surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
Tis a shame that 99% of the people that buy games have no idea what despicable acts activision have committed...so they can pretty much continue to be soul sucking demons and sales won't be affected much
I like the last line of this post. I would probably still buy activision games regardless of how evil they are, but they just don't make any games I'm interested in. It's nothing but guitar hero and Call of duty sequels.
Pssht I Don't care how evil they are I still like Call Of Duty:Black-ops well that's the only game I like that's a shooter from activision...Oh Well who cares they will go to court EA will probably win then life goes on.
Not sure why Activision cares, since their next CoD will make an ungodly amount of money, regardless of who develops it. I seriously doubt that West & Zampella making a new game for EA is going to do as well, since I highly doubt most of the people that buy CoD games are very aware of the politics going on in gaming, and instead recognize the brand, not the developers. Still, can't wait to see how this turns out.
Wait, Activision listens to game pitches? I thought they just said "If it's a shooter, make it Call of Duty and we'll publish it. If not, gtfo."
And they wonder why that evil label has been slapped on them, These alligations are BS at best and at worst......
I miss old activision, when they listened to people and were not obvious money grubbing whores.
I miss old activision, when they listened to people and were not obvious money grubbing whores.
Jesus surely didn't die for the sins of Activision. Merry Xmas and let a shower of backhands rain upon Activision and it's furor of lawyers, that likely outstaff developers 10 to 1.
$400 million?! Black Ops just hit the billion dollar mark, what the fuck does Activision even care about another $400 million for?
just one of the reasons i don't buy activision games. strong arm tactics may work in the stores like walmart, but they do not win in court cases. maybe activision will buy the judge.
just one of the reasons i don't buy activision games. strong arm tactics may work in the stores like walmart, but they do not win in court cases. maybe activision will buy the judge.
Activision, further proving that they're the top dog when it comes to evil. EA's day in the sun is over.
If I remember correctly wasn't there contract with Activision nearly up? I mean I'd leave to if all my boss wanted me to do was the same damn thing.
How much does anyone want to bet that Respawn's next game advertisement will have "from the makers of cod4 and MW2" in it somewhere.
How much does anyone want to bet that Respawn's next game advertisement will have "from the makers of cod4 and MW2" in it somewhere.
Hopefully Infinity Ward will start working on some more robust AI for their next project, and actually take some risks with the engine that runs the show, rather than just making the safe sequels Activision would have wanted.
I appreciate the improved story they've brought to their games and the genre as a whole, and I realize how the mechanics have helped that. But I don't think I can really take any FPS seriously that just does nothing but beam new enemies into existence, usually behind cover or inside buildings or behind player-not-allowed doors, to disguise the fact that they just popped in out of nowhere when the story required it. It's basically just Monster Closets to create big dramatic set pieces, and it's a sloppy way to design a game that's supposedly about conveying the experience of real combat. Stealth, planning how to achieve objectives in different ways, and the feeling of danger work a lot better when they aren't always completely trumped by 'what is supposed to be happening according to the story.'
I appreciate the improved story they've brought to their games and the genre as a whole, and I realize how the mechanics have helped that. But I don't think I can really take any FPS seriously that just does nothing but beam new enemies into existence, usually behind cover or inside buildings or behind player-not-allowed doors, to disguise the fact that they just popped in out of nowhere when the story required it. It's basically just Monster Closets to create big dramatic set pieces, and it's a sloppy way to design a game that's supposedly about conveying the experience of real combat. Stealth, planning how to achieve objectives in different ways, and the feeling of danger work a lot better when they aren't always completely trumped by 'what is supposed to be happening according to the story.'
Here you go, Dv8thwonder.
Apparently it has already been done, this was just a quick google image search away.
Its funny that EA might have been in the wrong here yet everyone is all ACTIVISION IS TEH DEVIL.
Are your favorite games not being developed anymore? Did indie devs vanish? Last I checked things are still fine and dandy, enough with all the Activision hate, West and Zampella where always very petty about Treyarch working on CoD as well, more to the point, both companies are huge, Activision would not being going after EA if they didn't have evidence, they obviously don't need the money, there's more to this story than what we know.
Are your favorite games not being developed anymore? Did indie devs vanish? Last I checked things are still fine and dandy, enough with all the Activision hate, West and Zampella where always very petty about Treyarch working on CoD as well, more to the point, both companies are huge, Activision would not being going after EA if they didn't have evidence, they obviously don't need the money, there's more to this story than what we know.
Everyone needs to back of Activision. Think of all the great games they come up with and even all of the charity work they do - like the Call of Duty Endowment. http://stars.ign.com/objects/142/14216734.html
"causing them to attempt a defection."
Um...
"causing them to defect."
I mean, they did defect, right? Though, admittedly, the chronology may still be a bit hazy.
Things turn sour > Opposition comes a-courtin' > Defection > Fired/Quit [?]
Things turn sour > Opposition comes a-courtin' > Fired/Quit > Defection [?]
Um...
"causing them to defect."
I mean, they did defect, right? Though, admittedly, the chronology may still be a bit hazy.
Things turn sour > Opposition comes a-courtin' > Defection > Fired/Quit [?]
Things turn sour > Opposition comes a-courtin' > Fired/Quit > Defection [?]
If you are reading this website, you know enough such that you are directly responsible for and tasked with the burden of making sacrifices in order to restore the rule of law to the United Sta640-864 dumps/000-978 dumps/70-515 dumps/000-119 dumps/70-667 dumpstes of America. The Constitution provides us with the tools necessary to succeed. It's time to ask yourself what you believe. It's time to ask yourself what you are willing350-018 dumps/312-50 dumps/E20-001 dumps/156-215.71 dumps/350-029 dumps to sacrifice to the idea of what the Constitution stands for.
Here, it’s no doubt that you have a creative and a clearly structured review. You have done an stunning process on this particular message.
Many people will obviously agree that your post was really interesting and that I can’t wait around to acquire more information.
<a rel="follow" href="http://teampulido.com/">water damage Murrieta CA</a>
Many people will obviously agree that your post was really interesting and that I can’t wait around to acquire more information.
<a rel="follow" href="http://teampulido.com/">water damage Murrieta CA</a>
follow
