Quantcast


Activision: Gamers 'demand' to pay more for Call of Duty photo

Evil publisher Activision loves the color of money, and apparently having the biggest game franchises in the world just doesn't rake in enough cash for the nefarious company. With that in mind, Activision is looking at ways to profit even more from big names like Call of Duty, "monetizing" the experience even more than it does now.

"It's definitely an aspiration that we see potential in, particularly as we look at different business models to monetize the online gameplay," says CFO Thomas Tippl. "There's good knowledge exchange happening between the Blizzard folks and our online guys. We have great experience also on Call of Duty with the success we had on Xbox Live and PlayStation Network. A lot of that knowledge is getting actually built into the Battle.Net platform and the design of that.

"I think it's been mutually beneficial, and you should expect us to test and ultimately launch additional online monetization models of some of some of our biggest franchises like Call of Duty."

Does that sound bad to you? It shouldn't. Activision apparently thinks that people like you "demanded" to pay more for Call of Duty: "Our gamers are telling us there's lots of services and innovation they would like to see that they're not getting yet. From what we see so far, additional content, as well as all the services Blizzard is offering, is that there is demand from the core gamers to pay up for that."

Did you tell Activision that this is what you wanted? Own up, who bloody gave Activision this idea!?








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

96 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

Kahoona's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:05
Kahoona
What delusional assholes. This is what happens when the only concern in your life is money and obtaining more of it.
Issun's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:11
Issun
Man, what a lot of douches :they raise the price of a game they know will sell and then asks us to pay more? They are quite masochistic these day, and we are not like them.
covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:14
covah
I had the longest drunk rant about how big of an asshole Acitivision is.

Fucking Call of Duty 7 is going to have pay to play aspects, I'm calling it. And all because Treyarch will just be like "OKAY! THATS COOL!" leaving Infinity Ward fucked the next time they make a CoD game.
lAboMbA's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:14
lAboMbA
i would gladly pay an additional 10 bucks for the PC version if it had a drop down console and dedicated serv....oh wait, it does cost an extra 10 bucks and doesn't include any of that. Hell, I'd pay 80 bucks for the pc version of MW2 to have the console and dedicated server support. I just can't FPS on a console.
CocoJambo's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:16
CocoJambo
@Kahoona

WHAT exactly happens?


We all know there's a big and sad probability that they will make this monthly payment thing true and most of you idiots will gobble it up.
Crimsondramon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:17
Crimsondramon
I'm not paying a single cent for more Call of Duty >:) Just give em free XD
EdgyDude's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:30
EdgyDude
"Did you tell Activision that this is what you wanted? Own up, who bloody gave Activision this idea!?"

All those that picked up MW2's on launch day with the hiked up price tag, that's who. Me? not one of them, i'm surely getting it, don't doubt it, but i'll wait a bit for a second hand or a price drop when the hype madness cools down.
jase52476's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:30
jase52476
Maybe they can just install a meter into the game that charges you, per minute, as you play it.
Jonathan Beck's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:32
Jonathan Beck
Dear Blizzard,

I love you, however, if you turn Battle.net into Xbox Live 2.0 I will have no choice but to kill you all, forever. Okay? I swear to christ if Activision somehow get's their stupid paws into Blizzards work on Starcraft 2 it will be the end of PC Gaming as we know it. DO.NOT.MESS.WITH.STARCRAFT.AND.BLIZZARD.FANS.
Chronic Logic's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:33
Chronic Logic
Snorting one too many lines of powdered 100 dollar bills must've fucked up his logic.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:34
StingingVelvet
You can guys can call him names all you like but the man knows what he is talking about (UNFORTUNATELY).

Something like 10 million people have shown they are willing to pay monthly for World of Warcraft. Something like 15 million pay to use their own internet on Xbox Live. Consumers have shown they will pay fees for things like this, and if they start a monthly fee based Call of Duty multiplayer game, where your $15 a month or whatever gets you new maps and weapons and such on a timely basis and perhaps dedicated servers and consistent anti-cheat, TONS of people would pay for it.

TONS.

