderingpixel's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/08/2009 21:40
wanderingpixel
The idea of it sounds good. If they can do it without turning Bioshock into CoD.
otakunoise's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/09/2009 03:24
otakunoise
i'm just now playing through the first bioshock, and i love it for being a single player experience. just like i loved playing "out of this world" for being a single player experience.

sometimes having a seven year old yelling profanities at you constantly ruins the atmosphere. it's like being wasted and meeting a very awesome girl, but you come to realize she's gassy, stupid, and on her period. possibly pregnant, but definitely not yours. it's that bad, and she voted for ron paul. gassy being the least of those offenses.
Ravana's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/09/2009 18:27
Ravana
Hard to say if outsourcing for the multiplayer aspect of a game is a good move or not. Sure, that means more focus on both aspects since you have a second company coming in, but will they stay true to the franchise and not botch it up for what they feel the experience should feel like? I worry as I did for Frank Herbert's son picking up his brain child and running wild with it...and ruined it to add his own flair to his father's work.

I'll keep my finger's crossed.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!