We've been chatting with 2K Marin creative director Jordan Thomas ahead of BioShock 2's release, finding out what's left to find out about the game before it releases this Tuesday. We asked Thomas about the balance between gameplay and story, and what element the studio focused its efforts on.
"We had a very solid mechanical bedrock in the form of the first game," he tells us. "The heavier pressure that I felt we were under was to deliver a compelling new story, so I exhibited a very strong narrative bias as a rookie creative director, sometimes in a way that was frustrating to my colleagues.
"Having taken on the script-writing directly was also a huge demand on my time, which exaggerated that bias further. I was very fortunate to have found Zak McClendon, our Lead Designer, early enough in the project to hand him the reins of the game design. He’s the consummate systems design mind in my opinion, and has done a staggeringly good job in making sure that the game is actually a much deeper, more competitive shooter than what we started with -- shepherding major improvements to AI environment awareness and tactical variety, diversity of player tools, and so on.
"I think humans naturally organize their experiences into narrative form, and are beginning to demand a greater fidelity and thematic subtlety than the industry began with," Thomas continues. "That said, a heavily authored linear story is more of a dev choice. A fascinating player anecdote, generated from almost entirely systemic experience with The Sims, say, is just as valid to me as the dramatic climax of the original BioShock. It’s just a very different approach to meaning.
"BioShock sort of splits the difference, going with a narrative backbone (branching, though, in BioShock 2) supported by lots of localized, emergent vignettes entirely owned by the player."
BioShock 2 launches this Tuesday and our review is scheduled to hit the front page on Monday morning. Make sure you check it out!
Contest:
9:00 AM on 02.07.2010
| 
I wonder if they found a miraculous way to bi-pass that...:D
If there's not gonna be an Andrew Ryan type of plottwist, people are gonna bawwww with "The twist in BioShock was better".
No way to please them I guess, although I'm willing to be surprised :)
I'm calling it.
I felt it was less the game that made it less creepy and moreso the poweryou got halfway through. Fighting off Big Daddy's was scary shit at first but eventually they were just another enemy.
Basically, if there's less filler, and more motivated plot, I'll be pleased.
"1.) will it not feel like an unnecessary continuation of the previous story (even if it's about something stupid, if it's a logical continuation, I'll be happy),"
I don't understand this. I've seen several people on Destructoid say this sort of thing (which gives me reason enough to be cynical) and I can't for the life of me figure out what this even means. Why does a game with plasmids and Big Daddy's and Little Sister's running around need to be logical all of a sudden?
Bioshock is the "spiritual successor" to System Shock, right? System Shock had a sequel. Why is it so out of this world unreal that Bioshock would have a sequel?
"2.) is the game going to be as tense as the first"
I'd assume they're shooting for that.
On the plus side, I put up my first blog post today and it coincides almost perfectly what this article is about (storytelling in games). I hope a few of you will read it and enjoy it.
http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/xandaca/the-world-won-t-change-all-it-does-is-turn-now-let-s-dance--162870.phtml