Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.


Battlefield 3 has no in-game browser server on PC photo

It has been revealed that Battlefield 3 is getting an in-game server browser, something that is usually obligatory with PC games. Except ... the feature is exclusive to consoles. The PC version has to use the Battlelog home page, with no in-game browsing allowed.

Senior gameplay designer Alan Kertz has gone so far as to say that there won't be an in-game menu at all on PC, with everything done through a Web browser. He says that it acts as the in-game menu and that you can jump straight from the service into a game with no inconvenience. 

The problem people have with this arrangement is that you won't be able to look for new servers while playing an existing game. You'll have to quit out, go to your browser, pick a new server on the Battlelog page, and re-enter. As you might expect, this is getting a fair bit of criticism from fans. 

While it's not the end of the world, it does seem like an overly complicated, roundabout way of doing things. A simple in-game browser would be so much more convenient. Still, EA hasn't really been about consumer convenience lately, not when there are proprietary services to force down our throats.

Battlefield 3 PC version won’t have in-game server browser [BF3Blog]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

112 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

SephirothX's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:17
SephirothX
Its like EA is just trying to make me not want this game.
ZeroDown's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:18
ZeroDown
Does EA not want my money or something? What did I do wrong?!
sofik88's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:19
sofik88
"Senior gameplay designer Alan Kertz has gone so far as to say that THERE WON'T BE AN IN-GAME MENU at all on PC, with everything done through a Web browser. He says that IT ACTS AS AN IN-GAME MENU and that you can jump straight from the service into a game with no inconvenience."

my mind is blown...
also...
fuck you EA.
TheCheese33's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:20
TheCheese33
That's rather aggravating, but the game itself still looks rather awesome. Looking forward to it.
letsplay789's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:21
letsplay789
Wow ea you just took game of the year for a lot of people and made it shit thanks EActivision
MatthewMk2's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:22
MatthewMk2
I tried this out in the Battlefield Alpha. Everything is done through the Battlelog website. Server browsing, friends, settings, everything. It sucked ass. On the alpha forums there were thousands of posts complaining about it, I'm really surprised EA is sticking with it.
npa189's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:22
npa189
Oh god, it's going to be exactly like BF: heroes, and BF: play4free. Why? I am not going to form a opinion yet, but it seems like they are almost doing the opposite of what everyone wants for this game. The only plus to a browser based menu and server browser is speed.
OneRed's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:25
OneRed
[egregiousantiorigincomment]Brand recognition! EA is hellbent on creating opportunities for gamers to look at that lovely Origin logo over and over and over, until its all they see when they close their eyes. Let no opportunity go to waste![/egregiousantiorigincomment]

The preceding Egregious Anti Origin Comment was brought to you by Kix Brand puffed corn breakfast cereal. Kix! Kid tested, mother approved.
DasPooch's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:25
DasPooch
Wow.... just.. WOW. o.O
Nitex's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:25
Nitex
Umm riiight... PASS!
Dudeydude's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:25
Dudeydude
If only they had a steam interface...
Static Jak's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:26
Static Jak
What the fuck EA?
Common sense should have flung that idea out the window the first time it was brought up.
DasPooch's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:27
DasPooch
I'm having flashbacks to X-Wing Vs. Tie Fighter and other shit on "The Zone"

meteorscrap's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:27
meteorscrap
EA: Because fuck you, we're so good we can inconvenience our customers as much as we damned well please and you'll beg us for more anyway.
DasPooch's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:29
DasPooch
Shit.. that failed. Now it must hang there, in shame.

Anyway, for anyone curious it's the Jan 1st 2002 comic. >.>
Manofiorn's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:29
Manofiorn
Maybe they'll use that freedom they get with origin to patch the game when everybody complains.
SalarymanDaishi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:30
SalarymanDaishi
"EA hasn't really been about consumer convenience lately", "Just ... wow, Konami. Good job!", "Ah, Ubisoft just loves making friends with PC gamers.", "Oh Nintendo, what will you do next, you silly f*cking idiots?" All this within the past week alone ^^; I'm beginning to wonder whether publishers themselves or Jim is the bigger threat to the future of gaming :D
NoJ87's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:31
NoJ87
EA was on their way to being an awesome company for a while there. Everything with BF3 and PC/PC games in general is really changing my opinion of them.
Scuffles's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:32
Scuffles
I could totally buy this if there was no in-game browser in the console versions ..... but to have a convenient in-game browser and then to just not bother with a convince in game browser for the PC .....

Hell the PC pioneered the convenient in-game browser .....
Daxelman's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:32
Daxelman
I used it in the Alpha. It's weird as hell, but it's far from bad.

If they could add the option for both, then it would be real good.
Henriquegds's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:32
Henriquegds
I think EA is doing a bet, how much useless shit put in an awesome game, the winner get MW3
LightandDark's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:32
LightandDark
And how many of you complainers have even used Battlelog?

None of you?

Then shut the fuck up about it. Everybody in the Alpha had no complaints about it, and I'd take their word over someone who hasn't even touched the game yet.

Good god I don't even want to defend EA this much, but it's like browsing the Bioware forums all over again, completely filled with people who don't bother to see how it works out.
God Complex's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:34
God Complex
the game will be great...
to bad you have to climb a mountain of shit to get to it.
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:36
mix
Im sure someone will create their own that anyone can download.

PS3!
DasPooch's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:39
DasPooch
@LightandDark - I don't give a flying fuck how good you think "battlelog" is, it's a fucking web browser. What is this, 1999? Are we going back to Gamespy, The Zone, and hap-hazard shit like that? It doesn't matter how you dress it up, it's retarded and unnecessary, especially when an in-game browser is in the console version. It's more effective, more efficient, and less prone to errors when going from desktop to launching the game via a web app.

