Quantcast


Bayonetta PS3 cheaper than Bayonetta Xbox 360 photo

This weekend we talked about how the PS3 version of Bayonetta was selling better in Japan, even though it's a slapdash port of the Xbox 360 version. Now we have an even more interesting comparison between the two games for you, this time concerning the North American versions of the game. According to GameStop, the PS3 version will be cheaper than the 360 one.

GameStop lists Bayonetta as $54.99 on the PS3, while the Xbox 360 version costs $59.99. If this price sticks, it could only be a response to fears that the ported version of the game is significantly inferior. This also means that Sega may actually be acknowledging this inferiority as truth. Why else would you not want to charge the same amount of money on both platforms?

Yet another chapter in the PS3 Bayonetta saga.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

47 comments | showing # 1 to 47
prev next

Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:01
Chris Carter
The day that when graphics alone make a game "inferior" is a sad day. The content is 100% the same, correct?
Uzzy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:03
Uzzy
I just want to hand over my cash and see Bayonetta's tits and ass already. Hurry up January!
CapnCrunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:04
CapnCrunk
All things being equal, except one has worse graphics? Yeah, one would be the inferior one. Weird, though, they don't have to discount the PS3 version. The majority of people don't have both consoles so it's not like its really a decision.
Django Reinhardt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:04
Django Reinhardt
Magnalon

If they're 100% the same excepting their graphics, then by definition one is inferior.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:06
Chris Carter
@Carl
If you really value graphics that much. From playing both demos, I noticed nothing that detracted enough from my gameplay experience to make a stink.
BlackwtrMerc's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:06
BlackwtrMerc
I think Magnalon is just saying that it's really not that huge of a difference. Which, as far as I know, is true.
lazyhoboguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:11
lazyhoboguy
I have not played the demo, but wasn't the problem that the ps3 version had bad frame rate problems? That is what would concern me. I would not care if the ps3 version had slightly worse graphics.
Django Reinhardt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:20
Django Reinhardt
I'm just saying that "inferior" is used correctly.

The difference is minimal.
koehler83's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:21
koehler83
Seems like an admission of guilt to me.
acidspunk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:23
acidspunk
@Carl Sagan: Sure it is. Except for the average 20 less frames on the ps3 version at any given time.
AceFlibble's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:24
AceFlibble
As far as I was aware, the problems witht he PS3 version also extended to frame rate issues, which can be a game-breaking (see Warriors Orochi 2)

Even if the difference was just slightly gimped graphics, that can stil be a deal breaker and is a reasonable cause for this price difference.
Let's say you already had both consoles and the game cost the same on both - you'd get the 360 version, because that looks and runs nicer, there would be no reason to get the PS3 version. But now with the price difference, you've got to decide what's worth more to you, prettier visuals or a fiver. Bayonetta is a very visual game so I won't be surprised if the price difference is ignored and the 360 version still sells better in the West.

And if you don't have both consoles then there's nothing to debate.
Django Reinhardt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:28
Django Reinhardt
Well, that's actually pretty substantial.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:32
Jim Sterling
"The day that when graphics alone make a game "inferior" is a sad day. The content is 100% the same, correct?"

If the graphics are worse on one version, then yes, that makes it inferior, especially when the inferiority takes the form of framerate issues and stuttering. Also, the game isn't designed with the PS3 controller in mind. It feels much more awkward on the PS3.
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:35
Shadowiii
Wait, so is alleged pricing on GameStop of all places web site a news story now?
I love your posts Jim but this is really reaching. :P
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:41
Chris Carter
@Jim
I didn't notice the frame rate issues in the demo, but I believe you. That could be an issue late-game when the action gets more hectic.
Tha_Meat's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:50
Tha_Meat
Bayonetta and MW2. Wake me up when something else gets reported on.
Ironknight's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:53
Ironknight
@Jim
Don't spread bullshit that the xbox controller is better its nothing but preference
covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:54
covah


Xbox 360 version on gamestop
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 08:57
Jim Sterling
Tha Meat:

There are fourteen posts on the frontpage that aren't about Bayonetta or MW2. Should I wake you up now or have you had enough hyperbole for the day?

IronKnight:

I never said the controller was better. I said this game was designed for the 360 and not the PS3.
Black Nexus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:01
Black Nexus
I like the idea, if you produce a a sloppy port, slash the price.

That would have made me give more than a few games a second glance.
Tha_Meat's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:04
Tha_Meat
Oh, you wrote something about Alice....guess you can wake me up now.
Sonvar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:15
Sonvar
@ironknight

Jim didn't say the 360 controller was better but that controls felt awkward on the PS3. Which makes some sense since the PS3 version is a port and the game was designed originally for 360.