Don't blame this man for seeing an opportunity. If people wouldn't pay for it he would never do it... but people will. Lots of people will.
InfraredChimera's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:36
InfraredChimera
If CoD moved to this type of "pay to play" service then I will gladly hang up my coat and say "way to go Activision, you just ran another franchise into the ground".
Gyrael's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:40
Gyrael
It's just funny now.
Ninjabunny's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:41
Ninjabunny
Yet another reason I'm glad I didn't pick up MW2. To me MW2 is to MW what Win7 is to Vista. Sure, there are some pretty decent things that got improved but honestly not enough to make me want to shell out for full price. So unless I can find a deal for like 50% off I'm not buying it (and trust me I want to). Besides, there are plenty of great games to be playing right now...such as Demon's Souls
fadecy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:43
fadecy
I blame you stupid f***ers who bought every map pack they brought out. You know they just hold maps back right? They don't have one guy in a corner working on maps after the game launches. Consumers are stupid though, see MW2 boycott, see people paying £8 for 2 fucking Killzone2 Maps. You just paid a quarter of the price of the game for 2 maps you nutjobs.
Balaamsafe's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:43
Balaamsafe
If they charge subscriptions for COD franchises like battlefield and first party titles will happily sweep up the millions who jump ship.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:45
StingingVelvet
@ Rampage Mendez

Depending on how you use your comp Win7 is massively better and worth every penny. Gamer? Graphic artist? Sound designer? Web professional? I would suggest Win7 very much.

If all you use your comp for is surfing the web though, you can probably stick with XP until you need a new comp altogether.

Side note: Win7 is $30 for students, very nice price.
waves's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:51
waves
OK, I admit it. It was me. I told them I would totally pay $60. But then I found it for $45 on ebay. Sorry guys!
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 09:57
Xzyliac
I was waiting for the eventual post that cut through the "Kotick is evil," bullshit and actually presented an argument and it seems StingingVelvet did it. And convinced me to buy Win7. :P

Like I say about Acti all the time they may not be morally just but they have a sound business strategy with exception of the PC version of MW2 which was just bullocks.

I mean how many times does somebody post a comment suggesting an idea an then say something like "I'd pay a hundred billion dollars for dat har har har." Koticks just takin' you up on your offer.

NOTE: Didn't buy MW2. Just thought I'd toss that out there.
jasondm300's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:02
jasondm300
@ Jonathan Beck
a p.s. to your letter:
Blizzard, there is a reason people still play diablo 2 online on battle.net today. if you mess up diablo 3 by making me pay, i'll cry
NuDimon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:09
NuDimon
They do this because people keep throwing money at them. :p
Wintersocks's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:14
Wintersocks
@Ruben Hanssen

TRUTH. HE SPEAKS IT. That's why I will never buy another CoD, tony hawk, Guitar Hero, OR BELOVED BLIZZARD GAME, unless it's used.
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:17
Kaspar
Seeing the amount of times he mentioned Blizzard, I'm getting scared.
Real fucking scared.
BGFUSAB's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:19
BGFUSAB
I won't pay a monthly fee to play Diablo 3 on battle.net. And since Diablo is best played on multi-player, I guess that means I wouldn't play it at all. That's kind of disappointing. I hope battle.net doesn't go that way.
DunKology's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:24
DunKology
Following all the MW2 issues, I remembering having a debate with a friend about what Call of Duty could get away with before everyone abandons the franchise.

I think this could be the answer to that question.
moose39's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:27
moose39
I bet if Activision made a game, where the more people buy the game, the more Activision loses money and goes out of business, everyone would buy it. I would buy three copies.
Face's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:27
Face
To the Boycottmobile!
Timmeh's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:29
Timmeh
Dumbasses keep paying so why wouldn't they do it?

Fucking people. Bitch about price increases and shit, then go out and buy the game anyway.
nowherekid03's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:41
nowherekid03
ands thats why i returned my CoD game
Darren Nakamura's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:49
Darren Nakamura
I don't think anybody is literally *telling* them that, but they are inferring it from the ridiculous amounts of money they have already made off of Modern Warfare 2.
GoldenGamerXero's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:56
GoldenGamerXero
I would think they would be being told the very opposite. Modern Warfare 2 was discounted EVERYWHERE here in the UK and was one of their best selling games yet. If the price had actually been at the recommended retail price I wouldn't have been so sure.

Or do numbers only count when they prove that fucking people over will help them.
GeorgeMichael Kalafut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:59
GeorgeMichael Kalafut
It isn't so hard to understand. When gaming became cool for the popular kids, said kids had more money to spend. On top of that, gamers are spineless pieces of excrement as evidenced by the mass of people that bought MW2 after vowing not to.