Polish a turd all you want, it's still a turd. UMAD?
DasPooch's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:41
DasPooch
er - It's more effective, more efficient, and less prone to errors THAN going from desktop to launching the game via a web app.

Fuck me, I'm off my game today. I'm not even using my phone, I'm on a keyboard...
Eldragon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:46
Eldragon
Simple solution: Don't buy the game. I won't. There are always other games to play.

Course BF3 will still sell million of PC copies from all the people who don't pay attention. Those people will be pissed off, and skip the next Battlefield game. EA will then blame everything but themselves, and kill off the series.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:46
Jon B
Wow, that's absolutely absurdly stupid. And there's pretty much no reason whatsoever for the fact you have to jump through hoops to get into a fucking game.

Looks like I'll be waiting this one out until they fix the amounts of bullshit they seem to be heaping upon a game that previously looked appealing.
Mr Andy Dixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:47
Mr Andy Dixon
Well that's strange.
Freakydemon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:52
Freakydemon
EA stop giving me arguments not to buy this already ! I want that game, all you gotta do is keep me pumped, not simmer down my pumpyness !?
failtuna's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:53
failtuna
That's stupid.
Ace829's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:54
Ace829
EA is making it easier for me to stick to Halo Reach as my main shooter.
qlum's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:57
qlum
I actually prefer it this way having one window with the game maximized (not full screen) like I always have and having the browser on another screen so I can navigated it far more easily than having to go back to some menu ingame it just works a lot better for me having the browser on another screen.

and you dont have to close the game you just have to use alt+tab to switch to the browser which is faster than going back to the server browser via a menu.
Brad Nieder's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 11:58
Brad Nieder
Well, I am glad to see the console version has a server browser. More console games need 'em.
ZeroDown's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:02
ZeroDown
BOYCOTTTTT!!11!!11
RaginDude's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:04
RaginDude
Why is it so hard to make a browser like the one used by Steam? Simple and effective, is there something wrong with that?
Eldragon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:04
Eldragon
Why do this through Battlelog and not Origin? Why should I have two programs running to play a game? I could live with alt-tab if it reliably worked. Far too many games choke when you tab out to rely on it. Having the server lobby built into Origin would be a competitive advantage over Steam. But instead they have a crappy steam knockoff with no advantages.
N-effect-human's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:05
N-effect-human
@Eldragon EA wants those people don't they? The sheep. Isn't that the group who supports them through thick and thin and knows their brands backwards and forwards? No wait, I'm thinking of fans.
RaginDude's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:06
RaginDude
Please please please Dtoid the next someone of your staff meet Dice, ask them why they're so fucking stupid.
flintmech's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:06
flintmech


I have lost count of how many utterly terrible and pointless decisions EA has made with BF3. Four months ago I was really excited for it, and I usually don't get hyped for modern war shooters (I'm sick to death of COD). Now, I couldn't possibly care less about this game.
delta2kbr's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:08
delta2kbr
Ok EA, You win. I'm not buying it. Happy?

So glad there will also be RAGE to satisfy my shooter thirst. You know, that one made by people who are programming GODS and don't shit on us gamers?
njsykora's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:11
njsykora
Facepalm after facepalm after facepalm. Who let the EA monkey start making decisions?
Graham Hall's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:13
Graham Hall
I think EA just hates PC gamers at this point.
killias2's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:14
killias2
Remember when Battlefield was going to be the great hero? This was the game that was going to show COD exactly what's up; that you can do the right things and be successful as a result.

And then all of this.

I might be more angry if I was an FPS-er. As it is, meh, that sucks for you guys.
CaimDark's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:14
CaimDark
Jesus Christ, yet another BF3 news, yet another EA effort to annoy and alienate PC gamers as much as possible. Despite not being a huge fan of FPSs I was seriously considering buying this game, but it looks like EA is trying very hard to make sure I don't. First they don't release the game on Steam, a big no-no for me, then Origin becomes mandatory EVEN FOR RETAIL COPIES, and now this? I can at least understand the intentions behind the first 2 decisions, misguided as they are, but this? Is there a point to this other than making things unnecessarily inconvenient?

And the irony is that, after making all this effort to make playing BF3 on the PC as unappealing as possible, you bet they will blame piracy and "difficult market conditions" if the game fails on PC.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:19
Jon B
@Delta2kbr
Can't wait for Rage. Shit's gonna be awesome.
Additionally, I can't wait to get my grubby hands on the toolkit either. I've already made a load of 3D assets primed and ready to get into idTech5.
pneuma08's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:20
pneuma08
I played the alpha and used the battlelog. It was weird, and definitely confusing that first time when "launching the game" opened up a web browser. They'll probably tweak it a bit before launch, so I hesitate to get into specifics, but I'm largely neutral to the prospect, and once I got used to it it didn't really get in the way at all.

I'm more impressed on the amount of nerd rage coming from this thing. I mean seriously, it's at worst mildly inconvenient. Jim, didn't you just post a video advocating us to reserve our outrage for _important_ things? I don't think this is important.
pneuma08's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:26
pneuma08
Addendum: To be honest, I'm much more interested in _why_ EA and/or DICE chose to build a web browser instead of an in-game browser. Does have more features? Did it save them dev costs that they leveraged elsewhere? Or what?
jfbguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/19/2011 12:29
jfbguy
The funny thing is the way people will remedy this. They'll launch BF3 through Steam as a non-steam game, which will let them Shift+tab the steam interface in game which provides an internet browser. but yeah... Maybe they had it on steam originally which would provide all of the server selection they would need.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!