Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.


Alan Wake PC vs Xbox 360: Gah! So pretty on max settings photo

I spent some time with Alan Wake on my beastly [brag] PC rig (featuring dual Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 cards) last night, running this already pretty game on max settings. As you'd imagine, it looks sooo much better than the Xbox 360 original.

We already knew that Remedy knows their PC sh*t, but Alan Wake PC is a really pretty reminder. There's so much detail on every surface that I feel like I missed a lot my first time around. In fact, running at top settings, the cutscenes look crappy compared to the game graphics. 

The game's lighting was already fantastic, but it really shines with all settings cranked. And in the dark, shadows are even more...shadowy. The enhanced light and darkness in the PC version somehow makes the game more scary, even if you've played through it before. Also scary, but in a different way: the high resolution product placement. 

In our gallery below you'll see some comparison shots. Of course, the dull, blurry ones are the Xbox 360 screens. To really appreciate the PC version you'll need to see it in motion.

LAUNCH GALLERY (7 IMAGES)
Photo Photo Photo Photo Photo Photo Photo









More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Dale North is Destructoid's Editor-In-Chief, a founding editor, and specialist in Japanese gaming. An accomplished musician, Dale was reporting from Japan during the earthquakes of 2011. Luckily, he got the fuck out alive and is home in America now with his wife and beloved corgi, Einstein. Dale is also a co-founder of Destructoid's sister anime site Japanator. Likes Corgis, Sega Saturn, PSP, iPhone, Photographic tools. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

53 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

DrNo0's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:05
DrNo0
whats the point of owning a xbox
Spaz's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:05
Spaz
I actually like the realistic tone of the cut scenes of the game. The graphics though do show their age with the face models.
ElektroDragon's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:11
ElektroDragon
It's not that different at all. I'll keep my Achievements, thank you very much, since this was not a GFWL title.
Enzi's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:11
Enzi
@DrNo0: Being able to play pirated games without pissing of the developers!
Jinx 01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:11
Jinx 01
*CUE FLAME WAR*
TurboKill's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:14
TurboKill
Dale, could you pull some strings for some company to send me an awesome rig like yours? I'm on a macbook. 'nuff said.
Gorescream's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:14
Gorescream
is the xbox version capped at 30 fps?
Harris Hatsworth's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:16
Harris Hatsworth
I've never felt like Jonathan Holmes until now. I honestly couldn't tell which picture was which and which was supposed to look better until I saw the labels. I mean, I can see everything I'm supposed to and tell what it all is.
tekbunny's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:16
tekbunny
MASTER RACE!

also, elektro needs glasses.
Enzi's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:26
Enzi
@Harris Hatsworth: Congratulations, you're the living proof now that jerking off makes blind.
Mr Andy Dixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:27
Mr Andy Dixon
@DrNo0

"whats the point of owning a xbox"

Considering just ONE of the two videocards in Dale's beastly rig costs twice as much as an entire Xbox 360, I'd say there's a pretty good reason right there.

(And yes, I know Dale's PC is overkill and the game would run just fine on a $500 setup. But still!)
Emshumi's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:28
Emshumi
@Harris Look at the high res-imagines, the smaller screens in the gallery is a poor representation.
Kinthalis's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 13:56
Kinthalis
People who can't see a difference:

Stop looking at the 420p shots in the article. Download the full rez. shots. Then picture it in motion ;)

If you still do not see a difference, get you to an ophthalmologist stat!
Nick Jones's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 14:22
Nick Jones
I'm not a PC gamer, but I appreciate Remedy taking the time to polish up the original game and -then- port it to the PC. A lot of developers get lazy and just try to shoehorn their console games onto PC, and it ends up being jam-packed with technical issues (hi RAGE). But these developers took their time to improve upon what they had rather than releasing it immediately to make a quick buck. This will definitely make the PC gamers happy.

Good job, Remedy. You've earned my respect, and I don't even game on PCs.
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 14:23
fetusmilk
sooooo the sharpness has been turned up?
ralphster's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 14:28
ralphster
Well the Xbox version is like 2 years older...
Thane Vickers's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 14:38
Thane Vickers
@fetusmilk

Yup. Just the sharpness. And the lighting... And the resolution... And the textures.. and the physics.
Timboxxx's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 14:51
Timboxxx
PC GAMING MASTER RACE?

MOAR LIKE PC GAMING MASTER RACE, EMIRATE!?

