Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home PS3 updates

Assassin's Creed sucks on the PlayStation 3: At least that's what they say

7:10 PM on 11.13.2007, Jim Sterling 148 comments

Assassin's Creed sucks on the PlayStation 3: At least that's what they say photo
     PS3

IGN has a review up (warning: possible spoilers) of the highly anticipated Assassin's Creed which is interesting for two things -- its less-than praiseworthy summary (complete with good-yet-humble 7.5 review score) and the fact that it claims the PS3 version is severely nerfed when compared to the Xbox 360 version.

The problems seem mostly to be graphical, which is surely something that the "visually superior" PlayStation 3 doesn't really need. Here's what IGN had to say:

These big open worlds, which are fully interactive, do come at a severe cost on PS3. There is considerable texture pop-in and noticeable framerate issues. Playing back-to-back with the 360 version, it's obvious that Ubisoft did not devote enough resources to the PS3 edition. The framerate is considerably worse, so much so that it begins to affect gameplay in the later levels. You can get through the first two-thirds of Assassin with the framerate being just an annoyance, but it becomes more of an issue for the final third of the missions.

Assassin's Creed started life as a PS3 exclusive, so this is somewhat ironic news to say the least. Ubisoft clearly believes it more worth the company's time to focus on the Xbox 360, which is hardly surprising considering that it's the platform where software is selling best. Still, bad news for those who only have a PS3, and I'm personally a little disappointed by IGN's final verdict on the game. Still, we'll have to wait and see for ourselves whether or not the Creed lives up to its hype.


Next page: More Ubisoft stories




Lord Helmet's Avatar
Lord Helmet at 11/13/2007 19:11
@ timtheterrible:

Either way, as a 360 guy, I can't resist the urge to type "HA-FUCKIN'-HA!"
Fugue's Avatar
Fugue at 11/13/2007 19:16
It's weird, the scores at Metacritic were entirely positive as of yesterday (all three of them) and now they're all over the place.

I think it's going to be one of those games.
Bill_Whiskey's Avatar
Bill_Whiskey at 11/13/2007 19:17
What's up with the reviews for this game? I was excited about the game, but then at E3 it looked kinda so-so. Now the reviews are all over the fucking place. It looks great but i'm not sure about the gameplay as none of the reviews are really any good. And the IGN and Gamespot reviews contradict each other on which system has bad frame rates
BS3 Owner's Avatar
BS3 Owner at 11/13/2007 19:18
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Seriously. EA has gotten into the Board Room!

-----

You know what blows even more now that i hear this.

I ordered Need For Speed Pro Street. Come to find out the PS3 version looks like a light coating of blurred spray paint. Compared to the 360 version. Serious I think EA seems to have done a better yob with it than Ubisoft & Assassins Creed.

I expect this kind of asshatery from EA, but not Ubi.
( Unplayable due to framerate issues in the final 3rd )
UnnDunn's Avatar
UnnDunn at 11/13/2007 19:19
Cue PS3 fanboys' cries of LAZY DEVS!!!!
Aerox's Avatar
Aerox at 11/13/2007 19:19
Things have really been looking grim for the PS3. I wonder if Konami is going to recant their "All 3 consoles will be equally dominant" claim?
Altair78's Avatar
Altair78 at 11/13/2007 19:21
Wow, with the reviews all over the place and things being all contradictory and shit, it's hard to still want this game. It makes you feel like you're taking a chance no matter what system you get it on. I hate when stuff like that happens... just fucks up the gaming world some.
deiga-the-semivaliant's Avatar
deiga-the-semivaliant at 11/13/2007 19:24
According to Gamespot:

"There are few differences between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions. PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate, although the 360 version features a little more contrast in the lighting, so it's pretty much a wash."


WTF? So who do I listen to?
Stonedfox's Avatar
Stonedfox at 11/13/2007 19:25
Ok so I stopped reading Gamespot reviews after they acted all upiddy about Twilight Princess. Now we get an upiddy review about Assassins Creed. The problem is that a good number of these reviewers are morons who frankly are given credibility they don't deserve. It's easy to trash a game when you nitpick every little wet dream of yours that wasn't in it, but thats not what makes someone a good reviewer. Frankly after reading the IGN review, it seems like all he did was bitch and moan about let downs.
vexed alex's Avatar
vexed alex at 11/13/2007 19:31
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust
leshrac55's Avatar
leshrac55 at 11/13/2007 19:31
Yeah, was going to mention the GS review saying almost the exact opposite... but to be honest, while I own both systems my "main" system for multi-platforms is the 360 unless the PS3 can demonstrate a significant advantage over the 360 version. So far that has yet to happen for any game, so I'll take my achievements and online-presence over the decidedly lonely PS3 for now.

