I posted a few days ago that Devin Moore, the nutjob who killed two cops and a dispatcher in 2003, was appealing his death sentence by blaming the rampage on Grand Theft Auto. Although it's obvious that some morons will use Moore's idiotic statement to their own anti-game advantage, it's nice to see that not all media outlets are completely retarded. Alabama newspaper The Montgomery Adviser quite rightly put Moore's selfish claims into perspective with an editorial:
The notion that the courts should take into account whether someone was exposed to violent video games as a reason for that person murdering someone has no real place in the criminal judicial process…
If courts started routinely to allow exposure to fictional violence in such things as video games and movies as a way to avoid or minimize punishment for violent acts, it could have a huge, negative effect on the nation's entire criminal process. Every violent criminal has been exposed to fictional violence in some form…
Millions of people, young and old, choose to watch violent movies and play violent video games and never harm anyone because of it.
Parents should monitor what their children watch… Consumer groups should campaign to minimize violent content… But those arguments belong in the court of public opinion, not in a criminal courtroom where a murder trial is being conducted.
Moore has currently bolstered his pathetic appeal by playing the race card, one of the most overplayed cards of all time. As ever, others will buy into that crap since it serves their own ends, but hopefully some more intelligent people can see through his garbage very much like the above writer. No videogame ever made has truly caused somebody to commit murder, and I do like it when people outside the games industry are sensible enough to admit that too.
Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize.
Likes
PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3
Meet the rest of the team
| BBcode help |
| [b]Bold text[/b] |
Bold text |
| [i]Italic text[/i] |
Italic text |
| [url]http://www.dtoid.com/[/url] |
http://www.dtoid.com |
| [url=http://www.dtoid.com/]Web link[/url] |
Web link |
| [img]http://www.example.com/robot.jpg[/img] |
 |
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
14 comments | showing # 1 to 14
|
Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!
This guy is such a piece of shit. First games, then the race card... he just needs to own up to what he did
is that harsh?
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070920/OPINION01/709200319/1012/OPINION
If you can be held accountable for doing an illegal activity when explicitly commanded to do so by someone who is in charge of giving you orders ( http://en.allexperts.com/q/Military-Law-927/illegal-military-order.htm ) what POSSIBLE grounds could anyone ever conceive that an outside source's indirect influence would reduce liability of any resulting actions.