"The PS3 was down in February two percent even with the launch of Killzone 2"

Yeah, coz Killzone 2 came out right at the start of Feb, didn't it.

PS3 selling at double the price is Sony making more money than you even when selling less, Greenberg.

Also, Playstation 2? Everybody has or has had one of them by now, surely?

"Greenberg also says that if GTA: The Lost & Damned had sold at retail, it would have outsold Killzone 2"

I love his science behind this. To be honest though, GTA selling well? What a shocker.

Wow, this guy's brought the fanboy out in me!!! Whooooop!

The 360 has very shitty hardware so we are even.

There's a BIG difference between "good value" and "cheap shit" Aaron.

Only last night i was at a mate's who has 2 errorboxes under his TV (one RROD'd after just over a year) He is sick of it and is getting a PS3 next time.

Another tight arsed friend there at the time is buying a mate's errorbox (because he can't afford a PS3, apparently), the guy he's buying it from is selling it..... to get a PS3.

The errorbox is a games console, a games console that will only last a year and isn't economically viable as an online gaming machine.

The PS3 is a top of the range HD multi-media system, plays the BEST games, the BEST movies, is built to last and provides a top notch service to those who buy it, not just to those who pay extra every year.

2%!

Ah yes, forcing his diatribe down unwilling throats. fattening up the masses.

Mr Greenberg may not value you, but you will listen to his opinion

What's funny is MS's strategy is not investing in better games, it's saying "well at least we're not sony".

I suppose since the market's pretty saturated, everybody's made up their mind on which console. The problem for MS is that a lot of their consoles need replacing, and when that happens they're just leaving the back door for somebody to go get a PS3 or a Wii.

Anybody who hasn't got a limit on how many times they can get their 3600 replaced is either an extremely die hard fan, or very short-sighted.

Found one. I think I'll decide which site to use, Thanks.

All this mud slinging doesnt matter, the fact remains at this POINT in time Nintendo are winning, Microsoft are second and Sony are in third place.
Doesnt matter who had a head start or what console broke, sales are sales and money to these three companies is what its all about!

MONEY

hahahahahaha He's hilarious.

Wow, are Sony fanboys blind to facts, or what?

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=acCS8GaO7y0I&refer=news

I like how Greenberg forgets to point out that Killzone 2 came out the SECOND TO LAST DAY OF FEBRUARY. Comparing two weeks of The Lost and Damned sales to two days of Killzone 2 sales? That's cool.

why the fuck does anyone care what this douche has to say anyways. hes just an offical troll. the 360 is cheap and cheerful with loadsa good and shite games an it breaks all the fuckin time..im on my 3rd and the ps is dear as hell and has only about 3 or 4 games that the 360 doesnt that are worht having. but they are BOTH worth having. though fanboy flaming is prettty fun ye gaymos

I've learned to ignore this fool, he's comparing an add-on of an established game to the sales of a game that had only been out two days at the time.


Thats just retarded.

Lol. While I may be a devoted Xbox owner, even I think Aaron Greenberg is generally full of shit.

By the same token though, its fun watching sony fans react to this by screaming about how the ps3 is such a "premium" device.

Nevermind premium devices generally do not make for the biggest selling or most successful devices in any industry, Simply because they cost more for extraneous features.

This is why the wii is winning by a landslide.

@ TorpedoTed yeah but how many xboxs did Microsoft have to repair free of charge?

Even the Wii has all those "extraneous" features that I want, minus a better storage device of some sort.

I think it's hilarious that he describes the Xbox as a "great value". That's just fuckin funny.

And comparing it to a PS2? Completely neglecting the last decade? That might work on an infant, not someone with a lick of intelligence.

Despite what the Bloomberg article says http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=acCS8GaO7y0I&refer=news, Sony's market shares are still worth more than Microsoft. Even though they've taken a loss, they're still ahead (In the STOCK MARKET). This bloomberg article is misleading being that they don't give us the price in the same currency. You CAN buy Sony stock in American currency, yet the article fails to give us prices with comparable numbers. (Sony's stock ranged from $19.80-$20.50 today and MS went for $16.88-$17.65 according to Yahoo! Finance.) We're not blind to facts, honestly, some of us seek valid information to weigh against some snotty PR guy spouting utter nonsense.

Do people forget that Sony makes other things as well? Like computers, cameras, TVs, DVD players, blu-ray players, mp3 players, phones, car radios, home stereo components, and lastly movies...

I realize that were talking games here, but lest we forget that Sony isn't just interested in domination of just the videogame market... They make other things that are fairly high quality in my experience.

Syn has a valid point. How can MS compare themselves to the PS2? Didn't they stop making Xboxes a while ago? Doesn't Sony still make PlayStation 2's? Which one failed because the hard drives were worth more than the entire system? I can also laugh at the points that others have made about KZ2 being out for 2 days and L&D was out for a few weeks... What a comparison!

You heard it from the horses mouth, guys.. MS thinks you're a bunch of morons.

Clance, you do realize Sony loses money on every PS3 they sell. The only reason the price is high is because they can't take a bigger hit than that which they already do.