-Jeff
http://alinktothefuture.com
timtheterrible's Avatar
timtheterrible at 11/13/2007 19:31
Read this:
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/802/802794p1.html

And compare with this:
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/834/834676p1.html

Which Hilary reviewed this game? It wasn't the giddy school girl from the first preview, but instead sounded more like Hilary was on the rag.
Buddha's Avatar
Buddha at 11/13/2007 19:33
thats just weird at gamesradar they gave it a perfect score and never mentioned frame rate issues at all
and since gamesradar seem to be on the ball with their reviews id rather trust them then her
Stonedfox's Avatar
Stonedfox at 11/13/2007 19:35
Sometimes I think we'd be better off without reviews...
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 11/13/2007 19:35
LOL @ PS3

It's interesting to note, though, that the IGN readers' average rating is 9.2. Of course, people on the internet are asshats, so take that as you will. Still, reviews mean very little. I expect this game to be somewhat repetitive. Always have. I'm not worried, yet.
Eschatos's Avatar
Eschatos at 11/13/2007 19:40
Fuck. I'm not a PS3 fan, but I really wish it'd catch a break, and actually have something awesome happen to it for once.
PixelD's Avatar
PixelD at 11/13/2007 19:41
Being at the last 1/3 of the game I can honestly say that the 360's review of AC is almost spot on. After the first hour and half, I would have rated the game a 10. After 6 hours 7.7 seems about right. Repetative is an understatement.

Has to be the most honest review of them all so far.
leshrac55's Avatar
leshrac55 at 11/13/2007 19:42
timtheterrible:

Hilary's a guy... unless you were just trying to derogatory.

Still, good point about the preview/review discrepancy... I wrote about this topic a long time ago with 1up's preview/review of SSX Blur.
http://alinktothefuture.com/2007/03/01/problems-in-game-journalism-1up-edition/

Looks like you just gave me fodder for a new "IGN edition". Thanks!

-Jeff
http://alinktothefuture.com
Diomeneus's Avatar
Diomeneus at 11/13/2007 19:43
*ahem*

woohoo? Sorry sony but I always wanted assassins creed for myself anyways.
Hiltz's Avatar
Hiltz at 11/13/2007 19:44
Oh God. It's like Lair and Heavenly Sword mixed reviews all over again except those were exclusive titles. Other high-profile games like Kane & Lynche appear to be getting some low reviews scores as well.
timtheterrible's Avatar
timtheterrible at 11/13/2007 19:44
Yeah, I know he's a guy, I was just being a dick.
DizzleLeep's Avatar
DizzleLeep at 11/13/2007 19:46
The game sucks, its honestly not worth anyone's time. Also why not mention the Gamespot review where they say it has better frame rate? I just don't understand this site, I'd rather have an review from here. If I wanted to read IGN I'd go there.
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Johnny Blaze at 11/13/2007 19:46
Hey is there any website that have a comparsion shot of the game?
raucci's Avatar
raucci at 11/13/2007 19:47
This was a definite buy a week ago, and still is, but so many last minute things have popped up, telling us that the game really isn't all its been hyped up to be.

Oh well, I got 360, so I hope the framerate is fine on that, it looks to be an enjoyable game regardless of what the reviewers say, I think we can all agree to some extent.
Cheeburga's Avatar
Cheeburga at 11/13/2007 19:47
Sucks for you guys.
Bill_Whiskey's Avatar
Bill_Whiskey at 11/13/2007 19:49
I'm actually kind of thankful for the mixed reviews. I'm been on as impulse binge lately. Since August I've spent $420 on games. If the scores were great all around for AC, I'd bee picking it up tomorrow too.
raucci's Avatar
raucci at 11/13/2007 19:49
Or... apparently we can't agree...
Hiltz's Avatar
Hiltz at 11/13/2007 19:52
Here's a scary thought.


What if Rayman Raving Rabbids 2 turns out to be Ubisoft's best title this year? I mean after the disappointing situation with Assassin's Creed it makes you wonder how Haze will turn out even though Ubisoft is just the publisher.
Scape's Avatar
Scape at 11/13/2007 19:53
Everyone is saying different things at this point, so I am just going to wait to see how things turn out.
Magesx's Avatar
Magesx at 11/13/2007 19:56
I like how 360 "lol ps3 n00bs" are more concered about this that PS3 owners. Aka, me. Shit, who cares if the graphics aren't as good? It's not like the game isn't exactly the same.
Magesx's Avatar
Magesx at 11/13/2007 19:58
than, even.