If I owned both consoles and visuals were slightly better on one console versus the other I'll go with the better graphics as long as the price difference isn't that significant. It would take the game costing $30 on PS3 and the 360 price remaining the same for me to reconsider.
Electrium's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:18
Electrium
@ Covah - Wow, that's really interesting. And strange? But I guess I'm preordering then.
Wheatspin's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:20
Wheatspin
What most people are neglecting to mention is that good graphics mean nothing unless you have a T.V. that can support it. Also how much of a graphics difference could there possibly be? Not gunna get it still, but if I were on the fence, the PS3 version being cheaper would put me off
Trebz's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:20
Trebz
I've yet to understand why Platinum isn't giving both versions the proper care, but the differences aren't huge so I can deal with it.
SASUGA RIVAL's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:27
SASUGA RIVAL
I think I'll just spend the five extra dollars for the 360 version. Best to play a game on the platform it's intended to be played on.
ParaParaKing's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:38
ParaParaKing
Yay. Console wars.
covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:39
covah
Oh hey look, amazon



Yeah... its discounted pretty much everywhere for both PS3 AND 360
AceFlibble's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:46
AceFlibble
@Wheatspin
The TV argument makes sense when you're talking about things like the PS3 properly supporting 1080p and os on, but this isn't one of those issues. Bayonetta has, reportedly, large frame rate issues on the PS3 and the colours and effects overall are more muted. Any screen will show up those differences, especially the frame rate problems.
draycott's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:46
draycott
Bias!!!

5 bucks isn't that much of a deal. Then again I suppose its the principle.

Then again, I'm gonna get dantes inferno before this game.
capitan's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 09:53
capitan
lower price doesn't necessary means its worse. if its cheaper to produce it on a blu-ray you can charge a lower price and still earn more per unit sold. lowering the price also tends to increase the amount of sales. basic economics.
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 10:00
Shadowiii
@xiaolinstyle

It could just be a deal. Is it listed cheaper anywhere else? Not to mention Gamestop is notorious for mislabeling things on their web site.
Also thanks for posting here to just flame and contribute nothing. Keep it up.
Steel Brotha's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 10:08
Steel Brotha
in Canada all Sony 1st party games cost $59.99 CAN. All other games are at a $69.99 standard. Some games, like Tekken 6 are priced at $59.99 Canadian. No doubt that MW2 will be at the $70 standard. It's Platinum games trying to make sell more of the version that was crapped on the most. Don'y hold your breath for the PC version of MW2 being back to $50.
HiddenAHB's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 10:16
HiddenAHB
Quality have a price y'know?
Even if it is something as little as some framerate issues, i will gladly pay a lil more for the game.
otakunoise's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 10:27
otakunoise
i think i read this in the platinum games forums, but i've heard that all ps3 users really need to do is take the resolution down to 720p to eliminate all the framerate problems.
RenegadePanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 11:06
RenegadePanda
@ otakunoise

You do realize one of the PS3's supposed selling points is native 1080p right? Do you see the irony here?
Judo Porkchop's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 11:13
Judo Porkchop
@ covah

Amazon prices just about every PS3 and XBOX game below 59.99 except for MW2 and a select few others. Go figure.
Kyle MacGregor's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 11:17
Kyle MacGregor
You know, many PS2-Gamecube mutliplatform games looked worse on the PS2 and I'm sure that didn't stop those games from selling better or being appreciated more on that platform.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 12:01
Chris Carter
I just walked into Gamestop today to ask about this.

The manager told me it was nationwide, on both platforms.
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 12:17
Qraze
oh well. what can you do? maybe the devs have heard by now developing on the ps3 first then porting to the 360 won't have such fuct up problems.

i been playing orange box on my ps3 and yes, it has a couple framerate issues but does not retract from the experience at all. if that was true then everytime i pause a game to take a piss/shit it would completely ruin the experience. oh no, Lord forbid if i take my attention else where for a minute, the game is ruined! i'll have to restart now to get the full experience! sarcasm.
GamesOgre's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 12:25
GamesOgre
Despite diffferences between video games, I believe price is the biggest influence for the average gamer. I have a feeling that only the rare collector or gamer snob will care about the port issue and be willing to spend the extra $5.

Mark
www.GamesOgre.net
fundando's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 15:43
fundando
Yeah but does the 360 have sixaxis jiggle?
TheGlue29's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 18:15
TheGlue29
Bayonetta cheaper on PS3...yeah that's what I've...wha--wait?? OH you mean cheaper as in "costs less"??

Well yeah...duhhhh, if the game is nearly as inferior on PS3 as it's been made out to be then it should be $10 to $20 less.

Honestly...Devil May Cry sucked, IMO...and this game doesn't really look to do much more than DMC did...well, other than have show some beehive wearing weirdo half naked.

Sorry dude...I'm not a virgin. In fact, up until my decision to enter into a monogamous relationship with the woman who today is my wife, I'd NEVER had a problem pulling hotties down for a night or two.

Not a virgin, not a fan of Devil May Cry = No Bayonetta purchase for me. Not unless it's half price for PS3. Or if it has some good hardcore action. Like...ACTUAL HARDCORE ACTION though.

None of this "hair obscuring" crap. For me, there's porn and there's garbage. If she's just naked, 3/4 naked, 1/2 naked and not doing anything...it's worthless.

I wanna see that broad getting pounded by eighteen in--you get the point.
Los255's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/02/2009 18:23
Los255
LMAO

That is sad.
madman0017's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 01:21
madman0017
It seems alot of people take Jim more seriously than they should whenever he says... anything.

Subtle British humour is lost on you people.
Sithinious's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 07:49
Sithinious
Man, I was all ready to buy this for the PS3 'til I heard of the subpar graphics. Now I'm hoping it'll be released for the PC in full graphical glory (as sight is my primary interaction with videogames, I DO think graphics are all-important).
suicidalblues's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/05/2009 20:29
suicidalblues
Most of Jim's humor just isn't that funny. And he often sounds like a fanboy, just to get a reaction. This whole "it feels better on the 360 controller" thing is soooo stupid, and no doubt just another way for him to get attention.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!