Quantcast


According to at least one guy at EA,  you can have too much variety photo

According to EA's head of international publishing, Gerhard Florin, we would all be better off with one unified gaming platform -- as opposed to the multitude of consoles and handhelds that currently vie for our attention. Speaking with the BBC, he envisions just that in as little as 15 years. How so? Well taking into consideration that set-top boxes are continually improving and that steaming HDTV streams and Internet is already happening -- it's just a matter of time before the one barrier that's caused division among gamers is removed: multiple platforms. What about competition and all that jazz that we've been programmed to believe is necessary to foster innovation? He's got it covered:

"Competition was required to ensure the pace of technology was maintained. Going forward that is irrelevant. Gaming will just require potentially a £49.99 box from Tesco made in China with a hard drive, a wi-fi connection and a games engine inside. It's basically a boiled-down PC."

Personally, I'm still not completely sold on the idea of a single platform being the answer to all of our prayers, but I can certainly appreciate some of the positive aspects of such a move. It would prove to be the proverbial undoing of the fanboy wars (right now, pretty much the entire "big three" have pissed me off in one way or another), if nothing else. It probably will never happen, but just for the hell of it -- how do you feel about this? Would a single console make you happier, or would the consequences prove to be much worse than we anticipated?

Since I'm one of the few people on the Internet who will publicly admit to liking EA and what they bring to the table (minus the sports titles that I couldn't possibly care less about), I'll leave out the worn out jabs concerning monopolies.

[Via BBC News -- Thanks Justin/Joe]






Contests Official Rules



No Purchase Required to Enter or Win

1. Eligibility: Destructoid.com contests are usually provided by sponsors who, due to customs and shipping costs (yay budgets), often limit participation to individuals who are legal residents of the fifty (50) United States (unless otherwise stated) and are 12 years of age. We encourage our overseas friends to be super sneaky and make a friend in the United States who can receive your prize, and then you two figure out the customs/logistics. Be cautious about who you trust, obviously. Employees of destructoid.com, their advertising or promotion agencies, those involved in the production, development, implementation or handling of Contests, any agents acting for, or on behalf of the above entities, their respective parent companies, officers, directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, licensees, service providers, prize suppliers any other person or entity associated with the Contests (collectively “Contest Entities”) and/or the immediate family (spouse, parents, siblings and children) and household members (whether related or not) of each such employee, are *not* eligible and will be fired and publicly beaten if are caught participating. All U.S., federal, state and local and regulations apply.

2. Agreement to Official Rules: Participation in the Contest constitutes entrant’s full and unconditional agreement to and acceptance of these Official Rules and the decisions of the Sponsor, which are final and binding. Winning a prize is contingent upon fulfilling all requirements set forth herein.

3. Entry Period: The start and end dates/times of each Contest (the “Entry Period”) will be posted on the applicable Contest site.

4. Entry: To enter a Contest, follow the instructions on the Contest site. Submission will result in one (1) entry. The number of times you can enter the Contest will be posted on the applicable Contest site. The use of any agencies or automated software to submit entries will void all entries submitted by that person.

5. Drawing: At the conclusion of the Entry Period, we will select the names of the potential winners in a random drawing of all eligible entries received during each Entry Period. The number of winners to be selected in a specific Contest will be posted on the applicable Contest site. The odds of being selected as a potential winner depend on the number of eligible entries received during the Entry Period. Potential winners will be contacted via email and will be asked to provide their full name, age and mailing address within a specified time period. If a potential winner does not respond within the timeframe stated in the notification email, we may select an alternate potential winner in his/her place at random from all entries received during the Entry Period. Limit one (1) prize per household per Contest.

6. Requirements of the Potential Winners: Winners will be notified by the e-mail address associated with their account on destructoid.com.com and/or receive a Private Message on destructoid.com.com or through a Twitter Direct Message/Facebook message. Winners have five (5) days from the original message alerting them of their winnings to respond and claim their prize. If no winner comes forward within five business days, the prize will be forfeited and raffled again where Destructoid's hardcore fans are most active (forums/community blogs/facebook group).

