Quantcast


Atari wants to rub Activision's nose in it with Ghostbusters photo

Anybody who wants to grind Activision's nose in its own crap is a friend of mine, even if it has to be Atari. The new Ghostbusters publisher, by way of Infogrames president Phil Harrison, has expressed a desire to show Activision what it's missed with the spurned Terminal Reality game by making it a success.

Phil Harrison addressed Activision CEO Bobby Kotick's rather disgusting claim that his company is only interested in games that could be "exploited" with yearly sequels and millions of dollars in revenue.

"What Bobby, perhaps unhelpfully said, was that those games were franchises which wouldn’t make $100m of revenue and generate sequels," Harrison explained. "If that’s his benchmark, then fine – and we’d love to aspire to the same benchmarks. But you know what? I would love to turn Ghostbusters into a $100m franchise, just to prove him wrong."

That's a gutsy attitude from Mr. Harrison and one I can get behind. Activision dropped some terrific looking games, simply because it only cares about milking a franchise to death. If those rejected titles can go on to do great things, it would be a slap in the face to Kotick, or rather, a slap to the one place where Kotick has feeling -- his bank balance.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

26 comments | showing # 1 to 26
prev next

Technophile's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:48
Technophile
I hope they do too. I really hope they do.
Cataract's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:49
Cataract
That's incredibly gutsy on Phil's behalf, but I think that it's also the right attitude to have in the gaming industry. I guess that shows that he's really hoping to put some serious polish on the game.
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:49
Sharpless
They will, so long as things don't get royally fucked up along the way.
aaronf's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:50
aaronf
Well Mr. Harrison, I hope my $60.00 for the PS3 version of Ghostbuster helps you achieve that 100m mark. Good luck!
Coldbrand's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:52
Coldbrand
Anyone who's an enemy of Kotick is my friend. I fucking hope that fat fucking ginger gets what he deserves.
Monodi's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:53
Monodi
Durp durp Guitar Hero milking durp durp
ChronosWing's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 17:58
ChronosWing
I want to have rough dirty sex with this game and have its illegitimate children.
Puppy Licks's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 18:07
Puppy Licks
Niiiiice, stick it right up Kotick's ass, Harrison.
RIGHT. UP. THERE.

And tell him GHOSTBUSTERS SENT YA!
Cartman's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 18:10
Cartman
Coldbrand, very mature, attack him on something that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. Well done.
Anywho, the gaming industry could do with more heat. Well played, Mr.Harrison.
TrailerParkJesus's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 18:12
TrailerParkJesus
I really hope that Harrison actually means that they intend to make a quality game, because simply to "turn Ghostbusters into a $100m franchise, just to prove [Kotick] wrong" is not saying much of anything. Devs make million dollar franchises out of mediocre games all the time.
aaronf's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 18:40
aaronf
@TrailerParkJesus:

So true! Just look at Halo.
ShadokatRegn's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 18:43
ShadokatRegn
Oh, they will. I've seen the buzz around Ghostbusters already, and it just gets bigger as the anticipation sets in.
Kyousuke Nanbu's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 19:15
Kyousuke Nanbu
Ghostbusters will sell tons of copies just on the nostalgia alone.

July seems so far :(
Trevor McGee's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 19:24
Trevor McGee
I love Atari for picking Ghostbusters and The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena up. Who the fuck in their right mind would ditch those two? I hated the Riddick movies, but the first game was amazing and it sold really well. Why would they assume this remake/extension wouldn't sell just as well or better? As for Ghostbusters, it's the fucking Ghostbusters! The real Ghostbusters with the original cast, who the hell wouldn't buy that? Activision is full of idiots obviously.
lv99ron's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 19:28
lv99ron
I use to work for both Activision and Vivendi. The dicks at Activision are lucky they have CoD and Tony Hawk to bail them out because most of their games are pieces of shit that they put out based on what the next big movie of the year will be. Vivendi on the other hand was coming into their own, but they made the stupid decision to buy Activision, then give their CEO control over the new company.
SurplusGamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 19:32
SurplusGamer
Look, I don't mean to apologise for Activision or anything, but can we get over the use of the word "exploit" for a minute? It does have more than one meaning as a verb, after all. When I first started working in rights (for TV programmes) I admit it sounded funny to me, too, when people went round talking about exploitation in different territories, but they only mean it of course in the context of the term 'commercial exploits'. It may be a slightly unfortunate word, but it's not the wrong one to use, really.

On the other hand I think it definitely is worth talking about why Activision think that yearly exploitation is the only worthwhile and profitable thing to invest in. I don't buy that at all.
parrothead's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 19:48
parrothead
Who you gonna call?
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 21:19
TheBigFeel
This and Brutal Legend: zero-day purchases.
GuitarAtomik's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 22:22
GuitarAtomik
I'm still trying to think of a good reason why Activision dropped this title. Factoring in the good buzz, recognizable IP, and just straight nostalgia factor, this thing is a can't lose situation. The only question about it is how MUCH money it's going to make.

They went full retard.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 22:26
Jim Sterling
Guitar:

They only want games that they can release yearly for at least ten years, according to Kotick. Since Ghosbusters lacks that kind of mileage, they dropped it.

Essentially, Activision wants to become a sequel factory. That publisher is going to herald a new videogame crash one day, you watch.
masterninja's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/17/2008 23:27
masterninja
I'm buying Ghostbusters!

I think Atari's faith in the game should be rewarded...also cause I think the game is gonna be good...
Aaron Mxy Yost's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/18/2008 03:18
Aaron Mxy Yost
Is there an unwritten rule out there that whenever a game company becomes number one, they have to turn into super douches?
Bealtespip122's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/18/2011 13:39
Bealtespip122
Hell YES. Ghostbusters was awesome. I'd rather have the Ghostbusters game than all Guitar Hero games combined.
knudimrenti16's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/14/2011 17:49
knudimrenti16
vouchsafed it. Outwardly I only thanked man, crying, Thank you, thank cheap adapalene
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!