games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Atari goes on the offensive to protect Alone In The Dark legacy photo

Word on the net has it that a few reviews of Alone In The Dark are based on illegally obtained code for the game, and Atari is none too happy about it. They're so displeased, in fact, that their lawyers went on the offensive -- causing at least one Scandinavian site (as reported by Kotaku) to temporarily pull its lowball score within minutes of its debut on the Internet.

Fast-forward to the present, and German gaming site 4players comes forward with a similar story of being under Atari's glare, and accused of reviewing a (supposedly) illegally obtained copy of the game. In other words, Atari didn't send them a review copy personally, yet they were able to post a review on it. Sound suspicious? Maybe not, as the site claims that they simply walked into a local store and obtained their copy the old-fashioned way -- by purchasing it.

The common theme among all involved seems to be scores that are less than flattering. The million-dollar question remains: Is Atari doing the right thing in their attempt to preempt negative publicity surrounding reviews of unpolished versions of the game, or is something sinister going on here? Atari isn't exactly in the strongest of financial positions, and we're sure they were counting on Alone In The Dark to provide some much-needed relief. As of now, scores for the game are hovering around the 70th percentile, so there's still time to recover. As someone who's been looking forward to playing this game since its inception, I hope those scores are indeed flaky. Who do you believe?

[Via Next-Gen and Kotaku -- Thanks, Jonathan]


Continue: More Xbox 360 stories





prev next

23 comments | showing # 1 to 23

bluexy's Avatar
bluexy at 06/20/2008 17:01
You have to consider that if they really thought their game was great, they wouldn't need to try and get rid of these bad reviews.

Seems to me they want the gaming press to shut the hell up until they can make their profit off of unsuspecting buyers at launch. Chill out Atari, let the game speak for itself!
Brahms's Avatar
Brahms at 06/20/2008 17:58
Bluexy hit the nail on the head. As pretty as those trailers were, I think we're looking at a flawed gem at the very best.
DaedHead8's Avatar
DaedHead8 at 06/20/2008 18:39
Yeah, I blame Atari too. I'll still be looking into this game as I still have high hopes for it.
Dexter345's Avatar
Dexter345 at 06/20/2008 18:49
The scores that have them near 70% (which, by the way, should mean it's above average, right?) are from pretty reputable sources. I'd trust those as much as any other review, but I won't necessarily blame illegal copies for a low score. Perhaps those reviewers just didn't like it?
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 06/20/2008 18:57
I hope it is good, but I'm not naive enough to think Atari don't want to avoid scorn before the game launches.
WhiteX's Avatar
WhiteX at 06/20/2008 18:57
most are 4 out of ten, so, no 70%.

they are trrying to prevent the game from tsnking in the US after bad reviews appear in europe.
ian_esq's Avatar
ian_esq at 06/20/2008 19:03
I knew this game would be shit
Rigor Mortis's Avatar
Rigor Mortis at 06/20/2008 19:06
Reviews are useless as often as not, I'm still interested in the game. Besides, any reviewers who are using illegal copies to scoop the competition are obviously just looking for page hits, which leads me to question the integrity of the review itself.

And in what bizzaro-world should 70% be a terrible sales-killing score? I buy games based on my taste first, and other people's numbers last.
David Boring's Avatar
David Boring at 06/20/2008 19:06
well, there is a prestory. it seems that 4players trashed aitd from very early previews on. i think both sides wre a bit bitchy since then.
anyways i really dont like the way how 4players present themself in this dispute. they stylise themself as the only keeper of the freedom of speech with sentences like "hello? where do we live, in china ? or even iran ?".
fact is, they broke an embargo on online-coverage of the game, by 3 days (the embargo was then lifted for others sites). these embargos are there for a reason and are a common thing in journalism.
big filth's Avatar
big filth at 06/20/2008 19:07
what a shame that this games seems to suck so bad. I was kinda looking forward to it.

I was hoping it would be at least as good as Condemned 2. I guess not?

I will rent it for sure.

cant be as bad as the incredible hulk game.
The Amazing Shenazin's Avatar
The Amazing Shenazin at 06/20/2008 19:34
aw man, don't tell me this game disappoints? :(
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 06/20/2008 19:47
Well, if Professor Pew's review is any indication, "70" is being extremely generous.
Zlimness's Avatar
Zlimness at 06/20/2008 19:58
The game looks like shit. No surprise about the scores.

Too Human looks equally mediocre and will get the same scores. You heard it here first! woooo
foxhound009's Avatar
foxhound009 at 06/20/2008 20:29
I've read those articles (2 of them)
what I see is some really frustrated reviewers about the controlls some say it reminds one controlls from
resident evil 1,2 and 3 as opposed to 4
the 1/3'rd of the article is about bad controlls and glitches.

Since I like the controlls of re 1,2 an 3 :)
and I own reasonably good pc
those above won't mather as much...
I'll just wait for the patch..
and make some macro's on my logitech g15 :)

I think I'll buy it....
the only thing that I care about here
is that it can bring some tension building terryfying experience as you expect from an survival horror game..
I'm hoping for some Alone in the dark :)
foxhound009's Avatar
foxhound009 at 06/20/2008 20:31
Just read the reviews you'll see that the xbox36o controll of this game will make you give this game an low low score :P
hmmm good old pc...

read the reviews!
cybereality's Avatar
cybereality at 06/20/2008 21:03
I think the game looks cool, especially the interactive environments. Even if the game sucks, its probably still gonna be fun setting stuff on fire. That never gets old!
Volomon's Avatar
Volomon at 06/20/2008 21:08
I'm confused I thought it wasn't out yet. I don't see what we can get from really really early reviews either.
Milkman519's Avatar
Milkman519 at 06/20/2008 21:56
Is Alone In the Dark out earlier in Europe because I know in the U.S. it's not released for a couple more days.
Professor Pew's Avatar
Professor Pew at 06/20/2008 22:01
This game is a true abomination of next-gen gaming. Setting stuff on fire does get old and the controls do indeed suck. It sounds like RE if you describe it, but it's really not. If you're gonna try it, please wait a little or rent it first.. It might control better on the PC though, but that doesn't fix a terrible camera (unless it's free in the PC one), TERRIBLE driving and most of all a lack of any suspense or fear.

4Players are idiots for publicly using a pirated copy on their site that has ads and everything. Atari are idiots for trying to contain it in this way, since people will only take a sharper look at reviews and game community feedback than they might have done before. I hear Atari even tried to cover it up by saying that the leaked copy was unfinished code, which is... unlikely.

The game does look cool in the vids and the ideas are nice. Too bad they weren't implemented and the game feels as finished as Halo 9. I can't believe that sites give this a 7 or even an 8.2 in german mags. They really do seem to use a 7-10 scale. More than anything, I really really want to see Rev Anthony's take on this game :)
Catmurderer's Avatar
Catmurderer at 06/20/2008 23:01
Apparentartly Atari ran out of ideas in the middle of the game and ***SPOILERS***













They decided to give the main character psychic powers... ok... but in order to do this you have to >>>grind<<< killing evil trees in order to be able to use the powers. The review I read said this would take an hour or more of straight grinding. So, that kinda kills the game... (probably more flaws but that one seems to be the biggest one I've read)
mistic's Avatar
mistic at 06/21/2008 00:16
Well if they are actually reviewing illegal copies, I think Atari is justified in forcing them to remove it from their site, however, if they actually bought the game, its a whole other deal...

Makes you wonder what Atari would've done if they would've given it a 9/10...
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49651 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: How to respond to a videogame review





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006