7. Prize(s): The prize(s) (including each prize’s approximate retail value) available to be won in a specific Contest will be posted on the Contest site. No cash or other substitution may be made, except by the Sponsor, who reserves the right to substitute a prize with another prize of equal or greater value if the prize is not available for any reason as determined by the Sponsor in its sole discretion. The winners are responsible for any taxes and fees associated with receipt or use of a prize. Prizes will be mailed between 1 to 45 business days after winners have replied with their required info.

8. General Conditions: In the event that the operation, security, or administration of the Contest is impaired in any way for any reason, including, but not limited to fraud, virus, or other technical problem, the Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, either: (a) suspend the Contest to address the impairment and then resume the Contest in a manner that best conforms to the spirit of these Official Rules; or (b) award the prizes at random from among the eligible entries received up to the time of the impairment. The Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual it finds to be tampering with the entry process or the operation of the Contest or to be acting in violation of these Official Rules or in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner. Any attempt by any person to undermine the legitimate operation of the Contest may be a violation of criminal and civil law, and, should such an attempt be made, the Sponsor reserves the right to seek damages from any such person to the fullest extent permitted by law. The Sponsor’s failure to enforce any term of these Official Rules shall not constitute a waiver of that provision. In case of a dispute as to the owner of an entry, entry will be deemed to have been submitted by the authorized account holder of the screen name from which the entry is made. The authorized account holder is defined as the natural person who is assigned to an e-mail address by an Internet access provider, online service provider, or other organization responsible for assigning e-mail addresses for the domain associated with the submitted e-mail address.

9.Release and Limitations of Liability: By participating in the Contest, entrants agree to release and hold harmless the Contest Entities from and against any claim or cause of action arising out of participation in the Contest or receipt or use of any prize, including, but not limited to: (a) unauthorized human intervention in the Contest; (b) technical errors related to computers, servers, providers, or telephone or network lines; (c) printing errors; (d) lost, late, postage-due, misdirected, or undeliverable mail; (e) errors in the administration of the Contest or the processing of entries; or (f) injury or damage to persons or property which may be caused, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from entrant’s participation in the Contest or receipt of any prize. Entrant further agrees that in any cause of action, the Contest Entities’ liability will be limited to the cost of entering and participating in the Contest, and in no event shall the Contest Entities be liable for attorney’s fees. Entrant waives the right to claim any damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, punitive, consequential, direct, or indirect damages.

10. Disputes: Except where prohibited, entrant agrees that any and all disputes, claims and causes of action arising out of, or connected with, the Contest or any prize awarded shall be resolved individually, without resort to any form of class action. All issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation and enforceability of these Official Rules, entrant’s rights and obligations, or the rights and obligations of the Sponsors in connection with the Contest, shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law rules (whether of the Commonwealth of Virginia or any other jurisdiction), which would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the Commonwealth of Virginia.

11. Contest Results: To enter the contest without needing to buy/sell anything or request a written copy of the name of the winners, send a self-addressed stamped envelope (stating the specific Contest you are requesting the winners for) to destructoid.com Contest Winners 260 King Street Suite 883, San Francisco California 94107. We run many contests, so please be specific in what you are requesting. Winner requests must be received within thirty (30) days from the end date of the applicable contest (they're always posted on our site though). Winners are usually posted the day following the contest on our contest section.

Lastly, Destructoid has the right to kick your ass and take away your prize if you are a total dickhead, so be cool and don't kick any puppies on your way to victory. Have fun with our contests and be a good sport when you win or lose. Remember: First you get the power, then you get the money, then get the baby.

