Quantcast


Battlefield Heroes wants more money, angers player base photo

To catch you up to speed, because -- let's face it -- most of you aren't deeply invested in Battlefield Heroes, the free-to-play online game allows players to earn points with which to buy in-game items by either whipping out their wallets, or by simply playing through matches.

Problem is, a new pricing model has been implemented. A very costly one at that. As reported by Ars Technica, it's now significantly more expensive to purchase guns/clothes/whatever by earning your points. Furthermore, all of these items are now cheaper when paid for with real money.

This move has rightfully pissed off a bunch of dedicated Battlefield Heroes players, because now the only way to stand a chance equipment-wise is to spend an ungodly amount of time playing. Or pulling out that credit card. Obviously, for a game of this nature, it throws off the balance. Never a good sign for a multiplayer shooter.

It shall be very interesting to see if (presumably) causing so many regular players to leave for good was worth picking up an extra few bucks here and there from the people willing to put up the cash to stay competitive.

Who knows, maybe the game wasn't profitable enough and there was no "good" alternative.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jordan Devore is Destructoid's PC gaming manager and founding ginger editor. He is said to be easy to love but difficult to know. When Samit inquired about his curious bio photo Jordan simply replied: "bitches love sandcastles" ... yet, there is no sandcastle in that photo. We may never truly understand his ways. Likes Platformers, Pixel-based graphics, Stickerbrush Symphony, Pokemon, Leaderboards Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

31 comments | showing # 1 to 31
prev next

MrSadistic's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 15:43
MrSadistic
Oh Electronic Arts, you little scamp.

-ruffles hair-
mourning orange's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 15:44
mourning orange
OH THE HUMANITY
Insane Enigma's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 15:47
Insane Enigma
Evil laughter GO!!!
CormactheMac87's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 15:48
CormactheMac87
This sounds more like desperation than greed to me. Probably just wasnt profitable. Id be rightly pissed off if I was playing that game, seems like a kick in teeth to dedicated players.
Jordan Devore's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 15:56
Jordan Devore
I'd be willing to believe that it was a choice of either increase the importance of paid items, or shut down the servers for good. If so, it's hard to fault them.
turbbit's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:06
turbbit
Why is it that whenever something is on the internet, everyone expects it to be free? Or do these people also go around cursing Safeway because they raised the price on orange juice?
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:08
Sharpless
Well, you know, guys, this is really not that big of a deal. I mean, EA is a young company, and they really do need the financial support. Don't judge too harshly, as this must be absolutely necessary.
Mr Andy Dixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:12
Mr Andy Dixon
I wonder how Quake Live is doing, financially?
DinnertimeNinja's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:16
DinnertimeNinja
These people should be happy that you can get paid-for equipment using in-game points AT ALL regardless of the time commitment to earn those points.

Most free-to-play games don't give you the option. It's cash money or nothing.
Optimaximal's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:23
Optimaximal
@turbbit - 'Why is it that whenever something is on the internet, everyone expects it to be free?'

Well, in all fairness, when you launch and market a free-to-play online FPS, you tend to expect a free-to-play online FPS.
ChickenNow's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:26
ChickenNow
@mrandydixon: I read some interview with Carmack where he was saying that, profit wise, the game was tanking and they would have to introduce more ads or a subscription based service.
JDigital's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:27
JDigital
@Optimaximal

Eggzackery. I've never played it and really don't plan to, but I do remember the marketing pitch from a little while ago... Free to play, blah blah blah... Can't go changing it now without pissing some people off I guess.
Zanduar's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:30
Zanduar
It was terribly skewed to help paying customers before. I can only imagine how terrible it is now. Why not just play TF2 instead?
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:41
mix
This sounds like some online dollhouse game that is "free" but requires you to buy certain dresses or sheets for your bed.....I'm sure something like this exists.

Don't like it? Don't play it.
tsbaron's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 16:51
tsbaron
I always wanted to play this game, but never could because the damn thing would never install/load on my computer. I just got tired of constant failure at making the game work and chose to play the other battlefield titles. Battlefield 1943 has been one of my best purchases ever.
Turbofail's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 17:01
Turbofail
People play this horse shit game?
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 17:05
Wedge
Lol. There is a player base?
klops's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 17:11
klops
Whats that? Nobody is spending 2 dollars for virtual pants for 1 month for a shitty game? Gwaaah
Magesx's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 17:27
Magesx
If the game was actually fun this would surely be a bigger deal.
gamadaya's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 17:48
gamadaya
My advice (as if anyone asked)? Spend $15 on 1943.

On a side not, how is 1943 350 MB on consoles and up to 10 GB on PC?
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 17:57
StingingVelvet
If you choose to play a free-to-play DLC supported game you should probably pony up for some DLC. Most people I see complaining are acting like trying to get you to pay for DLC is against the free-to-play model, which is exactly the opposite of true.

Anyway, the game offered nothing worth really investing in. Most PC gamers like realistic graphics in the first place and probably think Battlefield 2 is a better looking game that runs on ancient computers and has a massive community already.
matrixdude171's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 18:30
matrixdude171
So much for their "we'll make a good game, and they can pay if they want"
Mobius Einherjar's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 19:08
Mobius Einherjar
@DinnertimeNinja: Problem is, playing by using only in game points is almost impossible: It takes at least 3h30 of playing per day to rent one weapon for ONE DAY. I don't play the game so I don't really know, but read the ars technica article (+1 cookie for Jordan for reading ars by the way) for more information as to why it's impossible to play without paying real money.

@StingingVelvet: "Most PC gamers like realistic graphics in the first place".
Yeah, it's a well known fact that Team Fortress 2 is an absolute failure.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 19:37
StingingVelvet
I blame that on the Valve factor.
CelicaCrazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 19:38
CelicaCrazed
Battlefield: Heroes is not "Battlefield" enough for my tastes. If it was something more like BF1943, I'd be all over it. But as of right now, you get what you pay for.
Brian Szabelski's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 19:42
Brian Szabelski
It's like TF2. Without the free stuff from Valve.
TheStripe's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 20:24
TheStripe
It's not really at all like TF2. Not being able to change classes mid match means they're all so much the same. That steaming EA turf isn't in the same ballpark as TF2
Death by Yeti's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 21:54
Death by Yeti
But this game was never good...
pl0x kthanxbai's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2009 01:03
pl0x kthanxbai
the game was ok, i was in the forums and honestly this move is complete bullshit
pl0x kthanxbai's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2009 01:05
pl0x kthanxbai
450 valor points to buy a gun, FOR 1 DAY!!!!
NoMoneyLeftBoy's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/03/2009 17:40
NoMoneyLeftBoy
This is one game that went right over my head and I'm not exactly hearing any reasons to catch up with it :|
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!