But seriously the one with the school bus scene shot shows the serious contrast but this is the difference between DX9c and DX10 rendering after all.
dtomek's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 15:01
dtomek
Everyone is well aware that PC's will deliver a technically superior experience. The dissention comes from the fact that the difference simply does not justify the cost. There's no need to attempt to persuade us lesser gamers of the financial justifications. If it's worth it to you, it should have no bearing that it is not worth it to others.
ZeroDown's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 15:09
ZeroDown
@dtomek

Cry harder.
fmaguy91's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 15:16
fmaguy91
Is it bad that I like the 360 graphics better...
Kanten's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 15:27
Kanten
And Microsoft said this game wasn't meant to be played on a PC. Apparently they don't know how important detail is to the atmosphere of a game like this.
Thane Vickers's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 15:50
Thane Vickers
Turn off all of the lights and play this game with headphones. It turns into a legitimately terrifying game.
Neveryll's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:26
Neveryll
Ummm DUH! Really are you that ridiculous that you wouldn't have known this already? PC has better hardware period. Any dev who takes some time working with their code will get it to look better on the PC.

PCs

Dev Pros

Superior hardware available
No middle man for updates

Dev Cons

Large amount of drivers and hardware types to support


User Pros

Games look better usually
Possible to get good deals on older games through digital distribution sometimes

User Cons

Hardware costs more for top end machine than a console
No used game market to buy from
Drivers and OS need to be updated by user to fix some issues

Consoles

Dev Pros

Standardized hardware for development

Dev Cons

Hardware is below cutting edge technology so limits AI and graphics
All updates must go through third party

User Pros

Consoles cost way less than most PC setups
All updates are done by console managers
Used game market to buy games from

User Cons

Console sometimes limits some content to games
Lower quality graphics vs PC

There done. :p
El Conrado's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:27
El Conrado
@ZeroDown
Cry less.
Jinx 01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:36
Jinx 01
"The dissention comes from the fact that the difference simply does not justify the cost."

I game on PC because it's cheaper. It only seems more expensive if:

a) You forget that you use a computer for more than gaming- you're just putting the money you'd spend on a regular pc and console in one basket.

b) You don't get that games are way cheaper on PC. I probably save $200-$300 a year compared to if I'd bought the same games on console.

c) You forget that you're on your 3rd 360 and 2nd PS3. Oh, and that you bought two inferior systems instead of slapping a $150 video card in the PC you already have.

Granted, this doesn't apply to everyone- some people have Mac or laptops, for example. But even then, gaming on PC is a way better deal long term. Nevermind that you are getting a superior experience, and your games will run on your next 'system' and look even nicer.
The Cast's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:37
The Cast
There isn't that much of a difference...which tells that Remedy really knows how to craft graphics regardless of what system they make their games on.
El Conrado's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:41
El Conrado
@Jinx 01
You don't contradict exaggeration with more exaggeration.

Most people don't go and buy 3 Xboxes or 2 PS3s; that's just hyperbole.

The fact is that whether or not one is cheaper than the other depends completely on the habits of the person, and generalizations serve no argument.
Jinx 01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:47
Jinx 01
@El Conrado:
I'm talking about the very high failure rate those two consoles have.

You're right, though, it depends on the person. All I'm saying is that for some people gaming on PC can actually be a much better deal. The assumption that gaming on PC is more expensive is flat out wrong.
Neveryll's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:54
Neveryll
Chuckle. And graphics cards and motherboards never fry either huh? <Rolls eyes>
El Conrado's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:56
El Conrado
@Jinx 01
"I'm talking about the very high failure rate those two consoles have."

Dude (girl?), remember that PC hardware has failure rates, too.

My guess is that the individual parts of a PC are more prone to failure than a whole console, and a potentially more costly to repair depending of the damage.

It's very dependent on the situation.

I agree that the idea that you need to spend enthusiast-levels of money just to play on a PC is pretty silly, though. It's an old stigma that doesn't go away.
Stains's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:57
Stains
I don't mind waiting for a game on PC as long as it looks better (graphics-wise). I think that is the rub here. If you want it first, rush out and grab the 360 version. If you want the ultimate version (and can wait), get the PC version.

I do not take my own advice. I have a pretty good PC and a 360. Alan Wake came with my 360 as a download but I never even tried it due to my large backlog (curse you Steam!). Now I have bought it again on the PC since it looks better. Now I will never go back to play the 360 version. If it was just a straight port I never would have bought it twice. Remedy gave me a better product so they got more of my money. Simple! :)

Stains
kid23455's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 16:57
kid23455
More porn for PC fanboys.
Seriously, can we at least wait for gaming to become an accepted artistic medium before we start hating on certain groups of it?
Stains's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 17:04
Stains
Also, addressing the cost of PC gaming... If that is all you used the PC for, it can be quite pricey. I spend around $1000 every 2-3 years on hardware. However, I also use my PC for working at home, CAD, surfing, ripping discs, re-encoding video, drawing, photo editing... lots of stuff! The gaming rig does all of this stuff faster and better, so there is more value for your money there than just being able to play cool games. That helps my brain justify the cost as I play my cool games.
Jinx 01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 17:12
Jinx 01
@El Conrado:
I see what you're saying... but a console has most of the same parts, they are just smooshed together. And the modular nature of a PC means that I only have to replace the part that goes bad, not the entire system.

