The first Army of Two was terrible. I cringed when I heard they were making another.

too much?

Unimpressive.... There where no fist bumps.

@Lydeck: I see your opinion and would like to respectfully disagree. The first Ao2 was some of the most fun my roommate and I have had in a co-op game in a long time! Sure it wasn't the Citizen Kane of videogames(tm) but it was 6-10 hours of mindless fun.

Can't wait for the next one.

Ladies lift up your shirts

Can their bromance survive the high seas of video game morality?

I can't get where this game is falling half the time. Does it acknowledge it's bromance ridiculousness and embrace it by not taking itself seriously or does it do the whole typical "Save the world, we're badasses," schtick?

@Xzyliac: The first game fell in to your latter description. Assume the same of the second.

The demo was alright. I shot the dude when it gave me the option whether to or not and my friend was like "OMGWTF?!?!?111?" and I just responded "I guarantee you the reason why they gave us that option is because he will die regardless we let him live or not. He'll get killed by the enemy later on." What do you know? He actually does if you let him live. I know that was off topic but that seems to be the only part I like about the sequel. The customization? Umm ok? A mask is a mask. And you can rarely see the guns while your shooting at your enemies.

I disliked the first one. This one hasn't changed much except getting a slight graphic boost, customization, and choice. I just don't like the game I don't know. I think the whole franchise and story could have been better.

Plus I just hate that EA message saying you HAVE TO make an account in order to play ONLINE.

Wow...