 




More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

51 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev next 50 comments

king3vbo's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:06
king3vbo
No thanks. Competition makes the different companies work harder to be the best, and gamers benefit from that. Sure competition creates fanbois and lowball tactics, but I think in the end its a good thing.
Gameboi's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:10
Gameboi
I agree, but I can also see this guy's point. Competition makes us all hella-broke too. As much as I believe in the principles of competition and how it drives one company to outdo the next.... it sure would make our lives a helluva lot easier to pick up any game, and know that it will work once you bring it home. There's a lot to be said for simplicity.
Jetsetlemming's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:10
Jetsetlemming
It would make things worse.
Expected of an EA goon to be in favor of monopolies.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:12
Holyetheline
I personally like the variety of the consoles. It's nice because each console provides something different for each type of person. The competition between the companies is great because it proves what works and what doesn't. We, as consumers, need that choice of variety. We need developers who are focused on making great games for specific platforms. If everything was on one line then I would feel like the innovation is going away. There's never one path in doing something. I prefer to drive on the road that I want with the consoles that I love. They're all great machines but I really like the choices.
Gameboi's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:12
Gameboi
What I mean by this, is think about how much money you have tied up in multiple consoles in order to play what's hot at the moment. Worth thinking about.
A New Challenger's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:23
A New Challenger
One word: 3DO.

I like games on discs because I enjoy some nominal sense of ownership. If it's not multiplayer I don't want to be forced to go online in order to play it.
galagabug 's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:28
galagabug
COMMUNIST!
Corncobtacular's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:28
Corncobtacular
Gameboi,
If any of these companies (Sony, MS, Nintendo) were able to become monopolies i guarantee you that you would still pay through the nose for their console. The problem being that no competition means any price point they want.
Cheeburga's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:32
Cheeburga
Yeah, we need competition.
King hit the nail on the head.
freeman1's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:32
freeman1
It wouldn't be better, but it'll probably get to that point eventually.
thedude93's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:32
thedude93
Personally, i think innovation would decline. Think about the wii. Not totally consumed by technology, it took a step sideways in progression and decided to focus on the way you play. I'm not a Big N fan boy by any means, but i do respect their idea.

I say stick with variety and competition.
IceMax's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:33
IceMax
I think what he means is that there should be one universal platform architecture, and that several companies would produce these. Similar to the way dvd players are, several companies make different dvd players, yet any dvd will work with anyone of them.
flynsk's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:34
flynsk
First one to virtual reality wins!
Corak's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:34
Corak
Competition drives industry forwards, without it there is no incentive for companies to improve what they make what so ever. Imagine if there was only 1 auto manufacturer, and no one else was allowed to make a car. As others have said they could charge what they want and have complete control over that industry, really they could make the same car for hundreds of years and we would have no choice but to buy it? Not on my watch. Imagine where the gaming industry would be now if we only had 1 console to chose from? I think it would be pure shit.
Gameboi's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:34
Gameboi
@Ice_Max

That sounds about right, and an excellent idea. I'd back it.
jdub28's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:35
jdub28
ice max idea is what i hope eventually happens
jdub28's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:36
jdub28
corak there is no way you can post that many words and expect some one to read it with that avatar
Variable Gear's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:37
Variable Gear
According to one guy at Silicon Knights, this one guy at EA is smart.
Upgrayedd's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:39
Upgrayedd
Even if it meant the second coming of Christ it would never happen (not for long anyway).

There's too much money in video games and some other company would jump in on it.
rdaneel72's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:43
rdaneel72
Yeah, may we never forget the 3DO and the lessons it taugh us.

Nintendo will NEVER relinquish control over their own hardware. They design hardware and software in tandem. It is a key factor of thier success (and profitiblity). So, unless all other concede to Nintendo, this will NEVER happen.
bluemeep's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:46
bluemeep
You heard it here first, folks: the Phantom's release date is 2022.
Skytso's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:48
Skytso
So he wants one single platform for all games that people only have to decide which game and not which platform? I've heard of it...

It's called the PC.
jdub28's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:52
jdub28
yeah and i think upgrading a pc thru the next 5 years will cost more than a wii 360 and ps3 combined
donkeykong's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:57
donkeykong
I don't really see this happening.

Imagine for a second that my name is Nintendo, and that the year is 2022. Someone says to me "would you like to make less money?", my answer? "no".

