Quantcast


Battlefield: Bad Company 2 and BF: 1943 specs revealed photo

EA DICE just revealed the minimum and recommended hardware specs for its two upcoming PC releases: Battlefield: Bad Company 2 and BF: 1943.

As we imagined, both Frostbite engine-powered games will demand some oomph from fresher gaming rigs. In fact, the studio recommends no less than a Quadcore processor and a GeForce GTX 260.

If that’s a problem, don’t get too blue -- the minimum specs revealed via the official BF blog leads us to believe that a Core 2 Duo can handle the on-field destruction as well. Just don’t expect true awesomeness (or the ladies for that matter) if you plan on rolling with an older PC. Stuff explodes hard in both these games.

Click through the fold for the requirements.

[Thanks, dgschrei!]

Minimum Frostbite PC Specifications for BFBC2 & BF1943
Processor: Core 2 Duo @ 2.0GHz
Main memory: 2GB
Graphics card: GeForce 7800 GT  / ATI X1900
Graphics memory: 256MB
OS: Windows XP
Free HDD space: 15GB for Digital Version, 10GB for Disc Version (BFBC2)
                                 10GB for Digital Version, 4GB for Disc Version (BF1943)

 
Recommended Frostbite PC Specifications for BFBC2 & BF1943
Processor: Quadcore
Main memory: 2GB
Graphics card: GeForce GTX 260
Graphics memory: 512MB
OS: Windows Vista or Windows 7
Free HDD space: 15GB for Digital Version, 10GB for Disc Version (BFBC2)
                                 10GB for Digital Version, 4GB for Disc Version (BF1943)

Don't know what BF: BC 2 is all about? Hit up our written preview from the PS3 beta or this Ten Minute Taste to see the game in action.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

27 comments | showing # 1 to 27
prev next

killatia's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:08
killatia
Loks like I'll have to finally upgrade my processor.
TheDreadHawk's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:10
TheDreadHawk
Is it just me or does that guy look like he's shredding a guitar?
Foamysking's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:27
Foamysking
#$%# #%$%
well it seems a bit bit high but hell my pentinum d need replacing for a long time just hoping core i9 launches before thes games to push don the proc pricing further
N0R3M0RS3's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:28
N0R3M0RS3
Looks like it's time to upgrade my 2 8800GT cards. nVidia needs to hurry the fuck up and release their GF100 board (GT300 series) so I can get an DX11 card.
Scroll's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:30
Scroll
Knew I got a Q660 for some reason.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:33
Sexualchocolate
I don't PC game, wish I could but can't afford to keep a rig up to date. *sadface*

However I am in the BC2 beta on my PS3 and can confirm that it's FUCKING AWESOME.

Have been neglecting it for MAg recently but it's still superb.

Enjoy playing it at super high settings fellas! Sure it's gonna rock so hard on a nice rig.
-PL-'s Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:36
-PL-
I'm sure the newer dual-cores will handle it without breaking a sweat.
KingSigy's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:45
KingSigy
Why does the disc version use less space? Why would DICE/EA make you stream content from a disc? That doesn't make sense.
Gazp's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:52
Gazp
Well, looks like Ill be getting the PS3 version then. Been playing the beta for some time, and Im absolutely loving it.
I guess it shows how awesome this game already is, considering Im liking it so much and that Im not that I never played Battlefield game "for real".

But about the specs, its understandable, given the amount of debris, smoke and bullets flying around every time the action heats up.
Cant wait for March :)
NuDimon's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 09:55
NuDimon
Those reccomended speccs are pretty low. Got 2.5 PC's that should be able to play this game. XD
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 10:47
Kaspar
Are they fucking insane?

Well, gotta get a new processor now...Damnit.
FatherChesz's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:06
FatherChesz
Quad core? Really? If I can find a cheap one, I might grab it, but I have everything else met and exceeded.
Gyrael's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:11
Gyrael
I meet the recommended requirements but holy balls.
Jaysky0's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:12
Jaysky0
So, anyone else think the dying soldier in the picture is playing air guitar?
N0R3M0RS3's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:19
N0R3M0RS3
@Jaysky0:

Yes, he is obviously cranking out a sweet riff.
klops's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:21
klops
FFFFFFFFFuck
gamadaya's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:35
gamadaya
The GPU recommended requirements seem too high, at least for 1943. Why would you need a 200 series card to meet recommended requirements? I've seen the game, and unless it has like 10 times as many effects on the PC than on the 360, there is no reason for a card that powerful. Just because it runs on the same engine as Bad Company 2 doesn't mean it has to have the same requirements (or maybe they really did take all this time to make it look way better).

And what the fucking shit is up with the space requirements? Does anybody else see this? More than twice the amount needed for the DL version of 1943. Why they fuck would they do that. What could possible take up that much extra space. I haven't bought a PC game on a disc in forever, but it looks like I'm going to do it again.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 11:37
StingingVelvet
@ FatherChesz

Quads have been needed to run games really well for a while now really... the consoles are more and more processor focused and we get ports, so we end up needing processors that kick ass.

Specs seem high, especially for a port, but whatever... I meet them. I think it is finally time to get dual-GPUs though, I am just not getting the performance I want from today's games, despite having the best single-GPU card on the market before ATI's new 5000 series. That tells me these games are more and more being designed for dual-cards.

I might be crazy and get a 5970 in January when I come into some cash.
ChronosWing's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 12:20
ChronosWing
meh, last couple ports ran at full blown settings (borderlands, MW2) on my Athlon 64 X2 3000 and 8800GTS, so I don't see this game being much of an issue.
Anastu's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 12:58
Anastu
The guy in the header: SQUIDDLY DIDDLY DOO
Konrad9's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 13:09
Konrad9
10GB for 1943!? Is it going to be more than the teeny tiny 4 maps with a teeny tiny player limit on PS3 and 360?
AlLeBlanc's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 18:10
AlLeBlanc
Cannot wait to see this shit on my pc, will be bloody gorgeous
chronomitch's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 20:07
chronomitch
@gamadaya
More than likely, the retail versions will stream some data off the disc, rather than install it, hence the smaller space requirements. Of course, this cannot be done in the digital download versions, so everything has to be installed on the hard disk.
TewDee's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2009 23:21
TewDee
I have a feeling they really over blew the processor reqs. There is no God damn way Core 2 Duo @ 2.0GHz is the minimum if the recommended is a QUADCORE.
David Pastars's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/07/2009 18:40
David Pastars
Well thank god!!! already have my AMD Phenom ii x4 805 on the way (YAY for me) but i only have a Radeon HD 4850 1 GB and dont know if it will run as good... but here are my current specs until i get my quad core

AMD Athlon ll X2 250 @3.3 GHz
4 GB RAM 2 x 2 DDR2
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 1 GB
500 GB 250 x 250 SATA HARD DRIVE
420 watt PSU Raidmax
Windows 7 Ultimate X64
samsin's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/19/2010 07:52
samsin
I need to upgrade my G.P.U. Will 9800gtx work on 500 watt PSU ?
Aled Owen's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2010 18:54
Aled Owen
Meh compy meets the requirements but I'm upgrading my graphics card to a 9500 GT so it should run pretty smoothly. Don't think my motherboard supports more than 2gb D:
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!