You're right, though, PCs aren't immune to failures. I just get irritated when someone who has multiple consoles and/or has replaced them, and/or has a regular PC/Mac, acts like somehow I spent more money than them o_O

And I'm a dude, I just <3 Motoko. Actually, this is Cryotek, had to remake my account due to some website issues.
Nitex's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 17:21
Nitex
It looks far better on my PC than yours thanks to the FXAA Tool. The sharpness you can achieve is fairly nuts. If you used this on Skyrim you know what I mean.
BoomingEchoes's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 17:55
BoomingEchoes
Eh, both look great to me. I see where the PC versions going to be better, but thats the same point where I can see ALL PC games looking better. Being able to mess with setting makes a huge difference.
Icehearted's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 18:11
Icehearted
@DrNo0
The benefit of paying to play game online and having a way to watch TV through a series of hoops rather than simply switching to my TV's tuner and the cable I already get.
TrevHead's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 18:53
TrevHead
"There's no need to attempt to persuade us lesser gamers of the financial justifications."

@dtomek one thing that I always notice with non PC gamers is that they dont like PC gamers nerding out over PC games because it makes them feel like lesser gamers. Most of us PC gamers dont have £500 graphics cards. Does that make us lesser gamers than those who do?

Only console wars fanboys think like that
Nicholas Patrick's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 19:26
Nicholas Patrick
Looks exactly the same... just like your emo hair.
dgschrei's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 21:29
dgschrei
Well I absolutely adore PC gaming, but seriously: Those Screenshots you took there look absolutely identical. The only difference there is, is because it's virtually impossible to reproduce the scene in exactly the same way on 2 systems.

(e.g. you're not gonna get the waves to look identical and so forth)

I'm all for promoting that my PC will render any console into the ground and do so absolutely silently ;) . But then we should probably use some games, where the difference in fidelity is much more noticable.
Skribble's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 21:41
Skribble
Anti-aliasing, soft shadows, hi-res textures, volumetric fog, longer render distance. Not exactly huge changes, but it makes a bit of a difference, and they're more than welcome. I borrowed the game from my friend and played it on my 360 and I enjoyed it quite a bit, but I never did get to play the extra episodes. I look forward to playing them on my PC.
walrusmustdash's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 22:27
walrusmustdash
I think there's a level at which I become incapable of noticing better graphics. I've looked through these pictures twice now, and I literally cannot tell which ones are supposed to be the PC shots.
JohnGrisham's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 22:47
JohnGrisham
RDR >
Hriki's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 23:51
Hriki
Of course it looks better on PC.....Also most people arguing PC is too expensive, let me point something out: Did you buy your tv for gaming? Seeing most here are core gamers i would assume so? I mean I did with both my tv purchases. Not so cheap when you factor that in. Buuuuuuuuttttt I am tech hoarder and refuse to play console games on a tv that doesnt look (IMO) the best. So maybe just me. Also dont say 'mah tv is for other thangs tooz!!' so is my PC ;)
Pens41ife's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/22/2012 00:58
Pens41ife
Really the photos look almost identical with a few subtle differences and don't do much justice for the PC version , I'll give it a go just because I love me some Alan Wake.
Skyblade's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/22/2012 03:19
Skyblade
Are people here saying 'it looks the same' forgetting the jump in quality from 720p to 1080p in the PC version?? And honsetly, if you say that makes no difference... wow.
Fenrir151's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/22/2012 04:27
Fenrir151
Perhaps I need my eyes testing because I can't tell the difference. Maybe a slight bit of 'definition' in one but definitely not enough for me to say for certain which one was on which system. Perhaps we would need to see it on your super awesome system for the full effect.
Occams electric toothbrush's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/22/2012 08:51
Occams electric toothbrush


Know what Sarah?




What's that Bill?




PC games are neat. So are console games. Talking about master race and all that flibbity jibbity takes away from the fact that we all enjoy video games in a variety of ways and that's pretty awesome.[/i]




I'M A MOMMA GRIZZLY!




I hope you get hit by a dump truck filled with aborted babies.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!