games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Ask The Weekly Geek: a new feature for your enjoyment photo

Greetings! I am Chris Furniss from The Weekly Geek podcast, here to bring you a brand new feature aptly named: "Ask The Weekly Geek". Why should you ask me anything, let alone believe anything I say? Because I am known to have an encyclopedic knowledge of things Geek, and it is clogging up my brain tubes. I must eject some of this knowledge or else my head will explode. Help my head not explode!

I like to rant. I am passionate about things, either rabidly for or rabidly against said things. I take video games way too seriously, just like you, dear reader. And with that, let us begin!

QUESTION: "Why does Nintendo insist on ignoring the hardcore gamer base and marketing to my grandma?"

Ah, yes. You are obviously referring to Nintendo's new marketing strategy where they release a metric ass-ton of games that make you waggle your arms in order to have fun. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not a Wii hater, nor am I a Wii fanboy. For the record, I love Nintendo, and always have; I even sport a Triforce tattoo on my wrist. That said, the Triforce on my wrist burned like hellfire when I was forced to swing my Wii remote around to make Link's sword slash in Twilight Princess, but I digress. First, let's get a little context.

First rule of business: Make money.

This is why businesses exist. They aren't around for the betterment of mankind, for the elevation of society, or for the protection of the Earth - that's the realm of charities and private organizations full of crazy people (see: Greenpeace,). No, businesses are in the business of business, and the video game business is quite the lucrative one indeed. Nintendo knows this firsthand: back in the 80's they dominated during a time when all that was being released were clones of other successful games. Everyone had their Centipede, their Pong, their Missile Command, until a sparkling young artist named Miyamoto came to town and was set to task at making use of a bunch of old arcade cabinets for a game that didn't sell called Radar Scope. Because seriously. Would you play a game called Radar Scope? He came up with Donkey Kong, which was so innovative and crazy addictive that arcades began to take issue with the cabinet's coin case filling up all the time. You couldn't play it when you wandered in to your favorite arcade because everyone had already played it to death. Nintendo saved the games industry then, and ushered in an age of home console gaming a few years later with the NES. This is where we come in.

By "we", I mean the hardcore gamer demographic. The guys who used to stay up all night playing through Milon's Secret Castle because it was there. The guys who would wake up three hours before the school bus came to conquer Contra without the code. We are between the ages of 18-35, typically male, and ridiculously white. We know every bit of minutiae regarding the games industry, and can tell you things like the Japanese name for Goomba (kuribo!). And perhaps most importantly, we have a lot of disposable income, and take our video games very seriously.

The trouble is that we're a static group. Hardcore gamers are an exclusive clique with an entire industry built around their specific needs. We buy a ton of games and are going to continue to buy a ton of games into our old age, but as we approach that elderly threshold, the average age of gamers keeps going up. We aren't attracting anyone older or younger to our demographic. If this keeps up, we're likely to start seeing strange titles in the future surrounding the adventures of 70 year old men all of a sudden realizing they have superpowers along side Madden 2050: The Maddening.

Simply put, there's no growth in the hardcore gamer demographic.

What happens when the hardcore gamers start dying off? Nintendo is used to thinking long term; they've been around for over a hundred years, and got their start making playing cards called Hanafuda. They've only recently got into video games. How lucrative can a market be when in 40 years your target demographic is worm food? Enter the blue ocean strategy, which has Nintendo throwing a Wii remote-shaped life preserver out to non-gamers. Brain Age, Nintendogs and the Wii have all proven that you can get people who had no intention or desire to play video games in the past to spend their money on Nintendo's products.

The question is: will this new demographic that Nintendo is trying to win over transition into the hardcore? Will you see soccer moms playing Metroid Prime? Not likely. Rather than simply ushering non-gamers into the gamer fold, Nintendo is creating an all-new market. They are turning their focus on to this brand new group which, by sheer virtue of its numbers, has much more money than we hardcore gamers ever had. This is horrible for us! This is not a good thing at all! As their focus moves more and more towards constructing hats made out of money, the hardcore games are going to be left in the dust. Funds are no longer going to be spent making some brilliant new 40+ hour RPG where you fight monsters made out of poop (see: Blue Dragon), it's going to go to the development house who is making the next compilation of Super Partysaurus Fun Time Land, because it sells. You and I may think that waggling your arm and pretending it's a sword doesn't feel like the real deal, but people with no experience using a d-pad are going to think it's immersive and amazing.

Sure, this may be a jaded point of view, but look at Nintendo's E3 conference this year. There was a magical moment there when Bill Trinen announced that Miyamoto was coming out to present a brand new IP no one had ever seen before. Nick Brutal was sitting next to me, and I was so excited I think I peed his pants. Was it going to be a brand new and exciting series like Pikmin was? Was it going to be a new Zelda? We started clapping excitedly like a couple of little girls at a Hannah Montana show. Miyamoto walked on to the stage, and my chest swelled a bit -- this was the man who brought so much happiness to my life through his creative vision. What sort of new magic would he wow us with today?

Oh. It was a standing simulator. WiiFit.