I don't need to say anything else.
robotplague's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 13:59
robotplague
This is one of those things that we'll always hear about but will never happen. Getting all 3 companies together to co-operate would be a nightmare. Everyone has a different idea of what a console should be. I could however picture a company dropping out of the race leaving only 2 consoles, that to me is very feasible.
pwfd's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:01
pwfd
I think that's the big plot Microsoft is up tu for some time now... with the xbox you basically have a static pc where you can only play games and doesn't need to worry about changing graphic cards, increasing memory or improving cpu performance... one step further and you have a static pc where all software and games are easely produced because they know exactly what's the hardware you have at home...
Rockvillian's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:03
Rockvillian
I can only express my feelings through image.

BS3 Owner's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:05
BS3 Owner
Not a good idea...

First of all it's EA's Vision...

Second I don't want my gaming sytstem riddled w/Hax. Especially when on the internet w/it. Cough! (Microsoft)

Too much uniformality = LAYM Experience!
balth's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:06
balth
@Gameboi:

"steaming HDTV streams and Internet is already happening"

I don't think that's very healthy for the equipment! Good read, tho. I think this EA dude needs to quit whining.

It's too hard to program for multiple consoles.

No wonder they aren't #1 anymore.

Bitches.

that is all.
SourGr8pes's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:07
SourGr8pes
I was sold on the crying child.
shoop008's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:21
shoop008
If all the software companies worked together to come up with a video game system spec that any hardware maker could produce, I think it would work. There would still be tons of competition. Intel, IBM, and Sony would compete to get their processors in the system. ATI and NVidia would be competing for the video card. The companies that manufacture the systems would put in whatever they thought would sell the system; different sized hard drives, wireless, DVR funcionality, and controllers(all would have the same number of buttons). You would have companies like Westinghouse putting out cheap systems and companies like Samsung and Sony coming out with high end systems.
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:24
Maurice Tan
Good thing consoles only need a "Games engine" to run games!
zardoz's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:27
zardoz
Bad idea, no company has any right to insist on one vision, one size fits all unified console.

This is typical of EA, the company which have been releasing the same game in different packaging for over a decade. If healthy competition, the same competition found in every other healthy entertainment industry, is their real fear (which it is), then they should just make ports of the same games for every console available, and then release those ports every year...oh wait.
grrza's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:36
grrza
Yeah, if this is true, then why hasn't the PC taken the lead and vanquished consoles already?
A New Challenger's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:41
A New Challenger
Just another bit of bonus trivia for those who didn't pick up on it: Trip Hawkins, founder of EA, also founded 3DO.
zardoz's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:47
zardoz
^ Is that the same Trip Hawkins who talks absolute bullshit, 100% of the time?
RskimB's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 14:54
RskimB
It doesnt surprise me that EA is in favor of something like this. I prefer the competition between the varioius consoles however much of a strain it is on my wallet.
dgenerate's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 15:11
dgenerate
I think the key idea would be a single unified PLATFORM to develop for, while the hardware (which may vary) may not be exclusive to a single company.

I can't fucking stand having to buy so many consoles to play any (as in every) game that comes to market. Also having to spend an extra $200 per console for extra controllers sucks.
dgenerate's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 15:13
dgenerate
I don't care what you guys say, EA is a badass company.
Bob Muir's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 15:25
Bob Muir
One platform for everything? That would mean no competition and kill the market.
hippiepieces's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 15:43
hippiepieces
With one console there would still be competition but it would be software as opposed to hardware. If there was one system it could still be offered by multiple manufacturers much the same way DVD players are.
Tron Knotts's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 16:13
Tron Knotts
I believe in the one software format model as seen with PC's and DVD players. For home consoles it would actually increase inter-hardware compatition and therefore increasing hardware quality, decrease instances of forcing the consumer to buy three machines that basicly do the same thing just to play all the games they want, and therefore increasing general consumer confidence and interest in home consoles in general.

Picture the amazing level of compatition there would be if the Wii, the PS3, and the 360 all played the same games. Think of how hard each manufacturer would have to work to make their hardware the best. Nintendo could no longer rest on the idea that Mario, Zelda, and Smash Bros would guarantee console sales. Sony could no longer count just on Final Fantasy, Microsoft on Halo.

I think it's obivously better for the consumer for this to happen. Hardware would be cheaper, more powerful, and most importantly, you wouldn't have to ever by more than one console.

