I just don't like the precedent that Angry Birds (and the people that buy it) is setting for these kind of simple enjoy-&-forget games, the same way I don't like games that are only about farming or collecting items.
I understand it as a mobile game, but I'm still kind of shocked people want it play it on their PS3s.
It's like the companies that develop web browsers bragging about how many downloads they've had when most of them have been automatic.
Also everything Gwendolyn said.
I mad
Yup, the equivalent of nearly the entire population of the United States has downloaded that game.
Also, what llort het said.
games like Cut The Rope are much better.
Hating it would give it more credit than I think it is due, at best it leaves me perplexed. It really doesn't seem to be a substantial game but whatever, I wish it the best.
Your problem is with the "enjoy and forget" aspect? So are you telling me Tetris is different, or Pac-Man? Hell, what about Bejeweled and all the Popcap games?
All this hate is manufactured bullshit from people. Gamers are too damn cynical and self-entitled. Jesus christ, the company is quite indie in its founding, just three college kids and we STILL cant be happy for them? Haters gonna hate. Rock on Rovio.
Agreed. There is no reason to "hate" Angry Birds. Hating a video game is no more stupid. I bought it (paid a whole buck!), played it, enjoyed it, beat it, moved on. It's nothing that changed my life.. but for a time waster on my phone it fit the bill perfectly.
And as far as cynical and self-entitled, you couldn't be any more accurate. I noticed Destructoid readers are particularly awful about that.
@ Drakengard,
"What Gwendolyn said. Nothing else really needs to be said about this."
Except.. the part where she should have made some sense.. because nothing there made any of it. Seriously, "play and forget".. what does that even mean? Why can't any game be called that? Why is that even a bad thing?
"Hating a video game is no more stupid"
Haha, wtf. I meant "Hating a video game is incredibly stupid" or something along those lines. Oh well, whatever.
Like I Said it happens all the time...everything "Indie" or "Different" from what's popular is always going to be considered "better" while things that gain too much popularity will be called "overrated"
I thought I'd let you know that this is my first comment on destructoid. I made this account just so I could tell you that you've mimicked my opinion of Angry Birds down to the letter. Very well said!
They made something big, that is awesome, but calling 4 reskins and ports separate games is bullshit. By that logic pop cap has made at least 6 "entries"in the plants vs zombie series alone.
I'm old school. I've been playing since the Atari 2600 was bleeding edge, hell, I was throwing my allowance away a quarter at a time when Joust and Pac-Man ruled the earth. I'm dedicated enough to remember booting up Ultima 7 on a 386 PC and loving every minute of it, or to have played Nintendo Hard games back in the day during all nighters with friends.
You cocky blowhards can bleat all you want, but the truth is Angry Birds does what a lot of $60 games like Duke Nukem Forever or Fable 3 can't; it offers a good time. Tetris did it, and the brilliant yet underrated Wario Ware Inc did it too. Uncomplicated, unconvoluted, inexpensive fun. Have a problem with video games being fun? That's your problem. I'll be the one enjoying a nice game of Angry Birds while I wait for my meal at a restaurant, or in the lobby at my doctor's office, or hell, while I wait for my fancier games like Just Cause 2 or Dragon Age to load up.
Jim, if anything makes me sad, it is simply that the propagandistic bullshit the industry has been flinging at us is being echoed by the industry's journalists now (sarcastically or not). I only wish people would see this for what it is rather than taking what's being fed to them like good little sheep and crying about how a few games on a person's phone is doing more harm than Dragon Age 2, Brink, or Duke Nukem Forever.
As I said, I just don't like the precedent these kind of games are making, just like I don't like the precedent a lot of Hollywood movies make by giving us mainly eye-candy and explosions. Those numbers are telling the companies that our quality bar is super low and they don't need to put much effort into their product, so why bother crafting something elaborate?
I'm not a big gamer or anything, but even I can understand that usually you get as much quality as effort you put into any project.
<a href="http://www.healthinsuranceweb.com/states/michigan-health-insurance/">michigan health insurance</a>
If a publisher is struggling with a quality title, then they really need to assess their marketing and price points, as this is more a case of poor business than it is of market competition.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow


























follow