This is where we're going, like it or not; as much as those of us with brains would like to do about it, I think you need to talk to anyone that bought MW2 on PC about that.
Fearzone's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 10:59
Fearzone
So what Activision is saying is that gamers want more and they are willing to pay for more. Nothing wrong with that. Perfectly reasonable business model.
Novakaine's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:00
Novakaine
And the HD business model keeps killing the industry. This is why I do not have a 360 (not paying to play), this is why I have never purchased any form of DLC, and this is why I buy 98% of my PS3 games used. People need to realize we vote with our wallet.

It's ironic how HD/"hardcore" gamers screamed that the Wii was going to alter the industry for the worse, when in fact the HD business model has done far more harm than the Wii perhaps ever will.
wanderingpixel's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:00
wanderingpixel
Steam is Jesus. Battle.net is the anti-christ.
kmartkid's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:05
kmartkid
I'm very puzzled how a wonderful website like Destructoid can be invaded by a metric fuckton of whining 12 year olds and still remain my homepage on 3 different computers and an iPhone. It's actually a simple concept. If you are too fucking cheap to actually "gasp" pay for the services that you use on an everyday basis, then don't pay. But because some of us who CHOOSE to dish out some coin for things we enjoy, we are labeled as mindless sheep. Fucking grow up and move on, coming to the premier gaming news site on the Internet and degrading people for differing gaming choices doesn't make you cool or hip. It makes you seem spoiled and immature. Jstfuapg applies to you!!

Also news flash, Jim Sterling is a genious. Enough ranting, I'm going to play MW 2. I hope they drop a map pack soon. This game is the tits!!
GeorgeMichael Kalafut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:06
GeorgeMichael Kalafut
Apologies for double-postan, but I'm surprised by the amount of posters on this that weren't already aware that Activision is completely raping Blizzard.

There's tons of evidence for it, but I give you the No LAN debacle. After announcing the lack of LAN, people bitched, and we got "connected lan". Problem with that is...ever try running a 30, 50, even 100 person lan? Keeping them all connected, or getting any of them connected considering most large lans are hosted in warehouses and the like, is a pure joke.

This is why I have a wii. Occasionally I get a gem like No More Heroes or Muramasa, and there's none of the drama. Noone's coming after my old-school for cash.
Sparta2020's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:20
Sparta2020
notice dey never mention da pc version as a success, sad
matrixdude171's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:23
matrixdude171
This guy, is just so far paid to get stuck up his own ass he thinks he's god. Next they're going to charge for online services, and ignore the single player campaign even more. $60 for a shitty 4 hour campaign? I'm suprised people would pay $15 per hour of single player, let alone spend time on multiplayer with knife spammers. Truly an example of the dying of single player missions, and people's realizations that you're only going to get charged more for this stuff from here on out.
hawtpokkitz's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:35
hawtpokkitz
Wait. Activision still makes games? Last time I checked, all of their "new games" were just last year's games repackaged. I'mma stick with 2K games where we have Bioshock and Borderlands.
rallyf1's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:41
rallyf1
from a business perspective, his logic is valid. now it's up to the consumer to prove him wrong, which by the way will never happen. just like xbox live, they squeal demanding MS to make it free yet they still pay for it. gamers are worse than crack addicts.....what a shame!
Electrium's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 11:51
Electrium
Ohhhh...mmmmm, yes, master Activision, take my money, take it all awaaaayy...
Midgetsnowman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:05
Midgetsnowman
leave it to activision to take quality of life services like Faction Transfer or Race change that Blizzard invented to make customers of WoW happier, as proof that people wanna pay more for console games.
Schmo0zle's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:19
Schmo0zle
I have yet to buy any DLC for any game, so I personally think this guy is an ass hat.

$60 is a lot for a game in the first place. If you're not going to support it for free or cheap, why not just rent it for $5? There is no way I'm going to download like 3 DLC's for a game at $10 a pop so that when all is said and done, I've spent $100 on the game.
Necro BABS's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:23
Necro BABS
Yeah screw you babies, map packs are coming and despite the bitching people buy buy buy!!!!
Excel-2011's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:24
Excel-2011
Sorry.
dwolfwood's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:44
dwolfwood
I'll admit it. I bought CRYSTAL DEFENDERS!
Pussmangus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:47
Pussmangus
and this is why i am waiting to get my hands on a USED copy of MW2, and i have a whole nice little plan to go along with it :D
N0R3M0RS3's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:53
N0R3M0RS3
We're all about to get Bobby Kotick'd!
Dr Awesome's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/15/2009 12:54
Dr Awesome
And yet of all the people complaining about it'd, I'd be willing to bet most of them bought the game anyway.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!