If you needed to buy one PC to do your school work, one play games, one to surf the interent, and one to download porn, do you think PC's would sell as well as they do?

If you had to buy one DVD player to watch action movies, on the buy comedies, and one for dramas, do you think the DVD format would have ever over taken VHS?

I don't think so. And like wise, I don't think that gaming consoles will ever be as accepted as DVD players and PC's until there is one universal format.
zardoz's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 17:52
zardoz
Tron, good points.

But I'm convinced that Nintendo as we know them, couldn't possibly exist in a universal format. Who else is willing to take risks like Nintendo? I can think of no other company that would take a hugely successful global brand like the Gameboy, and just ditch it in favour of something whch was completely unknown and at the time mocked - the DS - the point here is that a universal console format would lead to less risk taking because their is no dominant vision with a shared unit.

They say "A camal is a horse designed by a commitee" and I think that saying rings true here, if everyone has their say, then what we get is a bog standard console which is a jack of all trades but master of none, but instead unspectacular and awkward in order to please everyone.

There will always be companies like Sony and Microsoft, but comapnies like Apple and Nintendo need their own independence if they are to maintain their unique design philosophies and approach.

Innovation cannot be unified or universal, it has to be completely uncompromised, so in that respect, I am completely against a universal console format. The videogame industry is evolving into something new, people are trying to work out what that is. I don't know what videogames will become, but I know what they won't become, a universal format is not the future of interactive entertainment, neither is multimedia.

Here's a cheeky possibility, what about Sony hooking up with Nintendo in the future? Sounds far fetched, but when you consider that it almost happened before, and when you take into account that the Playstation brand is broken, not because of the PS3, but because it was an unsustainable concept to begin with, and only a company with near unlimited funds could continue such a concept, which is why Microsoft are beating Sony at their own game. So what do you think, Sony and Nintendo?
Boolean's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/19/2007 23:25
Boolean
"Competition drives industry forwards, without it there is no incentive for companies to improve what they make what so ever. Imagine if there was only 1 auto manufacturer, and no one else was allowed to make a car."

Your missing the point. EA isn't saying there should be one car for everyone, they are saying that we need one type of ROAD. At the moment we buy a Microsoft car, but we can only drive on Microsoft roads. We buy a Sony car, we can only drive on sony roads. We should have one type of road and have all the competition focused on developing what matters, the cars/games! Who gives a shit about what road/console it's on?
YARLY's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2007 05:48
YARLY
I think the guy is describing a new sort of platform for gaming in a future where computational power power is limitless and hardware is universally compatible. Essentially, you could just buy all the addon hardware you needed, and all the software would work with whatever you had at perfect quality without any drawbacks. In this case, there would no longer be need for different systems. There would just be an infinitely adaptable easy-to-use console-PC.

Or maybe this is just my idea. But this is definitely quite a ways away...
YARLY's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2007 05:51
YARLY
Oh, and competition wouldn't be gone. Major companies like Nintendo and Sony would just be manufacturing the software and addon hardware, rather than the console itself, as there would no longer be any need for specialized architecture (CPUs/GPUs/cooling/design/etc)...
0chan's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2007 12:51
0chan
thats like saying lets have 1 company making all the TVs and another making all the cars etc STUPID!!! YOU FAIL IT!!! ,did you get a free vacation to write this cuz its some major EA ass kissing, everyone knows EA is the cancer of the gaming industry,
Mr Kryptonite's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2007 14:37
Mr Kryptonite
A universal format will spend the end of innovation, risks and creativity that make games what they are today. There would be no ds no wii no games like okami etc. Competition is good for any bussiness. In the end it benefits the consumer because by competing for our dollars, the companies won't be lazy. They will always try to make the best product; even bigos like EA.
Reallynotnick's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2007 19:03
Reallynotnick
Lets just go back to 2, Sega vs Nintendo.

I figure looking at what has changed in the last 20 years for video games that after 20 years there won't be much else to push forward, I almost want to say 10 but there is always something new they make me want.
LarkOhiya's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/20/2007 21:03
LarkOhiya
NO.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!