I don't mean to troll or defend Angry Birds when I say this, but BF3 is just a game where you move a target reticle over someone and press a button and they die; MVC3 is just a game where you mash buttons to drain your opponent's life bar faster than he can do to you; Final Fantasy is a series where you select a words from a series of menus and your opponents die; Super Mario Bros. 3 is just a game where you hold right on the D-pad and then hit a button to jump over obstacles in your way... Any game can be described in a manner that makes it sound like some undeserving time-waster.
Angry Birds is mega-popular. Rovio took the right idea, went to the right place at the right time, and asked the right price. And lo and behold, it was a runaway success. Can we just accept that and move on with our lives?
Considering I can get games like League of Legends, Team Fortress 2, and just recently DC Universe Online for free, the fact that Rovio is charging .99 for something that I did half assed in college kind of rubs me the wrong way. Then again, Rovio's probably too busy swimming in money to give a crap what I think.
Still kinda depressing that this slight phenomenon is based on what is little more than a slingshot game though...
So highly likely it ain't 500 million unique downloads.
plus with the first one being free now, cant see anyone not having it
Maybe.
I mean think about all the articles jim and a few others have made, pointing out the shady ass companies out there, more than happy to rip off indie games devs, trying to make money off someone elses idea... the only difference here is that the company doing so have met a much wider level of success than anyone else has, with this sort of shitty business practice.
All of this is without even mentioning all the arrogant bullshit involving rovio... it's enough to piss anyone off.
Screw You.
I mean Angry Birds' cat toys?? I couldn't help but laugh after seeing them in my local Walmart.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow