No surprise here.
To answer your question, no, I'm not surprised
Wait, the game isn't even out yet. Doesn't anyone else find this revolting.
I wish DLC was never invented as the number of companies that abuse it vastly outweigh those who release decent content.
Wouldn't it be fucking great if a developer said "we thought of doing this for DLC since we didn't have the resources at the time, but thought, what the hell, let's put it in the retail release".
Besides the obvious Katarmari shitstorm, The Maw just sickened me. It was like a 2 hour game that had planned, finished episodic content.
It's pretty much obvious it's set in Dec. 2012 as templar's will release a brainwashing beam thingy with the piece of eden and other artifacts and since the first game was set in Sep. 2012.
I thought that as well, I'm pretty sure AC was always going to be a trilogy. I'd also like to second that Victorian London would be insanely awesome.
And obviously it's going to happen. The first game sold like crazy (and, like Far Cry 2, was only really as repetitive as you made it by your decisions), the sequel is riding a massive hype train already, and the concept itself has tons of possibilities. I'd frankly be surprised if the series stopped at 3.
After AC1's disappointment, I'll be waiting for reviews on AC2 and if I wait long enough to find out that the DLC adds hours of gameplay and important story elements, then reviews need to tell me that the game is worth $80 (or whatever the price may be) instead of the usual $60. They're more likely to lose a sale than not.
Assassin's Creed Revelations images; Assains | Assains Creed | Assassins creed revelations | Assassins creed revelations | Assassins creed revelations indir | Assassins creed revelations indir | Assassins creed çıkış tarihi | Assassins creed brotherhood
Mike..
Good days.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow















follow