More and more, I find 3rd person action games to be too generic. I have this feeling of having done the same thing over and over and over....
I will eventually get it on PC, because AA looked awesome and I'm sure AC will blow it away, but I think this is a game I will keep going back to in the living room.
And I would have waited for the PC version, if I had a PC that could run it. Picked it up on Xbox instead.
"More and more, I find 3rd person action games to be too generic. I have this feeling of having done the same thing over and over and over...."
Their called genres and therefore have tropes.
Welcome to videogaming.
i don't think there's any need to generalise here, Arkham Asylum was fantastic on PC and so were the physx effects. it was undeniably the best version of the game, and these days that's not a given.
there is pretty much no chance this will be a "not superb" PC version. sorry if you brought an AMD card but that's not rocksteadys fault. also, there would be physx on AMD cards if they would just eat humble pie and pay nvidia to use it, but no, they didn't like that idea. instead it seems they would rather paint nvidia as the bad guy for not giving it to them for free, at the expense of their customers.
@jimmyx
I guess you, of all people, would know about being irrelevant, huh?
Welcome to videogaming."
I think there are really two elements to my view:
1. There has been a lot of convergence across game genres this generation. Platforming, action, action adventure, FPS, TPS, even RPGs are all playing more and more alike. There are exceptions, obviously, but, in general, I think the trend is undeniable.
2. Even within this set of genres, a particular approach is dominant both in terms of sales and in terms of games produced. What was fun and innovative with early 3d action games has become borderline ubiquitous.
Contrast this with my favorite genre, strategy. Strategy games are still a genre where there are wide differences even between major releases: turn based vs. real-time vs. mixed (like pausable real-time or games that allow either), grand strategy vs. tactics, strategy meta-game (think of Total War) vs. RPG meta-game (FF Tactics and its brood) vs. no meta-game (Civilization). There are even differences in terms of approach to multiplayer and preferred camera angle.
Still, at least part of this is bias, I do admit. I just wonder if its all bias. /end rant
Now, I'm never buying anything on release especially with DRM + online passes.
Can we please ease off more and more -x's popping up?
In any case, I was speaking to other genres becoming more and more alike in general. Most strategy games are still distinct from other genres, which is increasingly untrue elsewhere.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow



























follow











