From a business stand point it makes perfect sense.
To the average person/gamer it's utter bullshit.
Still, I bet it outsells "Mindjack" - or whatever garbage they're putting out nowadays.
As far as your statement about them being brought down to earth I really think they started going down hill about the time Final Fantasy 10 was released. I do have to say though I did enjoy reading your blog as it's always nice to see how other people feel about the big names in gaming.
Blankly speaking.
Also, another Square Enix end of the year post that doesn't include Nier. sucks that Cavia went under as they did some really bizarre stuff.
Oh, and I don't want to see HD Cloud Strife wearing a dress. I'm just not sure that's the direction FFVII should take. FFVIII however definitely needs a remake.
In my velveteen nerd heart an HD remake of Final Fantasy III would be amazing but that's just nostalgia talking. Maybe they can just grow and evolve the Final Fantasy brand into something less convoluted and stale and give us a damn fine RPG.
I heart Atlus. I want a woman's womb inserted into my body so I can have it's babies.
I would understand if they were trying new things and attempting to innovate in their respective genres, but dumbing down an RPG to the point of not even needing to actively participate doesn't make sense to me.
I recall them pulling the "If you want a sequel buy this one" card with Dissidia.
But as far as the article goes I pretty much totally agree a game released by Square used to be a no brainer, you bought it and it was awesome. Now it seems like they are releasing mediocre games and slapping SquareEnix on them so they will sell. I fear that gone are the days when you can look Square being the publisher alone and know its quality, here to stay are the days of waiting for reviews to come out because you just can't trust them anymore.
Really, what people want from SE is an RPG that doesn't try to reinvent the wheel. Rather than spending however many billion dollars they did for all of XIII's self-masturbatory cut scenes, they should have given the characters some actual characterization. Customization, actually tactical combat (rather than a reckless mad dash to get a fast battle time), a sense of exploring a world. Final Fantasy X was very clever about pushing you down a linear path. You never felt like you were going in a straight line. There were people to talk to, actually useful things to purchase, characters to level up in multiple directions of your choice. The world was a living, breathing place, rather than just a long, pretty piece of string to follow. Not until reaching Pulse did I feel like any area in FFXIII was an actual environment where people could exist, and Pulse was ruined by being a long, meandering, pointless waste of time.
If anyone played The Last Remnant on PC (on 360 it's a buggy mess) they'd realize it was probably SE's closest grab at greatness since their old glory days. It made some missteps in attempt to innovate, but definitely played to a few of SE's world-building strengths. If the game had received the amount of resources and attention FFXIII had, it would likely have been a huge success.
tl;dr: SE should stop masturbating over graphics and play to their strengths.
I genuinely hope that SE releases some games that please the rest of you in the near future, though. I can't help but want my fellow RPG fans to be happy, I feel a kinship of shared experiences with you guys, and it has to suck to be disappointed by a company that's meant so much to you in the past.
"People that complain about FFXIII as much as they do have no creativity, imagination and/or respect for innovation."
Do you care to back that up, or do you just like to show up and make ridiculous statements without any semblance of defense? This sounds like the argument of an eight-year old.
[Not to mention that that sentence is semantically horrible: "people who complain as much as they do", wouldn't that be everyone?]
While I do agree XIII sucked, Versus is still a title people want, even more so after the sucky xiii, so you fail
Also, I'm a die hard kingdom hearts fan, so I'm not in any huge rush to get to KH3 and start a bullshit new series with a new villian (which is not speculation, Nomura has confirmed that KH3 will mark the end of the "Xehanort Saga", starting a new series of KH games: http://www.siliconera.com/2010/03/24/tetsuya-nomura-talks-kingdom-hearts-3-and-beyond/) I like my KH as a mostly comprehensible series with a totally kickass and hard to kill Xehanort.
Other than that though I agree this was a bad year for SE, and they really have become disjointed from their fanbase. All I would really ask of them though would be to release Dragon Quest Monsters Joker 2 Professional in America, I could care less about a billion HD remakes, I'd rather play my RPG's portable, and then with as much monster cattching/raising/breeding I can get my hands on.
agree, i never had so much fun on a Sanbox game, it even surpaces San Andreas in that aspect, it was the second best Sanbox game besides RDR in 2010 imo
SaGa Frontier 1997
SaGa Frontier 2 1999
Legend of Mana 1999
The Bouncer 2000
Unlimited Saga 2002
Romancing SaGa 2005
Dawn of Mana 2006
I think all of these games were sub-par or just plain bad. And that doesn't include anything released in the last 5 years. Keep in mind, I'm only posting Square Developed US releases here.
Atlus > Square Enix
The latest DQ had some flavour, but really, I can't remember any other SquareEnix game since then that made me flip out over its greatness.
And as awesome as FFXIII Versus looks like, I'm skeptical.
Oh, and Atlus also pretty much became the new SE to me too.
In any case, nice post and grats on front page. While I think people might have different views then you on some of the finer points, there certainly seems to be some misscontent directed at SE thrughot the gamer community.
If that 'dragon game' doesn't happen then Nier never comes to fruition as Nier's world is the result of Drakengard's (or 'that dragon game' as you prefer) insane 5th ending.
And say what you want about Drakengard and it's sequel. The stories of those games are fantastic. Absolutely fantastic. Yeah, the gameplay of the first was pretty bad and the second, while it made strides, wasn't anything but average. But the story, the characters, the world, the dark atmosphere that Cavia put into it's games, the short stories attached to each weapon which were equally amazing. There is nothing that even comes close to matching those games.
Now Cavia is gone... Well, absorbed by it's parent company technically. But there's little hope of getting more awesomeness like Nier and for that I am truly saddened. No Drakengard 3 and no more new original IPs from Cavia who had slowly, at least for their original titles, been improving by leaps and bounds.
Let me translate what you said: "Let Squareenix do what they used to do. But dont let them revist what they used to do"
Sounds kinda stupid when you break it down huh? Maybe you should think about what you say before you start running your mouth because I actually express what my favorite game(s) are through my online handle, eh?
Still, yeah, SquareEnix's bigger efforts had a really poor showing. Final Fantasy just isn't what it used to be, but Dragon Quest had its most phenomenal entry in the series to date.
Please do us all a favor and skip it. No one is forcing you to get it.
So what if they made a tech demo? It's a tech demo. Get. Over. It.
"If you are dying to play FFVII that much ... GO PLAY FFVII. If you are dying to see what they look like in HD, WATCH ADVENT CHILDREN. I mean, how spoiled can you be? What else do you really want? "
How is watching a crappy movie anything like playing a video game? Is it so much that some people want to see an HD remake of a beloved game? Particularly when we're getting swarmed with HD remakes left and right these days, I don't think it's out of the question. Relax, dude.
You should've also mentioned how Star Ocean was definitely one of the best RPGs to play back in the day. And they fuck that up too with Until the End of time.
"Uh, FF13 was fantastic,"
Does not compute. Seriously, you could have used "good", "decent", "fun to play", something.. but fantastic? I think that's really stretching. Leave the word "fantastic" for games that are..... actually fantastic. Like some of the previous iterations of Final Fantasy, for example.
Btw, I love how you totally forgot to mention the horrible games SE have been releasing. FF XIV for example. Guess that missed your radar somehow?

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow




























follow