Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

Apple and Google pass on new ESRB mobile game ratings photo

The ESRB and CTIA got together to create a ratings system for mobile games, but the two biggest in the business do not plan to participate. 

We told you earlier this week that providers like AT&T, Microsoft, Sprint, T-Mobile USA, U.S. Cellular and Verizon Wireless are on board with this new mobile videogame rating system, which will use the same letter system used now used on retail games. Too bad Apple and Google are staying out of it completely. I'm sure no one is surprised. Well, maybe the ESRB folks are.

Apple already has half a million apps in place. Why change now?

As for Android, they already have a system in place. A spokesman for Google told Digital Trends, "We’ve put a lot of effort into Android Market’s rating system, which now works well globally. While we support other systems, we think it’s best for Android users and developers to stick with Android’s existing ratings."

This can't be good for the adoption of ESRB's new ratings system.

 








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Dale North is Destructoid's Editor-In-Chief, a founding editor, and specialist in Japanese gaming. An accomplished musician, Dale was reporting from Japan during the earthquakes of 2011. Luckily, he got the fuck out alive and is home in America now with his wife and beloved corgi, Einstein. Dale is also a co-founder of Destructoid's sister anime site Japanator. Likes Corgis, Sega Saturn, PSP, iPhone, Photographic tools. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

13 comments | showing # 1 to 13
prev next

Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:04
Chris Carter
Told ya!

Apple does not want the greedy ESRB dipping it's cheeto fingers into their pot.

The ponzi part of this scheme is that the ESRB doesn't even have to rate the games anymore! The developers rate them and the ESRB gets royalties! Why would Apple and Google hand them money when the current system works? Maybe the ESRB will whine to congress asking for a handout.
supergauntlet's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:06
supergauntlet
Never cared for the ESRB.

This is a step in the right direction. :)
wqerty's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:19
wqerty
fuck ESRB
Ronin4life's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:20
Ronin4life
We don't need the esrb to tell us who should play angry birds.
It is obviously AO.
Also, the esrb would be better if it were run by Higgins from Magnum P.I..
Rockefellow's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:21
Rockefellow
PWNED
I'm assuming this might have to do with fees that the ESRB charges to rate games, right? Even if they don't charge nearly as much for cheap downloadable ones, I'm sure the fact that they don't even really rate them themselves anymore is also influential in this.

I mean, besides being late to the party... dumbasses.
Speeeven's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:21
Speeeven
Makes sense to me. What would Apple and Google gain from getting ESRB ratings on games? It would cause more harm than good. For starters, the ratings process will delay games before their initial release. Also, the ESRB would probably require Apple and Google to re-submit games for ratings every time there's a new update, since app updates vary from bug fixes to total content overhauls.

The ESRB is dumb and their archaic ratings system simply won't work on these platforms.
BoomingEchoes's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:40
BoomingEchoes
I don't really think its going to matter to the ESRB. I mean it might matter because they put the time into it, but its a suggested system, its not manadory. Its not like it can really fall back on them if something goes wrong with Apple and Google because hey, they tried to offer it and they didn't bite.

Apple and Google have systems in place and they're fully prepared to take the brunt of it if something isn't rated to a customers standards. Personally I think it would be a show of good faith to have BOTH systems in place, but meh, its not going to matter, no one can really complain that things aren't rated at all.
MuddBstrd's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 18:50
MuddBstrd
If the ESRB is even remotely surprised at Apple's response, they're just ignorant. It will be a cold day in hell before Apple lets anyone do anything in their carefully manicured garden.

However, surprise at Google's decision is more warranted. Since the ESRB is (I would hope, but who knows with parents these days) a well-known rater of games and their system is known, Google could use an adoption of their system as a leg-up on Apple, letting parents know that their market place is rated by a trusted third-party entity.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 19:43
Chris Carter
@mudd
Or Google can do it for free and pocket the proceeds. Like they're planning on doing.
The Random One's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 20:06
The Random One
Ha, as if Apple would allow a rating system that doesn't let them remove anything that looks funny at them.
Usedtabe's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 20:08
Usedtabe
Good. Fuck the police.
TheGoldenMonkey's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/01/2011 20:35
TheGoldenMonkey
Google I'm not surprised about, but Apple? Either way, good for them. And, yes. Fuck the police.
Davedude's Avatar - Comment posted on 12/02/2011 00:05
Davedude
while at first I felt the need to defend the ESRB, you guys bring up really good points especially pertaining to how frequent content updates are. These mobile games don't work the same as handhelds from sony and nintendo. Handhelds sell complete games, while mobiles will provide so many updates, it'd probably be unfeasible to reevaluate the game every time it updates. Also, the royalties argument, the further delay in game release (which to me isn't much of a point, but to delay updates would be a problem), and various others... they all lead to this making sense.

The only thing I think is a problem is that without the ratings board, we're not as likely to see "M" equivalent games on the iOS (and perhaps the others, I don't know about their app history) because Apple has large control over what gets greenlit for the app store. I don't recall seeing many terribly bloody games on it really, and Apple has been known to pull things down from it's store that it doesn't like. The ESRB system would promote the creation of rated M games on mobile devices.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!