My heart sunk. Miyamoto no longer cared about me. He was marketing to someone else now, someone with completely different gaming tastes. Someone who likes to stand and get said standing evaluated on their TV screen. I felt forsaken by the man who helped hone my gaming tastes to begin with.

What does the future hold for Nintendo? What can you do as a gamer to cope with this horrible waggle-based brave new world? Pretty much nothing. You can learn to enjoy Nintendo's new "casual" gaming attitude, or you can look elsewhere for your gaming fun. Nintendo has changed, and they've left you in the dust. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go weep for a couple hundred hours. Thanks for depressing me with your question, jerk.

Have a question for The Weekly Geek? Post it in the comments for next week's column!

Continue: More wii stories





prev 50 comments
next

60 comments | showing # 51 to 60

Dyson's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 04:34
Dyson
I didn't bother to read any of the comments above me, because I don't care about them. All I care about is the fact that I'm reading Chris Mothafuckin' Furniss on my goddamn Dtoid!!!!!!!

It's not that I don't love you all, it's just that I man-love Chris even more.
nilcam's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 06:15
nilcam
@Jim Sterling

I mostly agree with your post - consumers have the ultimate say over corporations and vote with our purchases. It's also extremely lame how badly Europe is fucked over by NOE. I disagree with you on the VC, though. I really enjoy having the chance to play classic games that I no longer own or are impossible to find. I'm salivating over the NeoGeo coming to the VC because I've never been able to own that console.

Then again, I'm so retro it hurts.
GuitarAtomik's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 07:23
GuitarAtomik
@Lukich

I'm not blaming them for making those games. I'm just saying it's a weak argument to site those games as proof that they haven't forgotten the hardcore market. All of those IPs are tried and true and no matter how good or bad they are, they will make them boat loads of money. Nintendo knows this. There is nothing wrong with this at all.

BUT if they really were thinking about the "hardcore" gamer they'd be developing NEW untested IPs for that market along side the ones that are guaranteed money in the bank. But the only examples of them doing that (Project Hammer, Disaster) have been shoved to the side for the moment so they can "shift focus" ie make games for the casual market.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 08:04
Jim Sterling
Chris Taran: I don't think Legend of Zelda on the NES is worth more than 25p without anything extra to show for itself. That's my problem with it.

Entertained much, Smuggles?
iNerd's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 08:16
iNerd
Your wrist hurt? How hard were you waving the remote anyway?
Lukich's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 09:27
Lukich
@GuitarAtomik

Oh believe me, I'm all for the new, untested, creative titles. I just don't believe that calling Nintendo out for spending a lot of time on the true "Nintendo" titles is appropriate. I for one would feel a little irritated if my Metroid or Smash Bros was put on hold for something that may or may not be just as fun.

I'm honestly not all that worried about the fact that we haven't seen a lot in the way of "hardcore" titles yet. You have to think, the Wii is well on its way to becoming the next-gen console with the largest user base. Everyone knows this, and everyone is going to want a piece of the action. There may be a period where mini-games rule the market b/c they're cheap and easy, and at this point will probably sell enough to make good profit. Eventually though, people are going to start realizing the potential of the media, that it can be so much more than mindless entertainment. I think right now, a lot of the Wii user base is just ignorant to how sophisticated the media can truly be. It won't last forever though. Have faith in that :D
Chris Taran's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 10:44
Chris Taran
@Jim Sterling

Well, admittedly not nearly as entertaining an answer as I thought I was going to get.

I've no problem with what you precieve something to be of value to you. If you don't think Zelda is worth the cost, then I'm glad you didn't buy it. And I'm not being facetious.

However the only problem I had with your statement is that others aren't allowed to find the prices reasonable. And that you seem to be berating anyone who doesn't mind purchasing The Legend of Zelda for $5 (or 25p in your case).

I for one think that's a perfect price, as I no long have a working NES and my father has long since sold off my original cartridge. It would cost me more than $5 to find and purchase a working NES and a copy of the cartridge.
Lukich's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 10:57
Lukich
Dude, Chris, you have no idea how excited I was at the oppurtunity to pay $8 for Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past. Yeah, I had downloaded it for emulators numerous times before, it just doesn't have the same feel as holding that sweet, sweet console controller in your hand. Nostalgia kicks in big time and all of a sudden I'm 8 again. Fantastic :D
Grover G Grover's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2007 20:21
Grover G Grover
@Furn Gully
"My theory is just that we are going to get more of the same. A great game every 3 months or so, while the rest of the time is filled with new ways to train your brain, or fantastically clever peripherals that tell your body mass index."

You say this like it's bad. Only a great game every 3 months? WE'RE DOOMED

"except for Grover G Grover. That guy's a jerk."
<3
prev 50 comments next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Assassin's Creed 2 review
    Crossfire Remote Pistol review
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    more reviews
    Driver
    Avatar
    GT Racing Motor Academy
    Bad Company 2 beta dishes out meaningful experiences
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 50962 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jonathan Holmes: Why No More Heroes HD could mean a Wii total victory





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006