BOY I LOVE SPELLING.
monroy16's Avatar
monroy16 at 11/13/2007 19:59
it really gets to me when i hear stuff like this because it's not like the ps3 can't handle it. it's always them thinking "oh the ps3 isn't seling our software, cut the team down and put them on the 360" no wounder they aren't selling their stuff with software that is faulty.
monroy16's Avatar
monroy16 at 11/13/2007 20:00
too bad this game looked good enough for me to buy but guess not
Sharpless's Avatar
Sharpless at 11/13/2007 20:01
@Magesx
And yet, if the PS3 version were graphically superior to the 360 version, you know damn well that the PS3 fanboys would be gloating about it. Let's be honest, here.
Cokeman170's Avatar
Cokeman170 at 11/13/2007 20:07
Im positive they will both be amazing and worth buying on either system. But from what has been gathered, if you have the option between one or the other, get the 360 version. The average of the reviews is leaning towards it.
Lord Raoh's Avatar
Lord Raoh at 11/13/2007 20:12
interesting, since gamespot said the ps3 had better framerate but 360 had better lighting


____


There are few differences between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions. PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate, although the 360 version features a little more contrast in the lighting,


http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/assassinscreed/review.html?sid=6182795&page=2
Namelessted's Avatar
Namelessted at 11/13/2007 20:12
the Cell CPU can only go so far. It is a shame that the PS3 is bottlenecked by its disc read speed and available memory. The Cell can do a lot of crazy stuff, but it is useless in the PS3 with all its other limitations.

As for the game itself, i might rent it, i dunno
Stonedfox's Avatar
Stonedfox at 11/13/2007 20:18
I think this game needs to be bought if only to support a better sequel. Regardless of how the game actually is, not even IGN denies what the basic groundwork has laid out for the future of this series.
Magesx's Avatar
Magesx at 11/13/2007 20:19
Oh yeah, Sharpy, I know damn sure that PS3 fanboys would do the same thing. However, it's this way around, and you'll be damned sure I'm whining about rub-inners.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 11/13/2007 20:27
Hilary Goldstein that David Spade sounding mofo! He's reviewing games based on his arrogant and spoiled POV when it comes to playing games, not from the consumers POV. Who are more appreciative when it comes to the games they buy and own. We don't get free games through the mail and play dozens of different games per week. For shame Hilary.
Tallgeese3w's Avatar
Tallgeese3w at 11/13/2007 20:29
I have played cod4 for both 360 and ps3 (thank you bbuster) and there is no visual difference at all, textures, framerate, character detail, and i have a 55 inch 1080p sxrd tv, for BOTH systems which i love, and i have finally seen a ps3 game equal in all re3spects to the 360 version, cept for achievements i need me my gs score, anywho, what the fuck ubisoft, and what the everliving fuck is up[ with game reviews lately, they suck balls, but dont listen to me, i liked lair. alot.....sorry?
Boolean's Avatar
Boolean at 11/13/2007 20:31
FUCK, I was really hoping this game would scrape in with a 9.0. Sounds like they really screwed a lot of the game up
IvoryShipping's Avatar
IvoryShipping at 11/13/2007 20:32
That figures. Just as the PS3 seems to be gaining steam we get crapped on from Ubisoft. I wonder how many other developers are thinking the same way. It's a shame, PS3 will most likely have a longer life than 360 as it has a lot of untapped potential in the Cell Processor and the myriad of other features. Mindsets should change.
Magesx's Avatar
Magesx at 11/13/2007 20:36
However, IGN is only one review source. GamesRadar (<3) have it a 10, GS gave it a 9, etc, etc.

One bad review means nothing.
Magesx's Avatar
Magesx at 11/13/2007 20:37
Or 2 or 3 or 4 bad reviews.
decoyb's Avatar
decoyb at 11/13/2007 20:37
Ah yes, another flamebait headline. The correct version should read "Assassins Creed sucks". I'm saving my money for uncharted and mass effect (as long as my fears of super mannequin space battle are unfounded) anyway.

I guess the developers were too busy hitting on Jade to fix the game.
Farktoid's Avatar
Farktoid at 11/13/2007 20:48
See, this is why there was a media blackout on the game's reviews until the day it came out. Ubisoft knew they had a decent game, but not one that would blow everything out of the water. I'm glad I waited and didn't buy it today. I plan on renting it once Blockbuster gets it in.

No big deal, it's just a week until Mass Effect. I can Rule 34 that blue alien chick until it comes out.
prev next 50 comments

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39719 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

The best and worst '4th' videogames EVER!











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006